Deploy to production (Automated)

[github-actions]

This is an automated pull request to deploy the staging branch to production.
Please review the pull request and comment /deploy to merge this PR and deploy to production.

---

Summary by cubic

Improved error handling for Gmail connections by detecting missing permissions and expired tokens, providing clearer error messages and redirecting users to reconnect when needed.

[jazzberry-ai]

Bug Report

Name	Severity	Example test case	Description
Incorrect error handling due to broad includes check	Medium	The error message "The credentials are invalid." is not correctly identified as a permission error.	The includes() check in the activeDriverProcedure is too broad and can lead to incorrect error handling. The permissionErrors array contains specific phrases, but the includes() check doesn't account for variations in wording or spacing. This can result in legitimate permission errors not being correctly identified and handled. The test case "The credentials are invalid." demonstrates this issue. The current implementation expects the exact phrase "invalid credentials" to be present in the error message.

_{Comments? Email us. Your free trial ends in 6 days.}

[greptile-apps]

Your free trial has ended. If you'd like to continue receiving code reviews, you can add a payment method here.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Join our Discord community for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying with    Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

Status	Name	Latest Commit	Updated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful! View logs	zero-server-staging	d4953f1	Jul 23 2025, 06:48 PM

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying zero-prod with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	f66ba03
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://4d2daed1.zero-76h.pages.dev

View logs

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying zero-staging with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	d4953f1
Status:	⚡️  Build in progress...

View logs

[graphite-app]

Graphite Automations

"Deploy to Production Helper" took an action on this PR • (07/23/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Rahul Mishra's automation.

[jazzberry-ai]

Bug Report

Name	Severity	Example test case	Description
Incomplete Error Matching	Medium	Simulate a Gmail API error with a permission-related message that is not included in the permissionErrors array (e.g., "The application does not have permission").	The code in apps/server/src/trpc/trpc.ts might fail to recognize a permission error, resulting in a generic error message being displayed to the user. This prevents the user from understanding the root cause of the problem and taking appropriate action (e.g., granting the necessary permissions).
Unnecessary Token Removal	Low	Simulate a temporary invalid_grant error.	The code in apps/server/src/trpc/trpc.ts removes the access and refresh tokens, forcing the user to reconnect unnecessarily, even if the error is temporary.
UI Layout Issues (Rounding)	Low	Add content to the EmailComposer or ReplyComposer that might overflow the rounded corners, such as long lines of text or large images, and inspect the UI for clipping.	The addition of rounded-2xl in apps/mail/components/create/email-composer.tsx and apps/mail/components/mail/reply-composer.tsx can introduce layout issues if the content inside the div element overflows the rounded corners. This can result in clipping or an undesirable visual effect. Furthermore, the rounded corners do not match with the styling of the elements surrounding them, which do not have rounded corners. Adding a border further emphasizes the sharp corners outside of the rounded corners.

_{Comments? Email us. Your free trial ends in 6 days.}

[jazzberry-ai]

Bug Report

Name	Severity	Example test case	Description
Gmail Permission Handling	High	Error message "Precondition check failed." is not correctly handled.	The check for permission errors in apps/server/src/trpc/trpc.ts was case-sensitive, causing permission errors with uppercase letters to be missed. This could prevent users from being properly informed about missing Gmail scopes.
Logging in SequentialThinkingProcessor	Low	Thoughts are logged with console.log instead of console.error.	The thoughts in apps/server/src/lib/sequential-thinking.ts are logged using console.log instead of console.error. This is likely an oversight and can make debugging harder.

_{Comments? Email us. Your free trial ends in 6 days.}

[jazzberry-ai]

Bug Report

Name	Severity	Example test case	Description
Incomplete Error Handling in SequentialThinkingProcessor	Low	Call processThought with invalid input.	The processThought method only stringifies the error message, losing valuable debugging information like the stack trace.
Double Definition of openai	Low	Inspect the imports in apps/server/src/routes/agent/index.ts	The openai is defined twice in apps/server/src/routes/agent/index.ts which could lead to unexpected behavior.
Missing OPENAI_MODEL Validation	Low	Start the server without setting the OPENAI_MODEL environment variable.	The application should validate the presence and format of OPENAI_MODEL to ensure proper OpenAI integration.
Incomplete Gmail Error Handling	Medium	Revoke Gmail permissions and try to connect.	The permissionErrors array in apps/server/src/trpc/trpc.ts might not be exhaustive, leading to unhandled permission-related errors.
License Header Removal	Low	Inspect apps/server/src/lib/sequential-thinking.ts	The license header was removed, potentially violating the project's licensing terms.

_{Comments? Email us. Your free trial ends in 6 days.}

[MrgSub]

/deploy

[cursor]

Bug: Model Selection Logic Fails for Anthropic

The model selection logic incorrectly uses env.OPENAI_MODEL for both OpenAI and Anthropic providers. When env.USE_OPENAI is false, an OpenAI model name (if set in OPENAI_MODEL) will be passed to the Anthropic API, leading to failures. Additionally, the hardcoded default Anthropic model, 'claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219', appears to be an invalid model name (e.g., '7' should be '5', and the date format may be incorrect), which would also cause runtime errors.

apps/server/src/routes/agent/index.ts#L1123-L1128

Zero/apps/server/src/routes/agent/index.ts

Lines 1123 to 1128 in d4953f1

	const model =
	env.USE_OPENAI === 'true'
	? openai(env.OPENAI_MODEL || 'gpt-4o')
	: anthropic(env.OPENAI_MODEL || 'claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219');

Fix in Cursor • Fix in Web

---

Bug: Debugging Statements and Unused Code

A console.log('Here!'); debugging statement was left in the code. Additionally, a large block of commented-out code (93 lines) for the sequentialthinking tool registration, including its detailed description and input schema, was accidentally committed and should be either implemented or removed.

apps/server/src/lib/sequential-thinking.ts#L189-L284

Zero/apps/server/src/lib/sequential-thinking.ts

Lines 189 to 284 in d4953f1

	console.log('Here!');
	// this.server.registerTool(
	// 'sequentialthinking',
	// {
	// description: `A detailed tool for dynamic and reflective problem-solving through thoughts.
	// This tool helps analyze problems through a flexible thinking process that can adapt and evolve.
	// Each thought can build on, question, or revise previous insights as understanding deepens.
	// When to use this tool:
	// - Breaking down complex problems into steps
	// - Planning and design with room for revision
	// - Analysis that might need course correction
	// - Problems where the full scope might not be clear initially
	// - Problems that require a multi-step solution
	// - Tasks that need to maintain context over multiple steps
	// - Situations where irrelevant information needs to be filtered out
	// Key features:
	// - You can adjust total_thoughts up or down as you progress
	// - You can question or revise previous thoughts
	// - You can add more thoughts even after reaching what seemed like the end
	// - You can express uncertainty and explore alternative approaches
	// - Not every thought needs to build linearly - you can branch or backtrack
	// - Generates a solution hypothesis
	// - Verifies the hypothesis based on the Chain of Thought steps
	// - Repeats the process until satisfied
	// - Provides a correct answer
	// Parameters explained:
	// - thought: Your current thinking step, which can include:
	// * Regular analytical steps
	// * Revisions of previous thoughts
	// * Questions about previous decisions
	// * Realizations about needing more analysis
	// * Changes in approach
	// * Hypothesis generation
	// * Hypothesis verification
	// - next_thought_needed: True if you need more thinking, even if at what seemed like the end
	// - thought_number: Current number in sequence (can go beyond initial total if needed)
	// - total_thoughts: Current estimate of thoughts needed (can be adjusted up/down)
	// - is_revision: A boolean indicating if this thought revises previous thinking
	// - revises_thought: If is_revision is true, which thought number is being reconsidered
	// - branch_from_thought: If branching, which thought number is the branching point
	// - branch_id: Identifier for the current branch (if any)
	// - needs_more_thoughts: If reaching end but realizing more thoughts needed
	// You should:
	// 1. Start with an initial estimate of needed thoughts, but be ready to adjust
	// 2. Feel free to question or revise previous thoughts
	// 3. Don't hesitate to add more thoughts if needed, even at the "end"
	// 4. Express uncertainty when present
	// 5. Mark thoughts that revise previous thinking or branch into new paths
	// 6. Ignore information that is irrelevant to the current step
	// 7. Generate a solution hypothesis when appropriate
	// 8. Verify the hypothesis based on the Chain of Thought steps
	// 9. Repeat the process until satisfied with the solution
	// 10. Provide a single, ideally correct answer as the final output
	// 11. Only set next_thought_needed to false when truly done and a satisfactory answer is reached`,
	// inputSchema: {
	// thought: z.string().describe('Your current thinking step'),
	// nextThoughtNeeded: z.boolean().describe('Whether another thought step is needed'),
	// thoughtNumber: z.number().int().min(1).describe('Current thought number'),
	// totalThoughts: z.number().int().min(1).describe('Estimated total thoughts needed'),
	// isRevision: z.boolean().optional().describe('Whether this revises previous thinking'),
	// revisesThought: z
	// .number()
	// .int()
	// .min(1)
	// .optional()
	// .describe('Which thought is being reconsidered'),
	// branchFromThought: z
	// .number()
	// .int()
	// .min(1)
	// .optional()
	// .describe('Branching point thought number'),
	// branchId: z.string().optional().describe('Branch identifier'),
	// needsMoreThoughts: z.boolean().optional().describe('If more thoughts are needed'),
	// },
	// },
	// (params) => {
	// return this.thinkingServer.processThought({
	// thought: params.thought,
	// nextThoughtNeeded: params.nextThoughtNeeded,
	// thoughtNumber: params.thoughtNumber,
	// totalThoughts: params.totalThoughts,
	// isRevision: params.isRevision,
	// revisesThought: params.revisesThought,
	// branchFromThought: params.branchFromThought,
	// branchId: params.branchId,
	// needsMoreThoughts: params.needsMoreThoughts,
	// });
	// },
	// );

Fix in Cursor • Fix in Web

---

Bug: Zero Value Rejection Bug

The validateThoughtData method incorrectly rejects 0 for thoughtNumber and totalThoughts parameters. This occurs because truthiness checks (!input.thoughtNumber) are used, which evaluate to true for 0. The resulting error messages ("must be a number") are misleading, as 0 is a number. Given the implied schema requirement for a minimum value of 1, the validation should explicitly check for input.thoughtNumber < 1 (and similarly for totalThoughts) in addition to type checking.

apps/server/src/lib/sequential-thinking.ts#L41-L47

Zero/apps/server/src/lib/sequential-thinking.ts

Lines 41 to 47 in d4953f1

	}
	if (!input.thoughtNumber || typeof input.thoughtNumber !== 'number') {
	throw new Error('Invalid thoughtNumber: must be a number');
	}
	if (!input.totalThoughts || typeof input.totalThoughts !== 'number') {
	throw new Error('Invalid totalThoughts: must be a number');
	}

Fix in Cursor • Fix in Web

---

Bugbot free trial expires on July 29, 2025
Learn more in the Cursor dashboard.

Was this report helpful? Give feedback by reacting with 👍 or 👎