Skip to content

Conversation

@FranciscoCardoso913
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@FranciscoCardoso913 FranciscoCardoso913 linked an issue Nov 1, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@render
Copy link

render bot commented Nov 1, 2023

@FranciscoCardoso913 FranciscoCardoso913 marked this pull request as draft November 1, 2023 15:13
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f698ee0) 90.33% compared to head (3ccc871) 90.33%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Current head 3ccc871 differs from pull request most recent head 584c623. Consider uploading reports for the commit 584c623 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #337   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    90.33%   90.33%           
========================================
  Files           54       54           
  Lines         1469     1469           
  Branches       245      245           
========================================
  Hits          1327     1327           
  Misses         137      137           
  Partials         5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@FranciscoCardoso913 FranciscoCardoso913 force-pushed the 328-setup-jsdoc-in-backend branch 2 times, most recently from 1f7a148 to 6618d1c Compare November 1, 2023 16:55
@FranciscoCardoso913 FranciscoCardoso913 force-pushed the 328-setup-jsdoc-in-backend branch from 6618d1c to 3ccc871 Compare November 1, 2023 17:06
@FranciscoCardoso913 FranciscoCardoso913 marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2023 13:07
Copy link
Member

@tomaspalma tomaspalma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

The only thing is to solve the conflicts on the package.json and package.lock.json

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Setup JSDoc in backend

3 participants