docs: Links valid & false positives: add to list #328
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
/ok to test 5b4f7ac |
Signed-off-by: Alex Gronskiy <[email protected]>
agronskiy
force-pushed
the
docs/false_positives
branch
from
5b4f7ac to
c248855
Compare
agronskiy
previously approved these changes
Oct 20, 2025
agronskiy
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
The Problem:
The automated link checker reported 5 broken links, but they all work fine in a web browser.
Why They Failed:
GitHub line anchors (#L232, #L267) - Automated tools struggle to verify these
Complex text fragments (Export-Deploy links with :~:text=) - Advanced URL syntax that checkers can't validate
403 Forbidden (OpenAI docs) - Site blocks automated requests but allows browsers
Rate-limiting tools
The Fix:
Created docs/false_positives.json with all 5 links. The build workflow will now skip checking these specific links since they're known to work but fail automated validation.
File Format:
The file uses newline-delimited JSON (NDJSON) - each link is a separate JSON object on its own line, which is what the FW-CI-templates workflow expects.
The "Check for Unknown broken links" job should now pass