Re-design Mempool #593
Open
Re-design Mempool #593
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jan-ferdinand
added
enhancement
|
Just ❤️ already :-) |
Can't promise it's gonna stay like this. A lot of implementation is currently missing. 🤐 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replace the existing mempool (also “transaction pool”) with a new design, as discussed in #567, and reflect 3-step mining (which was always de-facto present) explicitly in the code.
This draft PR is intended as an early review opportunity for all interested parties. In particular, factoring out the now-explicit first step of 3-step mining, “upgrading”, is a non-trivial task: because the step wasn't clearly identified before, it has snuck into various different parts of the codebase.