Skip to content

Conversation

@NamithaNarangoli
Copy link

Verified with VPN PG: [email protected]

@prmerger-automator
Copy link
Contributor

@NamithaNarangoli : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 65c3f63:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
includes/vpn-gateway-faq-nat-include.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@ktoliver
Copy link
Contributor

@cherylmc

Can you review the proposed changes?

IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Dec 19, 2025
@ktoliver ktoliver requested a review from Copilot December 19, 2025 16:34
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a new FAQ entry to clarify the maximum number of IP prefixes allowed in Dynamic NAT rule mappings for VPN Gateway. The update addresses a common question about prefix limitations in NAT configurations.

Key changes:

  • Added a new FAQ question and answer about Dynamic NAT rule prefix limits

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants