Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support --extra-env-{key,value} in buck #20

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025
Merged

support --extra-env-{key,value} in buck #20

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

tek
Copy link
Contributor

@tek tek commented Feb 5, 2025

As we discussed briefly, this isn't optimal, since it stores the variables in the shared env, but there's no obvious solution, it isn't that important right now and normal GHC operations don't have that feature either.

@tek tek mentioned this pull request Feb 5, 2025
@tek tek requested a review from wavewave February 5, 2025 17:07
Copy link
Collaborator

@wavewave wavewave left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. eventually ad hoc environment variables should not be used, but that can be provided in a different form and this can be an implementation basis.

@tek tek merged commit da6ba74 into main Feb 6, 2025
@tek tek deleted the tek/extra-env branch February 6, 2025 14:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants