Skip to content

npm Package: safe-command Wrapper Allowlist Bypass via Shell Chaining

High
MervinPraison published GHSA-5jv7-2mjm-h6qj Jun 17, 2026

Package

npm praisonai (npm)

Affected versions

>= 1.5.1, <= 1.7.1

Patched versions

>= 1.7.2

Description

Summary

The published npm package praisonai ships dist/tools/utility-tools.js, which exports a shell(command) helper described in source as:

Execute shell command (safe version - read-only commands)

The helper attempts to enforce a safe read-only command allowlist by checking only the first whitespace-delimited token:

const safeCommands = ['ls', 'cat', 'head', 'tail', 'wc', 'grep', 'find', 'echo', 'date', 'pwd', 'which'];
const firstWord = command.split(/\s+/)[0];

if (!safeCommands.includes(firstWord)) {
    return { success: false, error: `Command not allowed: ${firstWord}` };
}

It then passes the entire original string to Node child_process.exec():

const { stdout, stderr } = await execAsync(command, { timeout: 5000 });

Because exec() runs the command through a shell, a command string that starts with an allowed command can append a second non-allowlisted command with shell metacharacters. For example, direct printf <marker> is rejected, but echo ok; printf <marker> is accepted and executes printf.

This bypasses the helper's safe-command policy and allows arbitrary shell commands to run with the PraisonAI process privileges when an application, agent, or integration exposes this helper to lower-trust users, prompts, model output, or plugin/tool input.

The PoV is deterministic and local-only. It installs only the npm package, runs harmless marker commands, and does not contact any live service after installation.

Technical Details

utility-tools.shell() authorizes one token but executes the full shell string.

Source-head implementation:

export async function shell(command: string): Promise<ToolResult<string>> {
    // Only allow safe read-only commands
    const safeCommands = ['ls', 'cat', 'head', 'tail', 'wc', 'grep', 'find', 'echo', 'date', 'pwd', 'which'];
    const firstWord = command.split(/\s+/)[0];

    if (!safeCommands.includes(firstWord)) {
        return { success: false, error: `Command not allowed: ${firstWord}` };
    }

    try {
        const { exec } = await import('child_process');
        const { promisify } = await import('util');
        const execAsync = promisify(exec);

        const { stdout, stderr } = await execAsync(command, { timeout: 5000 });
        return { success: true, data: stdout || stderr };
    } catch (error: any) {
        return { success: false, error: error.message ?? String(error) };
    }
}

The published npm:praisonai@1.7.1 dist file preserves the same behavior:

  • exports.shell = shell
  • const firstWord = command.split(/\s+/)[0]
  • if (!safeCommands.includes(firstWord)) ...
  • const { stdout, stderr } = await execAsync(command, { timeout: 5000 })

This creates a policy/parser differential: PraisonAI checks only the first token, while the shell parses the full string as a script.

Why This Is Not Intended Behavior

The helper is explicitly documented in code as a "safe version" for read-only commands and contains an allowlist of specific safe commands. The control test proves that non-allowlisted commands are intended to be blocked: direct printf <marker> returns Command not allowed: printf.

The same helper accepting echo ok; printf <marker> is therefore a bypass of the intended safe-command boundary, not merely a permissive command runner.

This is also consistent with Node's own guidance for shell execution: child_process.exec() runs through a shell, and shell metacharacters can change which commands execute. The fix should make PraisonAI's authorization boundary match what is actually executed.

PoV

Run from a local reproduction checkout:

node poc/pov_poc.js 1.7.1

Observed output summary from evidence/pov-npm-1.7.1.json:

{
  "package": "npm:praisonai",
  "version": "1.7.1",
  "installedPackageVersion": "1.7.1",
  "commands": {
    "directDisallowedCommand": "printf poc.7.1",
    "benignAllowedCommand": "echo poc",
    "chainedBypassCommand": "echo poc; printf poc.7.1"
  },
  "controls": {
    "directDisallowedRejected": true,
    "benignAllowedAccepted": true,
    "patchedControlRejectsChainedShell": true
  },
  "observed": {
    "directDisallowed": {
      "success": false,
      "error": "Command not allowed: printf"
    },
    "chainedBypass": {
      "success": true,
      "data": "poc\npoc.7.1"
    }
  },
  "vulnerable": true
}

Interpretation:

  • Direct printf <marker> is rejected because printf is not in safeCommands.
  • Benign echo ... is accepted.
  • echo ...; printf <marker> is accepted because the first token is echo.
  • The shell then executes the non-allowlisted printf command.
  • A patched-control validator that rejects shell metacharacters before execution blocks the chained command while still allowing benign echo.

The PoV uses only harmless marker output. It does not read system files, leak environment variables, call external services, or run destructive commands.

PoC

The PoV section above contains the local reproduction command, input, and decisive output.

Impact

If lower-trust users, prompts, model output, plugins, or tool input can influence a command string passed to utility-tools.shell(), the safe-command allowlist does not restrict execution to the intended read-only commands. An attacker can append arbitrary shell commands after an allowed first token and run them with the PraisonAI process privileges.

