Skip to content

Add hostUsers Container toolkit knonw issue#403

Merged
a-mccarthy merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
a-mccarthy:known-issue-update
May 20, 2026
Merged

Add hostUsers Container toolkit knonw issue#403
a-mccarthy merged 3 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
a-mccarthy:known-issue-update

Conversation

@a-mccarthy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

fixes: #402

Signed-off-by: Abigail McCarthy <20771501+a-mccarthy@users.noreply.github.com>
@a-mccarthy a-mccarthy requested a review from rajathagasthya May 19, 2026 19:11
@a-mccarthy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@rajathagasthya can you review this? Does it make sense to have these details in the Operator release notes, or should be add them into the container toolkit release notes as well?

Is there anyplace else in the docs we should highlight these details?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Documentation preview

https://nvidia.github.io/cloud-native-docs/review/pr-403

Comment thread gpu-operator/release-notes.rst Outdated
Known Issues
------------

* Pod specifications that set ``spec.hostUsers: false`` to enable Kubernetes user namespaces are not supported with GPU Operator v26.3.1.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we've ever supported this; this is not specific to v26.3.1.

Comment thread gpu-operator/release-notes.rst Outdated
Comment on lines +86 to +87
error executing hook `/usr/bin/nvidia-cdi-hook` (exit code: 1)
failed to determined container root: failed to open OCI spec file: ... permission denied
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rajathagasthya rajathagasthya May 19, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We typically don't see this error message unless there are detailed debugging steps involved. The user facing error is actually even less descriptive:

Error: container create failed: read status from sync socket: No such process

Signed-off-by: Abigail McCarthy <20771501+a-mccarthy@users.noreply.github.com>
@a-mccarthy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@rajathagasthya thanks for the review, I've made some updates to the wording here.

I put this into the release notes, but now I'm thinking might be better call out in the CDI page as well, does that make sense?

@rajathagasthya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @a-mccarthy! It makes sense to call out in the CDI page as well.

Signed-off-by: Abigail McCarthy <20771501+a-mccarthy@users.noreply.github.com>
@a-mccarthy a-mccarthy requested a review from rajathagasthya May 20, 2026 16:39
@a-mccarthy a-mccarthy merged commit 09e7da3 into NVIDIA:main May 20, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add note about hostUsers:false known issue

2 participants