Skip to content

feat: add support for Sentry #3925

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

viictoo
Copy link
Contributor

@viictoo viictoo commented Apr 17, 2025

Add Sentry integration documentation and configuration

  • Added Sentry integration to the mint.json file.
  • Created documentation for Sentry integration, including access requirements, setup guide, and useful links.
  • Added connection instructions for generating an Auth Token for Sentry.
  • Included Sentry logo and images for the documentation.
  • Updated providers.yaml to include Sentry configuration details.
    NOTE
    No verification endpoint: Auth Tokens are scoped

EXT-636

viictoo added 2 commits April 17, 2025 17:58
- Added Sentry integration to the mint.json file.
- Created documentation for Sentry integration, including access requirements, setup guide, and useful links.
- Added connection instructions for generating an Auth Token for Sentry.
- Included Sentry logo and images for the documentation.
- Updated providers.yaml to include Sentry configuration details.
Copy link

linear bot commented Apr 17, 2025

@viictoo viictoo requested a review from hassan254-prog April 17, 2025 15:06
@viictoo viictoo requested a review from a team April 17, 2025 15:22
@hassan254-prog hassan254-prog enabled auto-merge (squash) April 18, 2025 13:55
@hassan254-prog hassan254-prog disabled auto-merge April 18, 2025 13:59
@hassan254-prog hassan254-prog merged commit e652e56 into master Apr 18, 2025
14 checks passed
@hassan254-prog hassan254-prog deleted the victorlangat/ext-636-add-support-for-sentry-api-key branch April 18, 2025 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants