Skip to content

Revert "[15][PORT] sale_quotation_number: allow customizable quotation sequence"#3416

Merged
OCA-git-bot merged 1 commit intoOCA:15.0from
sygel-technology:15.0-fix-sale_quotation_number
Nov 20, 2024
Merged

Revert "[15][PORT] sale_quotation_number: allow customizable quotation sequence"#3416
OCA-git-bot merged 1 commit intoOCA:15.0from
sygel-technology:15.0-fix-sale_quotation_number

Conversation

@manuelregidor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR reverts commit df94b4d, which generates the problems pointed out here: #3310 (comment)

This revert is only applied to v15, as it is the only version in which module sale_quotation_number already dealt with the issues explained in the PR #3310.

I-6628

@manuelregidor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@HaraldPanten Could you review, please?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@HaraldPanten HaraldPanten left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's revert it while a solution without regressions is found.

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it!
Prepared branch 15.0-ocabot-merge-pr-3416-by-pedrobaeza-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@HaraldPanten
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Let's revert it while a solution without regressions is found.

/ocabot merge patch

THX!

@CRogos This PR is important for you. Please, have a look at that.

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at a897942. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@HaraldPanten HaraldPanten deleted the 15.0-fix-sale_quotation_number branch November 20, 2024 09:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants