Skip to content

Conversation

Ricardoalso
Copy link

@Ricardoalso Ricardoalso commented Jul 2, 2025

On top of the migration I cherry-picked the commit present in the following PR (V14) #792

yvaucher and others added 30 commits May 26, 2025 10:03
- change name to batch to match with change of `picking_dispatch` name to
`stock_batch_picking`
- mode description in README.rst
- move files in models and views directories
- change headers to small license header
- use api 8.0
- fix and improve tests
the field has been renamed in the base module
Probably due to usage of multiple environment and cache. datas can't be
read from shipping.label but it can be read from ir.attachment
When there is more than 1 pack in a picking, 2 or more thread worker
might be in concurrence on the same picking, which makes one of the
transaction fails, resulting in the abort of the whole label generation.

The solution implemented is to change the way of passing the tasks to
the thread workers. Instead of passing a label at a time, we pass a
group of label. A group of label actually contains all the labels to
generate for one picking.
The support of picking without packages has been dropped following the RFC OCA#192

Since ffaab97 commit `base_delivery_carrier_label` force the usage of
packages.
kv1612 and others added 27 commits May 26, 2025 10:03
The threading option doesn't work in test mode but was not tested
because labels were already generated in the test.
Using a condition to use different threads only when test mode
is not activated allows to test label generation.
Sometimes, when regenerating labels from third party API, we could not get the
new tracking references. And then as we do not purge tracking references
correctly, previous ones are kept and lead to incoherences (batch picking
tracking references emptied but labels still existing). For this we need to
manually purge references when asking for full regeneration.
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: delivery-carrier-14.0/delivery-carrier-14.0-delivery_carrier_label_batch
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/delivery-carrier-14-0/delivery-carrier-14-0-delivery_carrier_label_batch/
Currently translated at 2.8% (1 of 35 strings)

Translation: delivery-carrier-14.0/delivery-carrier-14.0-delivery_carrier_label_batch
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/delivery-carrier-14-0/delivery-carrier-14-0-delivery_carrier_label_batch/es/
Currently translated at 100.0% (35 of 35 strings)

Translation: delivery-carrier-14.0/delivery-carrier-14.0-delivery_carrier_label_batch
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/delivery-carrier-14-0/delivery-carrier-14-0-delivery_carrier_label_batch/es/
…er_code`

    This line has been added by OCA@3b0232d but it looks like the field carrier_code has never been added to the model (or at least it has never been merged in the OCA repo?), thus we get following error when updating the ``carrier_id``:
    ```
    [...]
      File "/odoo/src/addons/web/models/models.py", line 1005, in onchange
        record._apply_onchange_methods(field_name, result)
      File "/odoo/src/odoo/models.py", line 7364, in _apply_onchange_methods
        res = method(self)
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^
      File "/odoo/external-src/delivery-carrier/delivery_carrier_label_batch/models/stock_batch_picking.py", line 61, in onchange_carrier_id
        self.carrier_code = self.carrier_id.code
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    AttributeError: 'stock.picking.batch' object has no attribute 'carrier_code'

    The above server error caused the following client error:
    RPC_ERROR: Odoo Server Error
        RPC_ERROR
            at makeErrorFromResponse (http://localhost:8069/web/assets/e5ed061/web.assets_web.min.js:3144:163)
            at XMLHttpRequest.<anonymous> (http://localhost:8069/web/assets/e5ed061/web.assets_web.min.js:3149:13)
    ```
… by ``UserError.args[0]``

In the label generation, when getting an error, we were using its ``name``, however, this is deprecated since a while and as been removed in odoo/odoo@d200dcf.
We should use ``args[0]`` instead.
… handling

use new environment context for tracking reference purge and avoid side effects on labels regeneration
@Ricardoalso Ricardoalso marked this pull request as draft July 2, 2025 13:26
@Ricardoalso
Copy link
Author

Commits were directly pushed into the MIG PR #984 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.