fix: Skip maintainer updates that conflict#659
Merged
Erethon merged 1 commit intoNixOS:mainfrom Nov 17, 2025
Merged
Conversation
We're using the github_id as a primary key for the NixMaintainer model which prevents us from updating this field for a specific username and we can't have duplicate usernames either since we have a unique contstraint on them. This "patches" NixOS#658 so ingestion works, until we figure out how to handle NixOS#657.
balsoft
approved these changes
Nov 17, 2025
Member
balsoft
left a comment
balsoft
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's merge this for now and then implement priority for unstable channel in the future
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We're using the github_id as a primary key for the NixMaintainer model which prevents us from updating this field for a specific username and we can't have duplicate usernames either since we have a unique constraint on them.
This "patches" #658 so ingestion works, until we figure out how to handle #657.