Skip to content

[WIP] Restoring backward ABI compatibility with cudaq_solver 0.5.0#4104

Closed
Renaud-K wants to merge 1 commit intoNVIDIA:mainfrom
Renaud-K:jupyternb
Closed

[WIP] Restoring backward ABI compatibility with cudaq_solver 0.5.0#4104
Renaud-K wants to merge 1 commit intoNVIDIA:mainfrom
Renaud-K:jupyternb

Conversation

@Renaud-K
Copy link
Collaborator

@Renaud-K Renaud-K commented Mar 6, 2026

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Renaud Kauffmann <rkauffmann@nvidia.com>
@Renaud-K Renaud-K changed the title Restoring backward ABI compatibility with cudaq_solver 0.5.0 [WIP] Restoring backward ABI compatibility with cudaq_solver 0.5.0 Mar 6, 2026
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": 1,
"execution_count": null,
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did not mean to have this. Not sure how it got there.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like you missed to save the notebook after running it?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

doesn't matter either way - this is something that would be nice to add some scripts for to "sanitize" how notebooks are checked in at some point.

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2026

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

@Renaud-K
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Renaud-K commented Mar 6, 2026

We will not be insuring ABI compatibility between for cudaq 0.14.0 and cudaqx 0.5.0.

@Renaud-K Renaud-K closed this Mar 6, 2026
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2026
}

bool quantum_platform::is_simulator(std::size_t qpu_id) const {
bool quantum_platform::is_simulator(const std::size_t qpu_id) const {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just curious: were these arguments declared const previously?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants