Add krbPrincipalName as X_REMOTE_USER_PRINCIPAL for httpd#1345
Merged
Fryguy merged 1 commit intoManageIQ:masterfrom Feb 20, 2026
Merged
Conversation
We only set this for usage through sssd and httpd but this could be used as the de facto standard for all httpd based identity providers. Follow up to: ManageIQ/manageiq#23723 ManageIQ/manageiq-appliance#401 ManageIQ/guides#587
2 tasks
Member
|
Checked commit jrafanie@76c763b with ruby 3.3.10, rubocop 1.56.3, haml-lint 0.69.0, and yamllint |
Fryguy
approved these changes
Feb 20, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We only set this for usage through sssd and httpd but this could be used as the de facto standard for all httpd based identity providers.
Discussed in ManageIQ/manageiq#23723 (comment)
Follow up to:
ManageIQ/manageiq#23723
ManageIQ/manageiq-appliance#401 ManageIQ/guides#587
(Technically not a bug here but the original was for freeipa users logging in with the freeipa userid or email and having two different backend users be created on our side... a bug)