-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
Add generic == error #1853
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add generic == error #1853
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1853 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.14% 88.32% +0.18%
==========================================
Files 119 126 +7
Lines 30019 31766 +1747
==========================================
+ Hits 26460 28058 +1598
- Misses 3559 3708 +149 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
This causes several errors in OscarCI, which actually make me wonder if there is a bug in code there. Perhaps @ThomasBreuer can have a look? For reference this is the error I see in CI: |
O.k. I can reproduce the problem locally, and will create a pull request for Oscar.jl that fixes it. |
|
Note that this does not address all of the problems, since it is still possible to compare elements with the same type but different parents. |
| ############################################################################### | ||
|
|
||
| function Base.:(==)(x::AbstractAlgebra.SetElem, y::AbstractAlgebra.SetElem) | ||
| x === y && return true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've now just added this, to get the tests to run; but this is not meant to preempt any discussion, i.e., we can still remove it again, but I wanted to at least know if with this the OscarCI etc. tests complete or (still) don't.
Closes #1800, resolves oscar-system/Oscar.jl#4107.
This includes only the snippet from #1800 (comment)
cc @joschmitt