Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 8, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@zoeyTM
Copy link
Contributor

@zoeyTM zoeyTM commented Nov 20, 2024

resolves #830

@zoeyTM zoeyTM requested review from alcuadrado and kanej November 20, 2024 09:01
Copy link
Member

@kanej kanej left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets add a test explicitly for bigints in the parameters of a transaction.

@zoeyTM zoeyTM requested a review from kanej November 21, 2024 14:28
To ensure we work with nested parameters we use a replacer function on
stringify, rather than swapping out individual params.
Copy link
Member

@kanej kanej left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we could consider exploring other ways of out putting the params in the future rather than stringify. We convert bigints to strings here in a way that may be un-intuitive to users.

@zoeyTM zoeyTM merged commit e10621b into development Nov 22, 2024
5 checks passed
@zoeyTM zoeyTM deleted the fix/bigint-txs branch November 22, 2024 05:39
@zoeyTM zoeyTM mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

New ignition transactions command is unable to serialize BigInt

3 participants