chore: Support deeplink for swap

[tommasini]

Description

This PR adds deeplink support for swap with prefill for source token, destination token and value.

The address of source and destination token is handled in caip19 format.
Value is in hexadecimal format.

If any deeplink param is not as expected (is not a caip19 format or it isn't defined) it's redirecting to the swaps screen without pre-filing

If value is not a hexadecimal or not defined is defaulting to 0

You can test this deeplink with this deelink generator website: https://qr-code-generator-tmp.vercel.app/

To figure it out:

Scenarios:

• When the deeplink have a source and destination token with the same chain id, and that differs from the selected chain id should we switch?
  A: New screen will handle this scenarios because it will have the bridge possibility as well.
• Is the intention when the chain id of source and destination token differs to navigate to bridge or to consider other scenario, like only navigating to swaps screen without prefills?
  A: New screen will handle this scenarios because it will have the bridge possibility as well.

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

1. Go to this page...

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 06c8201
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/22504549-eb1a-4520-a6e1-271d80462845

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
73.9% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[tommasini]

Converting this to a draft while waiting for new developments

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
73.9% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud