-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.6k
Modular services #372170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Modular services #372170
Changes from all commits
08f0e14
1bff253
7e792e9
d0eeba2
2cdaf72
bec3691
d0079fa
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
# Modular Services {#modular-services} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status: in development. This functionality is new in NixOS 25.05, and significant changes should be expected. We'd love to hear your feedback in <https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/372170> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Traditionally, NixOS services were defined using sets of options *in* modules, not *as* modules. This made them non-modular, resulting in problems with composability, reuse, and portability. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
A configuration management framework is an application of `evalModules` with the `class` and `specialArgs` input attribute set to particular values. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
NixOS is such a configuration management framework, and so are [Home Manager](https://github.com/nix-community/home-manager) and [`nix-darwin`](https://github.com/lnl7/nix-darwin). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The service management component of a configuration management framework is the set of module options that connects Nix expressions with the underlying service (or process) manager. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For NixOS this is the module wrapping [`systemd`](https://systemd.io/), on `nix-darwin` this is the module wrapping [`launchd`](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Launchd). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
A *modular service* is a [module] that defines values for a core set of options declared in the service management component of a configuration management framework, including which program to run. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Since it's a module, it can be composed with other modules via `imports` to extend its functionality. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
NixOS provides two options into which such modules can be plugged: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
- `system.services.<name>` | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- an option for user services (TBD) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crucially, these options have the type [`attrsOf`] [`submodule`]. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The name of the service is the attribute name corresponding to `attrsOf`. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
<!-- ^ This is how composition is *always* provided, instead of a difficult thing (but this is reference docs, not a changelog) --> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The `submodule` is pre-loaded with two modules: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- a generic module that is intended to be portable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- a module with systemd-specific options, whose values or defaults derive from the generic module's option values. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
So note that the default value of `system.services.<name>` is not a complete service. It requires that the user provide a value, and this is typically done by importing a module. For example: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
<!-- Not using typical example syntax, because reading this is *not* optional, and should it should not be folded closed. --> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
```nix | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
{ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
roberth marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
system.services.my-service-instance = { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
imports = [ pkgs.some-application.services.some-service-module ]; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
foo.settings = { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
# ... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
}; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
}; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
``` | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Tell me if this should be a PR-towards-PR-branch instead, it felt short enough to discuss as a suggestion. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I discussed this with @roberth in person a bit more in-depth, here's the take-away: There should be a documented convention that generated files should be put in their own option, for the purpose of being able to override it, but:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
## Portability {#modular-service-portability} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is possible to write service modules that are portable. This is done by either avoiding the `systemd` option tree, or by defining process-manager-specific definitions in an optional way: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
```nix | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This needs some verbal annotation that this is a service module, because given the introduction so far it's not easy to figure out just from the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Haven't heard of that. Can't find anything about examples, markdown or commonmark in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/doc/README.md#admonitions By annotation I mean simply freeform text contained in the example block. And again, that examples are rendered collapsed by default is simply a misfeature and I've seen it in different places on the web recently, no clue why people would by default ignore the most important parts of documentation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
{ config, options, lib, ... }: { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
_class = "service"; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
config = { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
process.executable = "${lib.getExe config.foo.program}"; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
} // lib.optionalAttrs (options?systemd) { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
# ... systemd-specific definitions ... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
}; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
``` | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
This way, the module can be loaded into a configuration manager that does not use systemd, and the `systemd` definitions will be ignored. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Similarly, other configuration managers can declare their own options for services to customize. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
## Composition and Ownership {#modular-service-composition} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compared to traditional services, modular services are inherently more composable, by virtue of being modules and receiving a user-provided name when imported. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
However, composition can not end there, because services need to be able to interact with each other. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
This can be achieved in two ways: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Users can link services together by providing the necessary NixOS configuration. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Services can be compositions of other services. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
These aren't mutually exclusive. In fact, it is a good practice when developing services to first write them as individual services, and then compose them into a higher-level composition. Each of these services is a valid modular service, including their composition. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
