Skip to content

Conversation

@glemieux
Copy link
Contributor

Description:

Collaborators:

Expectation of Answer Changes:

Checklist

If this is your first time contributing, please read the CONTRIBUTING document.

All checklist items must be checked to enable merging this pull request:

Contributor

  • The in-code documentation has been updated with descriptive comments
  • The documentation has been assessed to determine if updates are necessary

Integrator

  • FATES PASS/FAIL regression tests were run
  • Evaluation of test results for answer changes was performed and results provided
  • FATES-CLM6 Code Freeze: satellite phenology regression tests are b4b

If satellite phenology regressions are not b4b, please hold merge and notify the FATES development team.

Documentation

Test Results:

CTSM (or) E3SM (specify which) test hash-tag:

CTSM (or) E3SM (specify which) baseline hash-tag:

FATES baseline hash-tag:

Test Output:

…routine does not sum to the site level"

This reverts commit 11a6977.
…be within the previous patch loop structure"

This reverts commit d2184ee.
…-level bc_out litter variables."

This reverts commit aa269da.
Now that the api type has been passed, make the GetRegistry functions private again
This will need new type data to appropriately update the values
@glemieux glemieux force-pushed the bc-refactor-patchindexing branch from e5f2889 to f9aa65c Compare October 31, 2025 22:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant