Skip to content

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Jul 23, 2025

This is an automated pull request to deploy the staging branch to production.
Please review the pull request and comment /deploy to merge this PR and deploy to production.


Summary by cubic

Enabled the Sequential Thinking MCP tool for dynamic, multi-step problem-solving and integrated it into the agent workflow with a dedicated SSE endpoint.

  • New Features
    • Activated and registered the ThinkingMCP tool with full input schema and description.
    • Added SSE endpoint for ThinkingMCP and updated agent to connect and use its tools.
    • Updated Durable Object and deployment configs to support ThinkingMCP in all environments.

# Implement Sequential Thinking MCP

This PR implements the Sequential Thinking MCP, a tool for dynamic and reflective problem-solving through a flexible thinking process. The implementation:

1. Activates the previously commented-out sequential thinking tool in the ThinkingMCP class
2. Registers the ThinkingMCP in the worker entrypoint
3. Adds proper SSE endpoint for the thinking MCP
4. Connects the agent to the thinking MCP and enables its AI tools
5. Updates Durable Object configurations in wrangler.jsonc for all environments

## Type of Change

- [x] ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## Areas Affected

- [x] API Endpoints
- [x] Development Workflow
- [x] Deployment/Infrastructure

## Testing Done

- [x] Manual testing performed

## Checklist

- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] All tests pass locally

## Additional Notes

The Sequential Thinking tool provides a structured approach to problem-solving that can adapt and evolve as understanding deepens. It allows for revising previous thoughts, branching into new paths, and adjusting the thinking process as needed.
@github-actions github-actions bot added the production-deploy This PR is meant to update production label Jul 23, 2025
@jazzberry-ai
Copy link

jazzberry-ai bot commented Jul 23, 2025

Bug Report

Name Severity Example test case Description
Mismatched Durable Object Configuration in Production Environment High Deploy the application to the production environment and observe if the agent connects to the Thinking MCP. In the wrangler.jsonc file, the production environment has a durable object named ZERO_THINKING_MCP and a class name ZeroThinkingMCP, while the local and staging environments use THINKING_MCP and ThinkingMCP. This inconsistency will cause deployment and runtime errors in production.

Comments? Email us. Your free trial ends in 6 days.

Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your free trial has ended. If you'd like to continue receiving code reviews, you can add a payment method here.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 23, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Join our Discord community for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot requested a review from MrgSub July 23, 2025 20:05
@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jul 23, 2025

Deploying zero-staging with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 5fda69d
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://75f1865f.zero-staging-c02.pages.dev

View logs

@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Jul 23, 2025

Graphite Automations

"Deploy to Production Helper" took an action on this PR • (07/23/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Rahul Mishra's automation.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jul 23, 2025

Deploying with  Cloudflare Workers  Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

Status Name Latest Commit Updated (UTC)
❌ Deployment failed
View logs
zero-server-production 5fda69d Jul 25 2025, 05:30 PM

# READ CAREFULLY THEN REMOVE

Remove bullet points that are not relevant.

PLEASE REFRAIN FROM USING AI TO WRITE YOUR CODE AND PR DESCRIPTION. IF YOU DO USE AI TO WRITE YOUR CODE PLEASE PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION AND REVIEW IT CAREFULLY. MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND THE CODE YOU ARE SUBMITTING USING AI.

- Pull requests that do not follow these guidelines will be closed without review or comment.
- If you use AI to write your PR description your pr will be close without review or comment.
- If you are unsure about anything, feel free to ask for clarification.

## Description

Please provide a clear description of your changes.

