Skip to content

Re-add new ElectrodesTable neurodata type #624

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 15, 2025
Merged

Re-add new ElectrodesTable neurodata type #624

merged 5 commits into from
May 15, 2025

Conversation

rly
Copy link
Contributor

@rly rly commented May 10, 2025

Summary of changes

Checklist

For all schema changes:

  • Add release notes for the PR to docs/format/source/format_release_notes.rst.
  • Have you included the relevant issue number using "Fix #XXX" notation where XXX is the issue number? By including "Fix #XXX" you allow GitHub to close issue #XXX when the PR is merged.
  • Make sure that hdmf-common-schema points to the latest release and not the latest commit on the main branch.

@rly rly marked this pull request as ready for review May 10, 2025 16:33
@rly
Copy link
Contributor Author

rly commented May 10, 2025

The corresponding PyNWB PR is all green NeurodataWithoutBorders/pynwb#1890

@rly rly requested a review from oruebel May 10, 2025 16:34
@rly rly mentioned this pull request May 10, 2025
Open
@rly rly requested a review from stephprince May 15, 2025 01:10
@rly rly enabled auto-merge (squash) May 15, 2025 01:10
@rly rly merged commit a8127bb into dev May 15, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@rly rly deleted the electrodes_table2 branch May 15, 2025 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@stephprince stephprince stephprince approved these changes

@oruebel oruebel Awaiting requested review from oruebel

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@rly @stephprince