modules/sops: allow forcing systemd-based activation (attempt #2) #858
+19
−6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
By allowing users to optionally force using systemd unit-based activation, they can inject dependencies on other services or mountpoints (for instance, when the age key is not stored on the root file system).
lschuermann
force-pushed
the
dev/systemd-activation-option
branch
from
4cd511f to
b2cddb0
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@Mic92 Sorry for all the noise. @sedlund confirmed that this patch doesn't break evaluation any more, so I think this should be good to go. I tried extending one of the existing NixOS tests with the respective |
SuperSandro2000
approved these changes
Nov 17, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
By allowing users to optionally force using systemd unit-based activation, they can inject dependencies on other services or mountpoints (for instance, when the age key is not stored on the root file system).
This is effectively the same PR as #855, but with a
defaultTextoption added. I've managed to reproduce the original reported issue (usingdocumentation.nixos.includeAllModules = true;), and with this PRsops-nixevaluates even with this option set.Closes #856