Skip to content

[16.0][IMP] stock_storage_type: Allow to recompute putaways + several improvements#1040

Open
rousseldenis wants to merge 7 commits intoOCA:16.0from
acsone:16.0-imp-allow-to-recompute-putaways-dro
Open

[16.0][IMP] stock_storage_type: Allow to recompute putaways + several improvements#1040
rousseldenis wants to merge 7 commits intoOCA:16.0from
acsone:16.0-imp-allow-to-recompute-putaways-dro

Conversation

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rousseldenis rousseldenis commented May 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Supersedes : #938 (rebased on new code)

Includes several improvements:

  • [IMP] stock_storage_type: Use of AND() instead of appending domains
  • [IMP] stock_storage_type: Rely on ORM in order to get locations
  • [IMP] stock_storage_type: Remove unused test file
  • [REF] stock_storage_type: Rely on stock_location_fill_state for empty state
  • [IMP] stock_storage_type: Ensure that a being emptied location can be filled in

@rousseldenis
[IMP] stock_storage_type: Allow to re-apply putaway rules on computed…
1c296af 
… location for a selected move line
@rousseldenis
[FIX] stock_storage_type: Allow to recompute putaways if location has…
c5a11dc 
… been populated

    In the case of no product mixing, if a destination location has already been computed and
    in the meantime, the location has been populated by another product, the computation
    still propose the same location.

    Exclude locations in that case.
@rousseldenis
[IMP] stock_storage_type: Use of AND() instead of appending domains
0ec6913
@rousseldenis
[IMP] stock_storage_type: Rely on ORM in order to get locations per q…
6bb91a5 
…uantity

    The current implementation was triggerring queries (read_group). Rely now
    on ORM to get records as 'quant_ids' field exists on locations
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OCA-git-bot commented May 22, 2025

Hi @jbaudoux,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@rousseldenis rousseldenis added enhancement New feature or request needs review labels May 22, 2025
@rousseldenis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

rousseldenis commented May 22, 2025

@jbaudoux

@rousseldenis rousseldenis added this to the 16.0 milestone May 22, 2025
@rousseldenis rousseldenis changed the title [16.0][IMP] stock_storage_type: Allow to recompute putaways [16.0][IMP] stock_storage_type: Allow to recompute putaways + several improvements May 22, 2025
@rousseldenis rousseldenis force-pushed the 16.0-imp-allow-to-recompute-putaways-dro branch from 0e0aa56 to 0d1b526 Compare May 22, 2025 13:34
@rousseldenis
[IMP] stock_storage_type: Ensure that a being emptied location can be…
24e2015 
… filled in

If every possible destination location (e.g.: for pickable stock) is filled in with
products, but with one outgoing move is in progress (picked but not yet validated),
the location should become available to store incoming products.

The putaway strategy should propose that location. So, add a condition to select 'empty' and
'being emptied' locations along with the 'location_will_contain_product/lot_ids' property to
avoid too much restriction
jbaudoux
jbaudoux approved these changes Jun 25, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jbaudoux jbaudoux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG

@jbaudoux
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jbaudoux commented Jun 25, 2025

FYI @sebalix

@jbaudoux
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jbaudoux commented Oct 14, 2025

/ocabot merge minor

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OCA-git-bot commented Oct 14, 2025

This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1040-by-jbaudoux-bump-minor, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2025
@OCA-git-bot
Merge PR #1040 into 16.0
eee5cdc 
Signed-off-by jbaudoux
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OCA-git-bot commented Oct 14, 2025

@jbaudoux your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1040-by-jbaudoux-bump-minor.

After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red.

@jbaudoux jbaudoux mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2025
Merged
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Feb 15, 2026

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Feb 15, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Mar 22, 2026
@rousseldenis rousseldenis reopened this Mar 24, 2026
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OCA-git-bot commented Mar 24, 2026

Hi @jbaudoux,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Mar 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jbaudoux jbaudoux jbaudoux approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

enhancement New feature or request needs review

Projects

None yet

Milestone

16.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@rousseldenis @OCA-git-bot @jbaudoux