## Migration {#modular-service-migration} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Many services could be migrated to the modular service system, but even when the modular service system is mature, it is not necessary to migrate all services. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For instance, many system-wide services are a mandatory part of a desktop system, and it doesn't make sense to have multiple instances of them. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Moving their logic into separate Nix files may still be beneficial for the efficient evaluation of configurations that don't use those services, but that is a rather minor benefit, unless modular services potentially become the standard way to define services. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
<!-- TODO example of a single-instance service --> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
## Portable Service Options {#modular-service-options-portable} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
```{=include=} options | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
id-prefix: service-opt- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
list-id: service-options | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
source: @PORTABLE_SERVICE_OPTIONS@ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
``` | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
## Systemd-specific Service Options {#modular-service-options-systemd} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
```{=include=} options | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
id-prefix: systemd-service-opt- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
list-id: systemd-service-options | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
source: @SYSTEMD_SERVICE_OPTIONS@ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
``` | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
[module]: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/index.html#module-system | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
<!-- TODO: more anchors --> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
[`attrsOf`]: #sec-option-types-composed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
[`submodule`]: #sec-option-types-submodule |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ | ||
|
||
# Modular Services | ||
|
||
This directory defines a modular service infrastructure for NixOS. | ||
See the [Modular Services chapter] in the manual [[source]](../../doc/manual/development/modular-services.md). | ||
|
||
[Modular Services chapter]: https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/unstable/#modular-services | ||
|
||
# Design decision log | ||
|
||
- `system.services.<name>`. Alternatives considered | ||
- `systemServices`: similar to does not allow importing a composition of services into `system`. Not sure if that's a good idea in the first place, but I've kept the possibility open. | ||
- `services.abstract`: used in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/267111, but too weird. Service modules should fit naturally into the configuration system. | ||
Also "abstract" is wrong, because it has submodules - in other words, evalModules results, concrete services - not abstract at all. | ||
- `services.modular`: only slightly better than `services.abstract`, but still weird | ||
|
||
- No `daemon.*` options. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/267111/files#r1723206521 | ||
|
||
- For now, do not add an `enable` option, because it's ambiguous. Does it disable at the Nix level (not generate anything) or at the systemd level (generate a service that is disabled)? | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. +1 to keep the distinction. I had cases where I wanted one or the other. |
||
|
||
- Move all process options into a `process` option tree. Putting this at the root is messy, because we also have sub-services at that level. Those are rather distinct. Grouping them "by kind" should raise fewer questions. | ||
|
||
- `modules/system/service/systemd/system.nix` has `system` twice. Not great, but | ||
- they have different meanings | ||
1. These are system-provided modules, provided by the configuration manager | ||
2. `systemd/system` configures SystemD _system units_. | ||
- This reserves `modules/service` for actual service modules, at least until those are lifted out of NixOS, potentially | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
{ lib, ... }: | ||
let | ||
inherit (lib) concatLists mapAttrsToList showOption; | ||
in | ||
rec { | ||
flattenMapServicesConfigToList = | ||
f: loc: config: | ||
f loc config | ||
++ concatLists ( | ||
mapAttrsToList ( | ||
k: v: | ||
flattenMapServicesConfigToList f ( | ||
loc | ||
++ [ | ||
"services" | ||
k | ||
] | ||
) v | ||
) config.services | ||
); | ||
|
||
getWarnings = flattenMapServicesConfigToList ( | ||
loc: config: map (msg: "in ${showOption loc}: ${msg}") config.warnings | ||
); | ||
|
||
getAssertions = flattenMapServicesConfigToList ( | ||
loc: config: | ||
map (ass: { | ||
message = "in ${showOption loc}: ${ass.message}"; | ||
assertion = ass.assertion; | ||
}) config.assertions | ||
); | ||
} |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ | ||
{ | ||
lib, | ||
config, | ||
options, | ||
... | ||
}: | ||
let | ||
inherit (lib) mkOption types; | ||
pathOrStr = types.coercedTo types.path (x: "${x}") types.str; | ||
program = | ||
types.coercedTo ( | ||
types.package | ||
// { | ||
# require mainProgram for this conversion | ||
check = v: v.type or null == "derivation" && v ? meta.mainProgram; | ||
} | ||
Comment on lines
+12
to
+16
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Style nit: Putting this in a variable would improve readability (though also negligibly decrease performance) |
||
) lib.getExe pathOrStr | ||
// { | ||
description = "main program, path or command"; | ||
descriptionClass = "conjunction"; | ||
}; | ||
in | ||
{ | ||
# https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/unstable/#modular-services | ||
_class = "service"; | ||
imports = [ | ||
../../../misc/assertions.nix | ||
]; | ||
options = { | ||
services = mkOption { | ||
type = types.attrsOf ( | ||
types.submoduleWith { | ||
modules = [ | ||
./service.nix | ||
]; | ||
} | ||
); | ||
description = '' | ||
A collection of [modular services](https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/unstable/#modular-services) that are configured in one go. | ||
|
||
You could consider the sub-service relationship to be an ownership relation. | ||
It **does not** automatically create any other relationship between services (e.g. systemd slices), unless perhaps such a behavior is explicitly defined and enabled in another option. | ||
''; | ||
default = { }; | ||
visible = "shallow"; | ||
}; | ||
process = { | ||
executable = mkOption { | ||
type = program; | ||
description = '' | ||
The path to the executable that will be run when the service is started. | ||
''; | ||
}; | ||
args = lib.mkOption { | ||
type = types.listOf pathOrStr; | ||
description = '' | ||
Arguments to pass to the `executable`. | ||
''; | ||
default = [ ]; | ||
}; | ||
}; | ||
}; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That examples are closed by default is a skin issue, not a semantic issue. No one forces us to fold examples into
<details>
tags.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, but I have to work with the tools I'm given.
Did you mean to provide a suggestion or is this fyi?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about this?: an example is meant to be fully formed thing, whereas this here is just fancy pseudocode and not a true example because it is not a complete application of the subject discussed.