Concrete consequences depend on the embedding application and process privileges, but can include:

  • reading files and secrets available to the process;
  • modifying files or project state;
  • invoking local tools and package managers;
  • network exfiltration if the host permits egress; and
  • denial of service by running expensive commands.

This report does not claim that npm PraisonAI exposes this helper as a default unauthenticated network service. It is a library-level safe-command wrapper bypass in a shipped npm subpath.

Severity

Suggested severity: High.

Suggested CVSS v3.1:

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Suggested CWEs:

  • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command
  • CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
  • CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure

Rationale:

  • AV:N: common PraisonAI use is a network-facing application, agent API, or tool integration that accepts user or prompt-controlled tasks.
  • AC:L: a single command string beginning with an allowed command is sufficient.
  • PR:L: conservative scoring assumes the attacker can submit prompts or work items to the application using this helper.
  • UI:N: no further operator interaction is required once the command reaches the helper.
  • S:U: impact is within the PraisonAI-hosting process and its host context.
  • C:H/I:H/A:H: arbitrary shell commands can affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability depending on process privileges.

If maintainers score only direct local library use, AV:L may be reasonable. If a deployment exposes this helper through unauthenticated agent/tool endpoints, PR:N may be reasonable.

Suggested Fix

Avoid passing policy-checked strings to a shell.

Recommended:

  1. Replace exec(command) with execFile() or spawn(command, args, { shell: false }).
  2. Require callers to pass { command, args } instead of a shell string, or parse the shell string into argv with a shell-aware parser before policy checks.
  3. Apply the allowlist to the exact executable that will be invoked.
  4. Reject shell metacharacters (;, &&, ||, |, backticks, $(), redirects, newlines) if a string API must remain available.
  5. Add regression tests proving that echo ok is allowed while printf marker, echo ok; printf marker, echo ok && printf marker, and echo ok | printf marker are rejected.

If this helper is not intended to be public, also consider adding a package exports map that exposes only supported public API paths.

Affected Package/Versions

  • Repository: MervinPraison/PraisonAI
  • Ecosystem: npm
  • Package: praisonai
  • Component: TypeScript utility tools helper src/praisonai-ts/src/tools/utility-tools.ts
  • Published dist path: node_modules/praisonai/dist/tools/utility-tools.js
  • Latest npm package validated: 1.7.1
  • Current origin/main validated: 1ad58ca02975ff1398efeda694ea2ab78f20cf3e
  • src/praisonai-ts/package.json at origin/main: praisonai 1.7.1

Suggested affected range:

npm:praisonai >= 1.5.1, <= 1.7.1

All published npm 1.x versions were swept locally:

  • 1.0.0 through 1.5.0: dist/tools/utility-tools.js was not present in the tested package.
  • 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.5.3, 1.5.4, 1.6.0, 1.7.0, and 1.7.1: vulnerable.

The npm package has no exports map and ships dist in its files list, so the affected helper is importable as a package subpath:

const { shell } = require("praisonai/dist/tools/utility-tools.js");

The root package entry point does not appear to re-export this helper directly. This report is scoped to the shipped npm subpath and the TypeScript source that generates it.

Advisory History

Visible PraisonAI advisories and prior submissions were checked. The closest known issues are adjacent but distinct:

  • GHSA-vjv9-7m7j-h833 covers npm TypeScript SandboxExecutor.allowedCommands in src/cli/features/sandbox-executor.ts, where a caller-supplied allowlist is checked before spawn("sh", ["-c", command]).
  • This report covers npm TypeScript utility-tools.shell() in src/tools/utility-tools.ts, where a built-in "safe read-only commands" allowlist is checked before child_process.exec(command).
  • Fixing only SandboxExecutor leaves this helper unchanged.
  • The public Python/PyPI command-injection advisories cover different packages, files, and execution paths, such as Python execute_command, run_python(), memory hooks, and subprocess sandbox code.

This is a sibling-callsite variant of the same mature allowlist/shell-parser class, but it is not the same function, policy surface, affected version range, or shipped import path as the prior npm SandboxExecutor advisory.

References

  • PraisonAI tools concept docs: https://docs.praison.ai/docs/concepts/tools
  • PraisonAI TypeScript CLI docs: https://docs.praison.ai/docs/js/cli
  • Node.js child_process docs: https://nodejs.org/api/child_process.html
  • File Browser shell-metacharacter allowlist bypass: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8c9q-7855-wfxq
  • File Browser prior command allowlist bypass: https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/security/advisories/GHSA-w7qc-6grj-w7r8
  • Public related PraisonAI command injection advisory: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-2763-cj5r-c79m
  • MITRE CWE-78: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html
  • OWASP OS Command Injection Defense Cheat Sheet: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/OS_Command_Injection_Defense_Cheat_Sheet.html

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVE ID

CVE-2026-57133

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. Learn more on MITRE.

Protection Mechanism Failure

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product. Learn more on MITRE.

Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits