[16.0][MIG] stock_valuation_fifo_lot: Migration to 16.0 by AungKoKoLin1997 · Pull Request #1676 · OCA/stock-logistics-workflow

AungKoKoLin1997 · 2024-08-20T11:05:03Z

Superseding of #1527

In this PR, I address the following points:

Standard migration
Improved code by using the Odoo standard function _get_fifo_candidates() and adjustments to _get_price_unit()
Fixed the issue proposed in [15.0][ADD] stock_valuation_fifo_lot #1350 (comment)
Avoid completely overriding _run_fifo() and use the standard behavior.
Update the product's standard price to the first available lot price.
Improve _get_price_unit() to retrieve the value from the most recent incoming move line for the lot for the No PO (e.g. customer returns) stock moves.
Add quantity and value-related fields in stock_move_line to cover all cases including multiple lots exist in an SVL record, and it is unclear which lot's remaining quantity is being delivered(Eg. Receive serials 001, 002 and 003 for an incoming move. Deliver 002, return 002 and deliver 002 again.)
Add force_fifo_lot_id in stock_move_line to handle cases where a delivery needs to be made for an existing lot created before the installation of this module (e.g., lots 001 and 002 were received, lot 002 was delivered before the module's installation, and lot 001 is delivered after the module is installed).
Add a post_init_hook to update the lot_ids in SVL for existing records and to update the field values in existing stock_move_line records.

Depends on odoo/odoo#180245
@qrtl QT4650

AungKoKoLin1997 · 2024-08-21T05:07:27Z

Test failed from stock_picking_line_sequence is fixed at #1557.

AungKoKoLin1997 · 2024-08-21T08:47:54Z

@matt454357
Can you please review this PR and bring your ideas from your module OCA/stock-logistics-warehouse#2139 as we talked?

matt454357 · 2024-08-21T13:48:23Z

I started a review, and will post some suggestions.

AungKoKoLin1997 · 2024-08-22T01:51:09Z

@matt454357
What I am thinking is that I will handle adding the option for a single lot/serial per SVL record or multiple lots/serials per SVL record in this PR (since some users may not need a single lot/serial per SVL).

After you review and the PR is merged, you can create a new PR to follow up on your idea.
Or would you prefer to include your idea as a new commit in this PR by creating a PR in our repository?

What do you think?

AungKoKoLin1997 · 2024-08-22T06:59:07Z

I will handle adding the option for a single lot/serial per SVL record or multiple lots/serials per SVL record in this PR (since some users may not need a single lot/serial per SVL).

@matt454357 I will not add this enhancement in the current PR because it is not related to migration, and there is no use case with the current design. So, could you please handle this when you work on revaluation?

matt454357 · 2024-08-22T18:33:23Z

I think it's a good idea to finish this migration PR, and then do a follow up PR. And, I'm happy to do the follow up PR. However, there a couple of problems with allowing multiple lots/serials per SVL.

Maybe this initial migration should prevent revaluation of tracked products?

Maybe also raise an error when _get_price_unit() is called with multiple lot_ids?

matt454357 · 2024-08-22T18:46:23Z

The believe PR #1677 supports the idea of enforcing single lot/serial per SVL.

matt454357

I'm just commenting on this PR, not suggesting that we make these changes immediately.

matt454357 · 2024-08-22T17:53:26Z

+    "license": "AGPL-3",
+    "author": "Ecosoft, Odoo Community Association (OCA)",
+    "website": "https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-workflow",
+    "depends": ["stock_account", "stock_no_negative", "mrp_landed_costs"],


I'm not sure we should depend on mrp_landed_costs. Could that be handled in a separate module?

matt454357 · 2024-08-22T18:03:14Z

Maybe move to a separate module?

Yes. I will handle it.

matt454357 · 2024-08-22T18:25:58Z

+        if not self.company_id.use_lot_get_price_unit_fifo:
+            return super()._get_price_unit()
+        if (
+            not self.purchase_line_id


Depends on purchase module, which I guess is okay.

I added hasattr(self, "purchase_line_id") in the conditon. So, there is no issue I guess.

matt454357 · 2024-08-22T18:34:39Z

+        if (
+            not self.purchase_line_id
+            and self.product_id.cost_method == "fifo"
+            and len(self.lot_ids) == 1


Should we raise an error when len(self.lot_ids) > 1?

Do you have any concerns or inconveniences if we use Odoo's standard behavior for this case?

Should we raise an error when len(self.lot_ids) > 1?

I think we could make it configurable if the community requires it. I don't have a strong need for that at the moment.

Okay, single lot per SVL would not work when migrating/installing with existing data. So, I don't think we can do that.

AungKoKoLin1997 · 2024-08-23T01:25:31Z

I think it's a good idea to finish this migration PR, and then do a follow up PR. And, I'm happy to do the follow up PR. However, there a couple of problems with allowing multiple lots/serials per SVL.

Thanks for the pointer and your interest in following up. What do you think of my idea of adding an option to choose a single or multiple lot/serial per SVL? As I mentioned, I don't want to make this adjustment in the migration PR because it would make the module bigger, and the community might be less interested in reviewing it. So, my idea is to get this PR merged quickly and then follow up with the changes.

matt454357 · 2024-08-23T04:07:57Z

Yes, keep this PR small.

Regarding the option to choose between multiple or single lot per SVL: I'm not sure why someone would want multiple, but it sounds like you have a use case in mind. So, I suppose it's fine, as long as we raise errors for the issues described above.

AungKoKoLin1997 · 2024-08-23T09:14:13Z

@TheerayutEncoder
I have separated the module for passing lot_producing_id of mrp_production_ids to the SVL when adding the landed cost for these MOs, as you proposed in this commit.
What do you think about it?
Additionally, I am not entirely sure of the purpose of this, since the remaining_qty of the SVL for landed costs is 0.0, and I believe these SVLs will not be considered when _run_fifo() is called, if I understand correctly. Is this intended for user experience, to see the related lot_ids in the SVL? Could you please explain the initial purpose?

AungKoKoLin1997 · 2024-08-27T10:25:04Z

What do you think of my idea of adding an option to choose a single or multiple lot/serial per SVL?

@matt454357 Please let me handle this part and include it in this PR because we urgently need this module, and I don't know when this PR will be merged.

matt454357 · 2024-08-27T23:09:49Z

@AungKoKoLin1997 any contribution you make is very much appreciated, Do it the way you feel is best, and I will work with it.

matt454357

Looks good to me

yostashiro · 2024-09-14T13:56:07Z

+        if (
+            not self.purchase_line_id
+            and self.product_id.cost_method == "fifo"
+            and len(self.lot_ids) == 1


Should we raise an error when len(self.lot_ids) > 1?

I think we could make it configurable if the community requires it. I don't have a strong need for that at the moment.

rousseldenis · 2024-09-20T06:46:02Z

/ocabot migration stock_valuation_fifo_lot

matt454357 · 2024-09-23T14:07:52Z

We will also need odoo/odoo#179447, in order to do revaluation (later).

kanda999

Functional review

yostashiro

Partial review on the revaluation feature.

yostashiro · 2025-04-23T03:50:30Z

+            all_candidates = self._sort_by_all_candidates(all_candidates, sort_by)
+        return all_candidates
+
+    # Depends on https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/180245


Let's remove this comment.

yostashiro

The module now handles revaluation for specific lots.

kanda999

Functional review: it works as expected

github-actions · 2026-02-15T13:07:13Z

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

…ility - Adapt Odoo's standard method _get_fifo_candidates. - Improve _get_price_unit to retrieve the value from the most recent incoming move line for the lot in No PO stock moves (e.g., customer returns) and make the logic configurable to also support Odoo’s standard behavior. - Add test cases - Enhances stock_valuation_layer handling for deliveries when products were received before this module was installed. Previously, missing lot_ids in older valuation records led to incorrect valuations. This update ensures accurate cost calculations during deliveries. Related Link: OCA#1350 (comment) - Add lot_ids in search view - Avoid completely overriding _run_fifo and use the standard behavior. - Add quantity and value-related fields in stock_move_line to cover all cases including multiple lots exist in an SVL record, and it is unclear which lot's remaining quantity is being delivered(Eg. Receive serials 001, 002 and 003 for an incoming move. Deliver 002, return 002 and deliver > - Add force_fifo_lot_id in stock_move_line to handle cases where a delivery needs to be made for an existing lot created before the installation of this module (e.g., lots 001 and 002 were received, lot 002 was delivered before the module's installation, and lot 001 is delivered after the module is installed). - Add a post_init_hook to update the lot_ids in SVL for existing records and to update the field values in existing stock_move_line records. - Remove stock_no_negative from dependency and check negative inventory is created when SVL is created for delivery. - Remove updating standard price

… stock_valuation_fifo_lot_mrp_landed_cost

AungKoKoLin1997 mentioned this pull request Aug 21, 2024

[16.0][ADD] stock_valuation_specific_identification OCA/stock-logistics-warehouse#2139

Closed

AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_valuation_fifo_lot branch 2 times, most recently from a3ece53 to 3c26a62 Compare August 21, 2024 04:48

AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_valuation_fifo_lot branch from b60bb4e to 71c8a67 Compare August 21, 2024 08:19

AungKoKoLin1997 marked this pull request as ready for review August 21, 2024 08:19

AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_valuation_fifo_lot branch from 71c8a67 to 07a5f63 Compare August 22, 2024 06:57

rousseldenis mentioned this pull request Aug 22, 2024

[16.0][MIG] stock_valuation_fifo_lot #1527

Closed

matt454357 reviewed Aug 22, 2024

View reviewed changes

AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_valuation_fifo_lot branch from 07a5f63 to 2a2dfb9 Compare August 23, 2024 08:58

AungKoKoLin1997 requested a review from matt454357 August 27, 2024 01:28

matt454357 approved these changes Sep 3, 2024

View reviewed changes

AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_valuation_fifo_lot branch from fbff13d to a7a187c Compare September 5, 2024 09:13

yostashiro reviewed Sep 14, 2024

View reviewed changes

OCA-git-bot added this to the 16.0 milestone Sep 20, 2024

OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Sep 20, 2024

Migration to version 16.0 #1101

Open

75 tasks

AungKoKoLin1997 mentioned this pull request Sep 24, 2024

[16.0][REF] stock_account: Add _get_qty_taken_on_candidate() odoo/odoo#180245

Closed

kanda999 approved these changes Apr 21, 2025

View reviewed changes

AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_valuation_fifo_lot branch from 3580456 to 8988b91 Compare April 21, 2025 10:16

yostashiro reviewed Apr 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

yostashiro suggested changes Apr 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

Comment thread stock_valuation_fifo_lot/wizard/stock_valuation_layer_revaluation.py Outdated

Comment thread stock_valuation_fifo_lot/wizard/stock_valuation_layer_revaluation.py Outdated

Comment thread stock_valuation_fifo_lot/wizard/stock_valuation_layer_revaluation.py Outdated

OCA-git-bot removed the approved label Apr 23, 2025

AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_valuation_fifo_lot branch from 629e739 to 19bd99b Compare April 24, 2025 07:22

AungKoKoLin1997 requested review from kanda999 and yostashiro April 24, 2025 07:22

AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_valuation_fifo_lot branch from 19bd99b to 2cc88f1 Compare April 24, 2025 08:23

yostashiro approved these changes May 28, 2025

View reviewed changes

OCA-git-bot added the approved label May 28, 2025

AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_valuation_fifo_lot branch from 25b2dd7 to 203e476 Compare July 9, 2025 09:50

kanda999 approved these changes Oct 6, 2025

View reviewed changes

yostashiro mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2025

[15.0][FIX] stock_valuation_fifo_lot: fix _get_price_unit() function and mrp dependence #2104

Open

github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Feb 15, 2026

ps-tubtim and others added 11 commits February 16, 2026 04:00

[15.0][ADD] stock_valuation_fifo_lot

ab9febf

[FIX] sorted by create_date when case no lot_ids or there is 1 date

6e5f11b

[FIX] error when not loop

7fc6882

[15.0][UPD] stock_valuation_fifo_lot

3d2bf32

[UPD] Update stock_valuation_fifo_lot.pot

ad4ef4c

[BOT] post-merge updates

ab3f1c0

[IMP] stock_valuation_fifo_lot: pre-commit stuff

7304ac9

[MIG] stock_valuation_fifo_lot: Migration to 16.0

ae9a14f

[REF] stock_valuation_fifo_lot: move landed cost to new bridge module…

e16e372

… stock_valuation_fifo_lot_mrp_landed_cost

[IMP] stock_valuation_fifo_lot: Allow revaluation for specific lot_id

1970f5d

AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_valuation_fifo_lot branch from 203e476 to 1970f5d Compare February 16, 2026 04:00

github-actions bot removed the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Feb 22, 2026

AungKoKoLin1997 mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2026

[16.0][MIG] stock_move_original_date: Migration to 16.0 #2262

Open

Uh oh!

Conversation

AungKoKoLin1997 commented Aug 20, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AungKoKoLin1997 commented Aug 21, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AungKoKoLin1997 commented Aug 21, 2024

Uh oh!

matt454357 commented Aug 21, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AungKoKoLin1997 commented Aug 22, 2024

Uh oh!

AungKoKoLin1997 commented Aug 22, 2024

Uh oh!

matt454357 commented Aug 22, 2024

Uh oh!

matt454357 commented Aug 22, 2024

Uh oh!

matt454357 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AungKoKoLin1997 commented Aug 23, 2024

Uh oh!

matt454357 commented Aug 23, 2024

Uh oh!

AungKoKoLin1997 commented Aug 23, 2024

Uh oh!

AungKoKoLin1997 commented Aug 27, 2024

Uh oh!

matt454357 commented Aug 27, 2024

Uh oh!

matt454357 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rousseldenis commented Sep 20, 2024

Uh oh!

matt454357 commented Sep 23, 2024

Uh oh!

kanda999 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

yostashiro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AungKoKoLin1997 commented Aug 20, 2024 •

edited

Loading

AungKoKoLin1997 commented Aug 21, 2024 •

edited

Loading

matt454357 commented Aug 21, 2024 •

edited

Loading