Skip to content

Conversation

@samsrabin
Copy link
Contributor

@samsrabin samsrabin commented Jul 2, 2025

Description:

This PR adds an initial toy moss model based on @adrifoster's implementation in UVAFME. It's not yet connected to anything, but it is unit- and functional-tested.

Collaborators:

  • Close collaboration with @adrifoster
  • Discussions with others in the FATES SE meeting

Expectation of Answer Changes:

None

Checklist

All checklist items must be checked to enable merging this pull request:

Contributor

  • The in-code documentation has been updated with descriptive comments
  • The documentation has been assessed to determine if updates are necessary

Integrator

  • FATES PASS/FAIL regression tests were run
  • Evaluation of test results for answer changes was performed and results provided
  • FATES-CLM6 Code Freeze: satellite phenology regression tests are b4b

If satellite phenology regressions are not b4b, please hold merge and notify the FATES development team.

Documentation

Test Results:

CTSM (or) E3SM (specify which) test hash-tag:

CTSM (or) E3SM (specify which) baseline hash-tag:

FATES baseline hash-tag:

Test Output:

adrifoster and others added 30 commits March 19, 2025 09:29
updates to the default parameter file

This update includes a phenology parameter refactor per NGEET#1355, an update
to the default exclusion parameter per NGEET#1358, updates to the logging
parameters to default to clearcut via NGEET#1359, and a minor long name
correction per NGEET#1394.
@samsrabin samsrabin changed the title [WIP] Moss Toy moss model Aug 6, 2025
@samsrabin samsrabin marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2025 16:35
@samsrabin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here are the results of the functional tests at this point:
moss_plot_out_biomass_delta
moss_plot_out_mort
moss_plot_out_resp
moss_plot_out_algf
moss_plot_out_al
moss_plot_out_dlgf

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants