-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 385
[18.0][FIX] delivery_carrier_label_batch: new environmenent execution ordering leads to side effects on labels regeneration #1032
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Ricardoalso
wants to merge
64
commits into
OCA:18.0
from
camptocamp:18-fix-label-regeneration-on-new-env
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- change name to batch to match with change of `picking_dispatch` name to `stock_batch_picking` - mode description in README.rst - move files in models and views directories - change headers to small license header - use api 8.0 - fix and improve tests
the field has been renamed in the base module
Probably due to usage of multiple environment and cache. datas can't be read from shipping.label but it can be read from ir.attachment
When there is more than 1 pack in a picking, 2 or more thread worker might be in concurrence on the same picking, which makes one of the transaction fails, resulting in the abort of the whole label generation. The solution implemented is to change the way of passing the tasks to the thread workers. Instead of passing a label at a time, we pass a group of label. A group of label actually contains all the labels to generate for one picking.
Co-Authored-By: Alexandre Fayolle <[email protected]>
The threading option doesn't work in test mode but was not tested because labels were already generated in the test. Using a condition to use different threads only when test mode is not activated allows to test label generation.
Co-authored-by: Hai Lang <[email protected]>
Sometimes, when regenerating labels from third party API, we could not get the new tracking references. And then as we do not purge tracking references correctly, previous ones are kept and lead to incoherences (batch picking tracking references emptied but labels still existing). For this we need to manually purge references when asking for full regeneration.
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: delivery-carrier-14.0/delivery-carrier-14.0-delivery_carrier_label_batch Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/delivery-carrier-14-0/delivery-carrier-14-0-delivery_carrier_label_batch/
Currently translated at 2.8% (1 of 35 strings) Translation: delivery-carrier-14.0/delivery-carrier-14.0-delivery_carrier_label_batch Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/delivery-carrier-14-0/delivery-carrier-14-0-delivery_carrier_label_batch/es/
Currently translated at 100.0% (35 of 35 strings) Translation: delivery-carrier-14.0/delivery-carrier-14.0-delivery_carrier_label_batch Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/delivery-carrier-14-0/delivery-carrier-14-0-delivery_carrier_label_batch/es/
…er_code` This line has been added by OCA@3b0232d but it looks like the field carrier_code has never been added to the model (or at least it has never been merged in the OCA repo?), thus we get following error when updating the ``carrier_id``: ``` [...] File "/odoo/src/addons/web/models/models.py", line 1005, in onchange record._apply_onchange_methods(field_name, result) File "/odoo/src/odoo/models.py", line 7364, in _apply_onchange_methods res = method(self) ^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/odoo/external-src/delivery-carrier/delivery_carrier_label_batch/models/stock_batch_picking.py", line 61, in onchange_carrier_id self.carrier_code = self.carrier_id.code ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ AttributeError: 'stock.picking.batch' object has no attribute 'carrier_code' The above server error caused the following client error: RPC_ERROR: Odoo Server Error RPC_ERROR at makeErrorFromResponse (http://localhost:8069/web/assets/e5ed061/web.assets_web.min.js:3144:163) at XMLHttpRequest.<anonymous> (http://localhost:8069/web/assets/e5ed061/web.assets_web.min.js:3149:13) ```
… by ``UserError.args[0]`` In the label generation, when getting an error, we were using its ``name``, however, this is deprecated since a while and as been removed in odoo/odoo@d200dcf. We should use ``args[0]`` instead.
… handling use new environment context for tracking reference purge and avoid side effects on labels regeneration
Commits were directly pushed into the MIG PR #984 (comment) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On top of the migration I cherry-picked the commit present in the following PR (V14) #792