-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
[WIP] Control where additional nprop steps are added in the lambda protocol #156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #156 +/- ##
=========================================
+ Coverage 59.53% 60.9% +1.36%
=========================================
Files 7 7
Lines 1478 1504 +26
Branches 266 272 +6
=========================================
+ Hits 880 916 +36
+ Misses 498 491 -7
+ Partials 100 97 -3
|
Yes, and then perhaps including some textfile that lists what changes to the alchemical function someone could use to control how much time is spent on the sterics/electrostatics ? |
In other words the documentation needs updating... :) |
ie 65% electrostatics, 35% sterics 90% electrostatics, 10% sterics will be usefull if someone needs to use it for water.... |
@davidlmobley I was able to merge it with my local master branch without any conflicts. |
Description
Adds a
propRegion
option to the integrator to allow focusing the additional propagation steps either in the sterics (in the middle) or the electrostatics (at either ends of the lambda protocol)Todos
Notable points that this PR has either accomplished or will accomplish.
Status