antigravity: rename to antigravity-ide by schembriaiden · Pull Request #522168 · NixOS/nixpkgs

schembriaiden · 2026-05-20T07:49:38Z

Changelog:

Things done

Zaczero

didnt build/run, reviewed the diff alone

Zaczero · 2026-05-20T09:32:08Z

+    strictDeps = true;
+    __structuredAttrs = true;


why is that

This was failing: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/26149017700/job/76911501762?pr=522168

khaneliman · 2026-05-20T13:01:01Z

`nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 522168
Commit: 34cec59d112b292306645dca556244a71e24fb05

`x86_64-linux`

✅ 2 packages built:

antigravity-ide
antigravity-ide-fhs

`aarch64-linux`

✅ 2 packages built:

antigravity-ide
antigravity-ide-fhs

`aarch64-darwin`

✅ 1 package built:

antigravity-ide

khaneliman · 2026-05-20T13:01:44Z

Thanks, was just catching up on Google IO announcements and came looking to see if these PRs existed, appreciate it.

deftdawg · 2026-05-21T11:23:29Z

I'm not sure about this rename, 2.0.0 removes the "IDE" part from Antigravity, it's basically a chat window now. 😞

EDIT: my bad, google officially renamed it to -ide to distinguish from -cli (replacing gemini-cli) ... it's unfortunate they removed almost all of the ide features out of it to make it into a poor clone of codex.

schembriaiden · 2026-05-21T11:25:42Z

I'm not sure about this rename, 2.0.0 removes the "IDE" part from Antigravity, it's basically a chat window now. 😞

https://antigravity.google/product/antigravity-ide

khaneliman · 2026-05-21T12:14:43Z

I'm not sure about this rename, 2.0.0 removes the "IDE" part from Antigravity, it's basically a chat window now. 😞

EDIT: my bad, google officially renamed it to -ide to distinguish from -cli (replacing gemini-cli) ... it's unfortunate they removed almost all of the ide features out of it to make it into a poor clone of codex.

They also butchered the cli and made it closed source. Not much good in the antigravity world atm

schembriaiden · 2026-05-22T09:03:04Z

`nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using nixpkgs-review-gha

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 522168
Commit: da23e1455420389731fc6b9b757dd3608db9ee25 (subsequent changes)
Merge: 8d4e798bccdc4aadfe20700aedeb41542d180d4f

Logs: https://github.com/schembriaiden/nixpkgs-review-gha/actions/runs/26277506997

`x86_64-linux`

✅ 12 packages built:

antigravity-ide
antigravity-ide-fhs
code-cursor
code-cursor-fhs
kiro
kiro-fhs
vscode
vscode-fhs
vscode-with-extensions
vscodium
vscodium-fhs
windsurf

`aarch64-linux`

✅ 9 packages built:

antigravity-ide
antigravity-ide-fhs
code-cursor
code-cursor-fhs
vscode
vscode-fhs
vscode-with-extensions
vscodium
vscodium-fhs

`x86_64-darwin` (sandbox = relaxed)

❌ 1 package failed to build:

kiro

✅ 6 packages built:

antigravity-ide
code-cursor
vscode
vscode-with-extensions
vscodium
windsurf

kiro

structuredAttrs is enabled
Running phase: unpackPhase
@nix { "action": "setPhase", "phase": "unpackPhase" }
unpacking source archive /nix/store/0ryfvx3q8yhw4m37hpmj0ik1rb5jb5yb-kiro-ide-0.12.200-stable-darwin-x64.dmg
do not know how to unpack source archive /nix/store/0ryfvx3q8yhw4m37hpmj0ik1rb5jb5yb-kiro-ide-0.12.200-stable-darwin-x64.dmg

`aarch64-darwin` (sandbox = relaxed)

❌ 1 package failed to build:

kiro

✅ 6 packages built:

antigravity-ide
code-cursor
vscode
vscode-with-extensions
vscodium
windsurf

kiro

structuredAttrs is enabled
Running phase: unpackPhase
@nix { "action": "setPhase", "phase": "unpackPhase" }
unpacking source archive /nix/store/rxxgs0kb2j95h58c8qlddqv2izqcnql1-kiro-ide-0.12.200-stable-darwin-arm64.dmg
do not know how to unpack source archive /nix/store/rxxgs0kb2j95h58c8qlddqv2izqcnql1-kiro-ide-0.12.200-stable-darwin-arm64.dmg

xiaoxiangmoe · 2026-05-22T12:11:18Z

-      fhs = fhs { };
-      fhsWithPackages = f: fhs { additionalPkgs = f; };
+      fhs = (fhs { }).overrideAttrs (old: {
+        strictDeps = true;


Why not just change config in pkgs/applications/editors/vscode

I'm not sure I get what you mean, isn't this edit in pkgs/applications/editors/vscode?

Actually is this actually needed? You added stucturedAtrrs and stictdeps above, doesn't fhs intherits it?

Actually is this actually needed? You added stucturedAtrrs and stictdeps above, doesn't fhs intherits it?

Seems to fail without them:

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/26289931300/job/77387260084?pr=522168

The build log says this isn't the right place for this change:

> - Attribute `pkgs.antigravity-ide-fhs` is a new package with `strictDeps` unset or set to `false`. > Please enable `strictDeps = true;` in pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix. > (NPV-164) > - Attribute `pkgs.antigravity-ide-fhs` is a new package with `__structuredAttrs` unset or set to `false`. > Please enable `__structuredAttrs = true;` in pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix.

The build log says this isn't the right place for this change:

It was like that before this request:

#522168 (comment)

There should be a better way to inherit them in builder, without overrideAttrs. New instances of overrideAttrs shouldn't be introduced

There should be a better way to inherit them in builder, without overrideAttrs. New instances of overrideAttrs shouldn't be introduced

The only other way I can think of right now is adding something like this to the build-fhs-env-bubblewrap/default.nix:

// lib.optionalAttrs (args ? strictDeps) { inherit (args) strictDeps; } // lib.optionalAttrs (args ? __structuredAttrs) { inherit (args) __structuredAttrs; }

I don't know if this is preferred?

BohdanTkachenko · 2026-05-29T04:28:26Z

I gave the PR a try and hit a problem with the agent, but I think I've found the fix (using Antigravity itself) — sharing in case it's useful.

language_server_linux_x64 (the agent backend) re-execs itself inside Antigravity's own nsjail at runtime. The jail spins up a fresh mount namespace and bind-mounts only host /lib, /lib64, /usr, /bin plus every directory on $PATH — nothing else from the store. The autoPatchelfHook'd interpreter is a /nix/store glibc path that's on none of those, so it dies with:

execve('…/language_server_linux_x64'): No such file or directory

and once that's past, the agent's shell-outs fail identically: exec: "bash": executable file not found in $PATH.

With the current FHS-based packaging the agent can't run anything; every command tool call comes back as:

error executing cascade step: CORTEX_STEP_TYPE_RUN_COMMAND: read unix @ -> @: recvmsg: connection reset by peer
… failed to check terminal shell support: internal: internal error

which is the user-facing face of the execve crash above. FHS doesn't fix it because the crashing binary runs inside the nested nsjail, whose mount set is fixed (host /lib//lib64 + $PATH dirs) and which the FHS wrapper doesn't extend into — targetPkgs and the FHS /usr//lib never reach the sandboxed process. FHS can't even help indirectly: the patched interpreter is a store path, and FHS doesn't put store paths on $PATH. Since $PATH is the only thing the jail picks up from the environment, that's where the fix has to land.

Putting /nix/store on $PATH bind-mounts the whole store into the jail, so the interpreter and every tool/lib resolve with no per-binary patching:

.overrideAttrs (oldAttrs: {
  preFixup = (oldAttrs.preFixup or "") + ''
    gappsWrapperArgs+=( --prefix PATH : "/nix/store" )
  '';
})

Verified: the agent starts and its terminal runs arbitrary tools (git, jj, nix, …).

P.S. FYI the same issue affects antigravity-hub. The fix is also the same - 7b88d0f

nixpkgs-ci Bot requested review from Zaczero and xiaoxiangmoe May 20, 2026 07:54

nixpkgs-ci Bot added 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-darwin: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Darwin. labels May 20, 2026

schembriaiden force-pushed the antigravity--rename-to-antigravity-ide branch 4 times, most recently from 0fdbb02 to 858ba6f Compare May 20, 2026 08:14

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view

schembriaiden force-pushed the antigravity--rename-to-antigravity-ide branch from 858ba6f to 34cec59 Compare May 20, 2026 08:48

Zaczero approved these changes May 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

nixpkgs-ci Bot added 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in any of the changed packages. labels May 20, 2026

khaneliman approved these changes May 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

nixpkgs-ci Bot added 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons. and removed 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. labels May 20, 2026

xiaoxiangmoe reviewed May 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread pkgs/by-name/an/antigravity-ide/package.nix Outdated

schembriaiden force-pushed the antigravity--rename-to-antigravity-ide branch 2 times, most recently from 3ce5c01 to da23e14 Compare May 22, 2026 08:35

nixpkgs-ci Bot requested review from JeffLabonte, aspauldingcode, bobby285271, eadwu and jamesward May 22, 2026 08:42

nixpkgs-ci Bot requested review from JohnRTitor, Prince213, Vuks69, oenu, qweered, sarahec and yuannan May 22, 2026 08:42

schembriaiden requested a review from xiaoxiangmoe May 22, 2026 08:47

xiaoxiangmoe reviewed May 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

schembriaiden force-pushed the antigravity--rename-to-antigravity-ide branch 2 times, most recently from c37e95e to be61cfe Compare May 22, 2026 13:18

khaneliman reviewed May 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread pkgs/applications/editors/vscode/generic.nix

schembriaiden added 2 commits May 22, 2026 23:49

vscode: add strictDeps and structuredAttrs

797a3cd

antigravity: rename to antigravity-ide

f625271

schembriaiden force-pushed the antigravity--rename-to-antigravity-ide branch from be61cfe to f625271 Compare May 22, 2026 21:55

BohdanTkachenko mentioned this pull request May 26, 2026

nixos/antigravity: init module #510915

Open

13 tasks

BohdanTkachenko mentioned this pull request May 29, 2026

antigravity-hub: init at 2.2.1 #524225

Open

14 tasks

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Conversation

schembriaiden commented May 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Things done

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as outdated.

Zaczero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

khaneliman commented May 20, 2026

nixpkgs-review result

x86_64-linux

aarch64-linux

aarch64-darwin

Uh oh!

khaneliman commented May 20, 2026

Uh oh!

deftdawg commented May 21, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

schembriaiden commented May 21, 2026

Uh oh!

khaneliman commented May 21, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

schembriaiden commented May 22, 2026

nixpkgs-review result

x86_64-linux

aarch64-linux

x86_64-darwin (sandbox = relaxed)

aarch64-darwin (sandbox = relaxed)

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

schembriaiden May 22, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

BohdanTkachenko commented May 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants

schembriaiden commented May 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`nixpkgs-review` result

`x86_64-linux`

`aarch64-linux`

`aarch64-darwin`

deftdawg commented May 21, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`nixpkgs-review` result

`x86_64-linux`

`aarch64-linux`

`x86_64-darwin` (sandbox = relaxed)

`aarch64-darwin` (sandbox = relaxed)

schembriaiden May 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading

BohdanTkachenko commented May 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading