Editable source repo for OpenClaw skills, reusable roles, and shared conventions.
Use this repo when you want to:
- find the right skill for a task
- update how a skill behaves at runtime
- reuse a role instead of copying role prose into a skill
- keep shared repo conventions in one place
Local OpenClaw reads skills directly from this repo's SKILL.md files, so packaged .skill bundles are not needed for normal local use.
- Start here
- How this repo works
- Repo map
- Common workflows
- Skill index
- Role index
- Process docs
- Conventions
- Repo rules
If you need...
- a runnable skill -> go to
skills/ - a reusable reviewer/writer/specialist role -> go to
roles/ - a repo-level shared rule or memory convention -> go to
conventions/ - to create or rewrite a skill -> start with
skills/create-skill
Think of the repo in three layers:
-
skills/— executable skill source- each skill lives in its own folder
- runtime entrypoint is
skills/<name>/SKILL.md - references, scripts, and assets live beside it
-
roles/— reusable role contracts- these are not runnable skills
- they hold canonical specialist identity, rubric, and learnings
- skills should load and adapt them instead of re-owning the same role prose
-
conventions/— repo-level defaults- shared conventions that multiple roles or skills may reference
- use these when the rule is broader than one skill but narrower than general repo docs
skills/ runnable skill folders
roles/ reusable role contracts
conventions/ shared repo-level conventions
SPDD-lite.md lightweight process doc
README.md onboarding + repo map
Canonical shapes:
skills/<skill-name>/
SKILL.md
references/
scripts/ # optional
assets/ # optional
roles/<Role-Name>/
ROLE.md
RUBRIC.md
LEARNINGS.md
When a canonical label and folder path differ, the folder path is the source of truth. Current non-trivial mappings:
frontend taste->roles/frontend-tasteprivacy/data-safety->roles/privacy-data-safetyqa/reliability->roles/qa-reliability
- README/launch framing, messaging, positioning ->
skills/devrel-copywriter - docs, setup, usage, onboarding, API explanation ->
skills/docs-writer - create or refactor a skill ->
skills/create-skill - planning + slice + approval flow for code work ->
skills/dev-harness - multi-role review ->
skills/code-review-orchestrator - pre-implementation Researcher -> Critic research verdict ->
skills/research-critic
If a skill needs a reusable specialist voice:
- load from
roles/ - adapt it to the current phase
- keep role identity in
roles/, not in local copied prose
- Start from concrete usage, not abstract theory.
- Use
skills/create-skillwhen building or rewriting the skill. - Keep
SKILL.mdlean. - Push bulky or variant-specific detail into
references/. - Add scripts only for deterministic repeated work.
- Test with representative prompts before calling it done.
-
skills/devrel-copywriter- What it is: developer-facing framing, positioning, launch copy, README intros, and messaging polish.
- Use when: the main job is message hierarchy, payoff, tone, and believable product framing.
- Do not use when: the main job is teaching setup, usage, onboarding, migration, or API behavior.
-
skills/docs-writer- What it is: documentation writing and rewriting for usage, setup, onboarding, migration, and API/reference clarity.
- Use when: the main job is reader success through clear explanation and structure.
- Do not use when: the main job is framing, positioning, or README opening copy.
-
skills/cover-letter-writer- What it is: tailored cover letter creation from job context and resume material.
- Use when: the task is job-specific cover-letter drafting.
- Do not use when: the task is general docs or product copy.
-
skills/humanizer- What it is: cleanup pass for tone, rhythm, and less robotic wording.
- Use when: wording is technically fine but reads too AI-ish or stiff.
- Do not use when: the real problem is strategy, structure, or missing facts.
-
skills/forthright- What it is: compression/editing pass that cuts fluff without hiding the point.
- Use when: text is bloated and needs sharper wording.
- Do not use when: the real issue is missing structure or unclear task intent.
-
skills/caveman- What it is: ultra-compressed reply mode.
- Use when: the user wants short, blunt, token-efficient output.
- Do not use when: the reply needs nuance, safety wording, or normal tone.
-
skills/create-skill- What it is: execution harness for building or rewriting a skill folder.
- Use when: a skill shape is already scoped and should be implemented cleanly.
- Do not use when: scope is still fuzzy.
-
skills/dev-harness- What it is: top-level execution-planning harness that turns closed research into an approved implementation contract and routes the work onward.
- Use when: the task needs planning, slicing, approval flow, delegation, or coordinated handoff after research is already closed enough.
