-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
policies: add Conflict of Interest policy #40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
031f840
6d5811a
8f70c64
9a4c1d6
2732d71
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | ||
# Conflict of Interest Rule | ||
|
||
Purpose: This conflict of interest rule aims to ensure that the foundation operates in an impartial and transparent manner, avoiding any conflicts of interest that may arise due to members' involvement in companies that benefit from the Nix ecosystem. | ||
|
||
Members in this document apply to: | ||
- Each member of the NixOS Foundation, as filled with the Kamer van Koophandel | ||
- Each NixOS Foundation board observer | ||
- Each key employee shall mean employees designated by the Board as a “Key Employee” | ||
|
||
Definition: For the purposes of this rule, a conflict of interest is any situation in which a member's personal, financial, or other interests conflict, or appear to conflict, with the interests of the foundation leading the NixOS project. | ||
|
||
Guidelines: | ||
|
||
1. Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: All members must disclose any conflicts of interest to the foundation's board of directors as soon as they become aware of them. Compensation includes direct and indirect remuneration as well as gifts or favors that are not insubstantial (travel reimbursements are not considered compensation). | ||
|
||
2. Recusal: Members with a conflict of interest must recuse themselves from any decision-making process or vote related to the project where the conflict of interest exists. The recusal should be documented in the project's meeting minutes. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. is there any reason not to upgrade the should to a must be documented? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This could cause reverse problems, where everybody got some swag from company X, and so we all have to recuse ourselves from deciding on something involving that company. The disclosure is more important than the recusal, as it allows other members and the public to place extra scrutiny on the decision. Recusals can be reserved when the interests are too strong, or the decision is very important. |
||
|
||
3. Transparency: Members must disclose any conflicts of interest to the project's community. Members should avoid giving the impression that their personal interests influence the foundation's decision-making process. | ||
|
||
4. Mitigation: Members with a conflict of interest may participate in discussions related to the project but must clearly disclose their conflicts of interest and refrain from advocating for their personal interests. | ||
|
||
5. Consequences: Failure to comply with this conflict of interest rule will result in disciplinary action, including but not limited to removal from the foundation's board of directors. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I like about the OSI document is that it explicitly mentions compensation/gifts, which I think is not as clearly included here.
For example: board member X gets fancy accommodation at the next NixCon paid by company Y (not their employer). This might be seen as a way to influence that board member, and should IMO be disclosed, as long as the gift is not trivial.