-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.4k
Meshroom #216403
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Meshroom #216403
Conversation
|
@davidak I went ahead and created a preliminary PR for Meshroom since I figured you might be interested in the final product. Meshroom itself should work fine with this PR (unless I messed something in this PR during rebasing). |
|
Result of 18 packages marked as broken and skipped:
92 packages failed to build:
46 packages built:
|
it also leads meshroom to fail here you get the full log, with color: i'm also debugging the blocking python tests issue |
|
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/5798 |
|
A new release (first since 2023) of Meshroom has been published last week: |
Description of changes
Preliminary PR, depends on (and contains) the following PRs:
tbb: Split into tbb_2020_3 and tbb_2021_8 #215689tbb: Split into tbb_2020_3 and tbb_2021_8 #217585Fixes #94127.
Things done
sandbox = trueset innix.conf? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)