- Do not use when: the task still needs broad research/discovery, or when scope is already approved and closed for direct implementation or review.
-
skills/implementation-harness- What it is: direct implementation harness for already-approved work.
- Use when: scope is locked and the main job is execution.
- Do not use when: the task still needs discovery or approval shaping.
-
skills/code-review-orchestrator- What it is: one entrypoint for multi-role code review with merged findings.
- Use when: the user wants a repo, diff, branch, or PR reviewed from one or more specialist angles.
- Do not use when: the main job is pre-implementation planning or direct implementation.
-
skills/research-critic- What it is: reusable pre-implementation Researcher -> Critic workflow that returns a final research verdict.
- Use when: a task needs context closure, assumption pressure, readiness judgment, or structured research before downstream ownership.
- Do not use when: implementation, Architect-owned structural scoping, or PR review should already be happening.
-
skills/grill-me- What it is: scoping/interrogation helper for unclear tasks.
- Use when: the real problem is still figuring out what should be built.
- Do not use when: the work is already scoped enough for
create-skillor implementation.
-
skills/vercel-react-best-practices- What it is: reusable React/Next.js guidance.
- Use when: frontend work touches React/Next.js slices.
- Do not use when: the task is not React/Next.js work.
-
skills/improve-codebase-architecture- What it is: architecture improvement guidance and artifacts.
- Use when: the task is reorganizing structure, boundaries, or architecture records.
- Do not use when: the task is a tiny local fix with no architecture effect.
-
skills/github-ticket-intake- What it is: intake structure for GitHub issue work.
- Use when: the task is turning issue context into actionable scoped work.
- Do not use when: the task is generic writing or implementation already in flight.
-
skills/obsidian- What it is: Obsidian-oriented workflow support.
- Use when: the task touches Obsidian notes/workflows.
- Do not use when: the task has nothing to do with that environment.
Roles are reusable references, not executable skills. Use them when a skill needs a stable specialist identity across phases.
roles/architect- Architecture fit, boundaries, seams, DDD alignment, record updates.
roles/backend- Backend/server implementation and review judgment.
roles/critic- Adversarial pressure on assumptions, scope, risk, and complexity.
roles/dev-rel- Developer-facing framing, positioning, and messaging quality.
roles/frontend- Frontend/client implementation and review judgment.
roles/frontend-taste- Rendered UI taste, hierarchy, spacing, typography, composition, and polish, with routed learnings by project type.
roles/performance- Hot-path, latency, throughput, blocking work, and resource impact.
roles/privacy-data-safety- Local-path leakage, repo-visible private content, retention, and consent safety.
roles/qa-reliability- Failure handling, rollback/recovery, degraded mode, diagnosability, and test signal.
roles/researcher- Research packet building, context closure, ambiguity cleanup, and readiness preparation before critique and downstream ownership.
roles/security- Exploitability, auth, injection, secrets, and trust-boundary risk.
roles/tech-writer- Teaching-oriented technical documentation writing and review.
SPDD-lite.md- What it is: lightweight four-stage repo process doc:
research -> execution plan -> development -> review. - Use when: you need the house workflow and stage boundaries for structured skill work.
- Do not use when: you only need a single skill folder and its own local instructions.
- What it is: lightweight four-stage repo process doc:
-
conventions/repo-architecture-memory.md- What it is: repo-level convention for architecture memory in target repos.
- Use when: a role or skill needs a default rule for context docs, ADRs, context maps, or similar artifacts.
- Do not use when: the task only needs one role's local judgment with no shared memory convention.
-
conventions/repo-design-memory.md- What it is: repo-level convention for design memory in target repos, with a short
DESIGN.mdrouter and downstream design-law files. - Use when: a role or skill needs stable repo-local design law instead of generic taste judgment.
- Do not use when: the task only needs portable taste heuristics with no repo-specific design source of truth.
- What it is: repo-level convention for design memory in target repos, with a short
- Keep
skills/as the source of truth for skill runtime behavior. - Keep
roles/as the source of truth for reusable role references. - Keep
conventions/as the source of truth for repo-level reusable conventions. - Prefer loading/adapting roles from
roles/over copying role prose into skills. - Prefer referencing
conventions/over inventing duplicated repo-wide wording inside one skill. - Do not add extra docs inside a skill folder unless they are part of runtime behavior.
- Do not copy repo/editor docs into a skill unless that content is actually needed at runtime.