feat: Add advanced details row into transfer confirmations

[OGPoyraz]

Description

This PR mainly adds AdvancedDetailsRow into transfer confirmations.

Also adjusts couple things

• Rename ExpandableSection into Expandable
• In order to give freedom parent components to set what component could trigger expanded modal this doesn't apply InfoSection now. We do this to prevent styling issues of putting icons and such.
• Adds new prop to InfoRow withIcon that puts an icon on the right
• All signature related changes are due to Expandable changes - please see that there is no functional or design change in the screenshots.
• All changes contributes Expandable to be consistent with single InfoRow components like network fees - please see "before" section in screenshots

Related issues

Fixes: https://github.com/MetaMask/MetaMask-planning/issues/4789

Manual testing steps

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 2041a9f
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/a39c995d-e0b9-4793-9bc4-8deabe10348f

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.84%. Comparing base (cf99fce) to head (894c984).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15004      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.81%   67.84%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        2339     2345       +6     
  Lines       50384    50433      +49     
  Branches     7427     7433       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        34168    34215      +47     
- Misses      14052    14054       +2     
  Partials     2164     2164              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 5f10d03
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/5c7863bb-39f4-43a0-be0f-c2a42e31e9ed

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 16929d2
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/b1bf42ba-3b49-4358-b67a-b1839f057a99

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
91.9% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud