-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Zib-FamilySituation #375
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Zib-FamilySituation #375
Conversation
…utdated known issue
# Conflicts: # release-notes.md
| <type> | ||
| <code value="dateTime" /> | ||
| </type> | ||
| <mapping> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this mapping really justified? The corresponding Observation.component:child.code is 67822003, which indicates the child as a whole; here the value only reflects the birth date, so I'd expect LOINC code 2112-8 (or even better a more specific one) as the accompanying .code. Wouldn't it conceptually be better to have a .component only indicating the child, with an extension to represent the birth date (even though I agree that another extension is not ideal)?
TODO:
Add text explaining why we do not map the MaritalStatus concept.