Added nested endpoint for predictions.

[epou]

Depends on #258

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 78.57143% with 45 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 49.99%. Comparing base (7e01c5e) to head (f9b5375).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
tigacrafting/views.py	8.33%	11 Missing ⚠️
tigacrafting/models.py	92.36%	10 Missing ⚠️
tigaserver_app/models.py	28.57%	10 Missing ⚠️
tigacrafting/admin.py	66.66%	7 Missing ⚠️
tigaserver_app/serializers.py	50.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
tigaserver_app/managers.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
tigaserver_app/views.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #261      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   49.66%   49.99%   +0.32%     
==========================================
  Files          70       71       +1     
  Lines       10154    10280     +126     
==========================================
+ Hits         5043     5139      +96     
- Misses       5111     5141      +30     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[jgarriga65]

Aquí tens un dicionari amb els possibles missatges:
{
"Aedes aegypti": "Our AI identified the mosquito in this photo as a yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti). Thanks for participating!",
"Aedes albopictus": "Our AI identified the mosquito in this photo as a tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus). Thanks for participating!",
"Aedes japonicus": "Our AI identified the mosquito in this photo as Aedes japonicus. Thanks for participating!",
"Aedes koreicus": "Our AI identified the mosquito in this photo as Aedes koreicus. Thanks for participating!",
"Anopheles sp": "Our AI has identified the mosquito in this photo as belonging to the genus Anopheles sp.. This is not of our targeted species, but your contribution is still very useful. Thanks for participating!",
"Culex sp": "Our AI has identified the mosquito in this photo as the common house mosquito (Culex sp.). Thanks for participating!",
"Culiseta sp": "Our AI has identified the mosquito in this photo as belonging to the genus Culiseta sp. This is not of our targeted species, but your contribution is still very useful. Thanks for participating!"
"other-species": "Our AI processed this image but couldn’t identify any of our targeted mosquitoes. Still, we appreciate this contribution. Thanks for participating!",
"not-clear": "Our AI processed this image but couldn't identify any mosquito species as the image is not clear enough. Still, we appreciate this contribution. Thanks for participating!",
"not-classified": "Our AI has processed this image but it is not confident enough to identify the mosquito species (the score is below our threshold of confidence). Still, your observation is very useful. Thanks for participating!",
"off-topic": "Our AI found no species of interest in this report in relation to the Mosquito Alert citizen science project.",
"no-images": "Our AI found no images in this report.",
}
Els dos últims no tenen massa sentit en aquest context perquè serien casos en que la foto no es publica, però ... t'ho passo igualment. En tot cas els ignores.

[jgarriga65]

No sé si cal/volem inclore l'score. (??)