---

## Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [ ] 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature with breaking changes)
- [ ] 📝 Documentation update
- [ ] 🎨 UI/UX improvement
- [ ] 🔒 Security enhancement
- [ ] ⚡ Performance improvement

## Areas Affected

Please check all that apply:

- [ ] Email Integration (Gmail, IMAP, etc.)
- [ ] User Interface/Experience
- [ ] Authentication/Authorization
- [ ] Data Storage/Management
- [ ] API Endpoints
- [ ] Documentation
- [ ] Testing Infrastructure
- [ ] Development Workflow
- [ ] Deployment/Infrastructure

## Testing Done

Describe the tests you've done:

- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
- [ ] Integration tests added/updated
- [ ] Manual testing performed
- [ ] Cross-browser testing (if UI changes)
- [ ] Mobile responsiveness verified (if UI changes)

## Security Considerations

For changes involving data or authentication:

- [ ] No sensitive data is exposed
- [ ] Authentication checks are in place
- [ ] Input validation is implemented
- [ ] Rate limiting is considered (if applicable)

## Checklist

- [ ] I have read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/Mail-0/Zero/blob/staging/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md) document
- [ ] My code follows the project's style guidelines
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in complex areas
- [ ] I have updated the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix/feature works
- [ ] All tests pass locally
- [ ] Any dependent changes are merged and published

## Additional Notes

Add any other context about the pull request here.

## Screenshots/Recordings

Add screenshots or recordings here if applicable.

---

_By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the project's license._

    
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
---

## Summary by cubic
Added the mail.google.com scope to Google authentication providers to enable full Gmail access for connected accounts. This allows the app to use all Gmail API features that require this scope.

<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
@jazzberry-ai
Copy link

jazzberry-ai bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Bug Report

Name Severity Example test case Description
Durable Object Configuration Inconsistency Medium Deploy to production and test the Thinking MCP The wrangler.jsonc has an incorrect durable object binding for the Thinking MCP in production.
Missing Sanitization of Context Data High Trigger an error in GoogleMailManager and examine logs The sanitizeContext function is not called, leading to potential exposure of sensitive data in logs.
withErrorHandlerNew is not used Low Check the GoogleMailManager class There are two error handlers, but only one is actually used.

Comments? Email us. Your free trial ends in 4 days.

Copy link

@cursor cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bugbot free trial expires on July 29, 2025
Learn more in the Cursor dashboard.

# READ CAREFULLY THEN REMOVE

Remove bullet points that are not relevant.

PLEASE REFRAIN FROM USING AI TO WRITE YOUR CODE AND PR DESCRIPTION. IF YOU DO USE AI TO WRITE YOUR CODE PLEASE PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION AND REVIEW IT CAREFULLY. MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND THE CODE YOU ARE SUBMITTING USING AI.

- Pull requests that do not follow these guidelines will be closed without review or comment.
- If you use AI to write your PR description your pr will be close without review or comment.
- If you are unsure about anything, feel free to ask for clarification.

## Description

Please provide a clear description of your changes.

---

## Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [ ] 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature with breaking changes)
- [ ] 📝 Documentation update
- [ ] 🎨 UI/UX improvement
- [ ] 🔒 Security enhancement
- [ ] ⚡ Performance improvement

## Areas Affected

Please check all that apply:

- [ ] Email Integration (Gmail, IMAP, etc.)
- [ ] User Interface/Experience
- [ ] Authentication/Authorization
- [ ] Data Storage/Management
- [ ] API Endpoints
- [ ] Documentation
- [ ] Testing Infrastructure
- [ ] Development Workflow
- [ ] Deployment/Infrastructure

## Testing Done

Describe the tests you've done:

- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
- [ ] Integration tests added/updated
- [ ] Manual testing performed
- [ ] Cross-browser testing (if UI changes)
- [ ] Mobile responsiveness verified (if UI changes)

## Security Considerations

For changes involving data or authentication:

- [ ] No sensitive data is exposed
- [ ] Authentication checks are in place
- [ ] Input validation is implemented
- [ ] Rate limiting is considered (if applicable)

## Checklist

- [ ] I have read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/Mail-0/Zero/blob/staging/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md) document
- [ ] My code follows the project's style guidelines
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in complex areas
- [ ] I have updated the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix/feature works
- [ ] All tests pass locally
- [ ] Any dependent changes are merged and published

## Additional Notes

Add any other context about the pull request here.

## Screenshots/Recordings

Add screenshots or recordings here if applicable.

---

_By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the project's license._

    
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
---

## Summary by cubic
Removed all console.log statements from the production build to prevent logging sensitive information and reduce bundle size.

<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
@jazzberry-ai
Copy link

jazzberry-ai bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Bug Report

Name Severity Example test case Description
ThinkingMCP Durable Object Naming Inconsistency High Deploy the application to the production environment and attempt to use the sequential thinking MCP. The wrangler.jsonc file has inconsistent durable object naming for the ThinkingMCP across different environments. The production environment uses ZERO_THINKING_MCP and ZeroThinkingMCP, while local and staging use THINKING_MCP and ThinkingMCP. This discrepancy will likely cause the ThinkingMCP to fail in production.

Comments? Email us. Your free trial ends in 4 days.

# READ CAREFULLY THEN REMOVE

Remove bullet points that are not relevant.

PLEASE REFRAIN FROM USING AI TO WRITE YOUR CODE AND PR DESCRIPTION. IF YOU DO USE AI TO WRITE YOUR CODE PLEASE PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION AND REVIEW IT CAREFULLY. MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND THE CODE YOU ARE SUBMITTING USING AI.

- Pull requests that do not follow these guidelines will be closed without review or comment.
- If you use AI to write your PR description your pr will be close without review or comment.
- If you are unsure about anything, feel free to ask for clarification.

## Description

Please provide a clear description of your changes.

---

## Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [ ] 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature with breaking changes)
- [ ] 📝 Documentation update
- [ ] 🎨 UI/UX improvement
- [ ] 🔒 Security enhancement
- [ ] ⚡ Performance improvement

## Areas Affected

Please check all that apply:

- [ ] Email Integration (Gmail, IMAP, etc.)
- [ ] User Interface/Experience
- [ ] Authentication/Authorization
- [ ] Data Storage/Management
- [ ] API Endpoints
- [ ] Documentation
- [ ] Testing Infrastructure
- [ ] Development Workflow
- [ ] Deployment/Infrastructure

## Testing Done

Describe the tests you've done:

- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
- [ ] Integration tests added/updated
- [ ] Manual testing performed
- [ ] Cross-browser testing (if UI changes)
- [ ] Mobile responsiveness verified (if UI changes)

## Security Considerations

For changes involving data or authentication:

- [ ] No sensitive data is exposed
- [ ] Authentication checks are in place
- [ ] Input validation is implemented
- [ ] Rate limiting is considered (if applicable)

## Checklist

- [ ] I have read the [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/Mail-0/Zero/blob/staging/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md) document
- [ ] My code follows the project's style guidelines
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in complex areas
- [ ] I have updated the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix/feature works
- [ ] All tests pass locally
- [ ] Any dependent changes are merged and published

## Additional Notes

Add any other context about the pull request here.

## Screenshots/Recordings

Add screenshots or recordings here if applicable.

---

_By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the project's license._

    
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
---

## Summary by cubic
Renamed the "ZERO_THINKING_MCP" entry to "THINKING_MCP" in wrangler.jsonc for consistency with class naming.

<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
@jazzberry-ai
Copy link

jazzberry-ai bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Bug Report

Name | Severity | Example test case | Description
Durable Object Naming Mismatch | Critical | Deploy the application with the current configuration. The ThinkingMCP durable object will fail to initialize because the class name in wrangler.jsonc (ZeroThinkingMCP) does not match the durable object name (THINKING_MCP). | The durable object name for ThinkingMCP was changed to THINKING_MCP in apps/server/wrangler.jsonc, but the corresponding class name in the class_name field and in the new_sqlite_classes array was not updated. This mismatch will cause the durable object to fail to initialize correctly. It should be THINKING_MCP and ThinkingMCP.

Comments? Email us. Your free trial ends in 4 days.

@MrgSub
Copy link
Collaborator

MrgSub commented Jul 25, 2025

/deploy

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 5fda69d into main Jul 25, 2025
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

production-deploy This PR is meant to update production

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant