-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
Add SPE1CASE2_SOURCE for testing SOURCE #1106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
totto82
wants to merge
3
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
addSourceTest
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,334 @@ | ||
-- This reservoir simulation deck is made available under the Open Database | ||
-- License: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/. Any rights in | ||
-- individual contents of the database are licensed under the Database Contents | ||
-- License: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/ | ||
|
||
-- Copyright (C) 2015 Statoil | ||
-- Copyright (C) 2023 Norce | ||
|
||
-- This simulation is based on the data given in | ||
-- 'Comparison of Solutions to a Three-Dimensional | ||
-- Black-Oil Reservoir Simulation Problem' by Aziz S. Odeh, | ||
-- Journal of Petroleum Technology, January 1981 | ||
-- Note: | ||
-- The wells are removed and instead a source term that is injecting gas is added -- | ||
-- The case does not mimic SPE1 anymore but acts as a test case for SOURCE -- | ||
|
||
|
||
RUNSPEC | ||
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
||
TITLE | ||
GAS SOURCE | ||
|
||
DIMENS | ||
10 10 3 / | ||
|
||
-- The number of equilibration regions is inferred from the EQLDIMS | ||
-- keyword. | ||
EQLDIMS | ||
/ | ||
|
||
-- The number of PVTW tables is inferred from the TABDIMS keyword; | ||
-- when no data is included in the keyword the default values are used. | ||
TABDIMS | ||
/ | ||
|
||
|
||
OIL | ||
GAS | ||
WATER | ||
DISGAS | ||
-- As seen from figure 4 in Odeh, GOR is increasing with time, | ||
-- which means that dissolved gas is present | ||
|
||
|
||
FIELD | ||
|
||
START | ||
1 'JAN' 2015 / | ||
|
||
WELLDIMS | ||
-- Item 1: maximum number of wells in the model | ||
-- - there are two wells in the problem; injector and producer | ||
-- Item 2: maximum number of grid blocks connected to any one well | ||
-- - must be one as the wells are located at specific grid blocks | ||
-- Item 3: maximum number of groups in the model | ||
-- - we are dealing with only one 'group' | ||
-- Item 4: maximum number of wells in any one group | ||
-- - there must be two wells in a group as there are two wells in total | ||
2 1 1 2 / | ||
|
||
UNIFIN | ||
UNIFOUT | ||
|
||
GRID | ||
|
||
-- The INIT keyword is used to request an .INIT file. The .INIT file | ||
-- is written before the simulation actually starts, and contains grid | ||
-- properties and saturation tables as inferred from the input | ||
-- deck. There are no other keywords which can be used to configure | ||
-- exactly what is written to the .INIT file. | ||
INIT | ||
|
||
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
NOECHO | ||
|
||
DX | ||
-- There are in total 300 cells with length 1000ft in x-direction | ||
300*1000 / | ||
DY | ||
-- There are in total 300 cells with length 1000ft in y-direction | ||
300*1000 / | ||
DZ | ||
-- The layers are 20, 30 and 50 ft thick, in each layer there are 100 cells | ||
100*20 100*30 100*50 / | ||
|
||
TOPS | ||
-- The depth of the top of each grid block | ||
100*8325 / | ||
|
||
PORO | ||
-- Constant porosity of 0.3 throughout all 300 grid cells | ||
300*0.3 / | ||
|
||
PERMX | ||
-- The layers have perm. 500mD, 50mD and 200mD, respectively. | ||
100*500 100*50 100*200 / | ||
|
||
PERMY | ||
-- Equal to PERMX | ||
100*500 100*50 100*200 / | ||
|
||
PERMZ | ||
-- Cannot find perm. in z-direction in Odeh's paper | ||
-- For the time being, we will assume PERMZ equal to PERMX and PERMY: | ||
100*500 100*50 100*200 / | ||
ECHO | ||
|
||
PROPS | ||
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
||
PVTW | ||
-- Item 1: pressure reference (psia) | ||
-- Item 2: water FVF (rb per bbl or rb per stb) | ||
-- Item 3: water compressibility (psi^{-1}) | ||
-- Item 4: water viscosity (cp) | ||
-- Item 5: water 'viscosibility' (psi^{-1}) | ||
|
||
-- Using values from Norne: | ||
-- In METRIC units: | ||
-- 277.0 1.038 4.67E-5 0.318 0.0 / | ||
-- In FIELD units: | ||
4017.55 1.038 3.22E-6 0.318 0.0 / | ||
|
||
ROCK | ||
-- Item 1: reference pressure (psia) | ||
-- Item 2: rock compressibility (psi^{-1}) | ||
|
||
-- Using values from table 1 in Odeh: | ||
14.7 3E-6 / | ||
|
||
SWOF | ||
-- Column 1: water saturation | ||
-- - this has been set to (almost) equally spaced values from 0.12 to 1 | ||
-- Column 2: water relative permeability | ||
-- - generated from the Corey-type approx. formula | ||
-- the coeffisient is set to 10e-5, S_{orw}=0 and S_{wi}=0.12 | ||
-- Column 3: oil relative permeability when only oil and water are present | ||
-- - we will use the same values as in column 3 in SGOF. | ||
-- This is not really correct, but since only the first | ||
-- two values are of importance, this does not really matter | ||
-- Column 4: corresponding water-oil capillary pressure (psi) | ||
|
||
0.12 0 1 0 | ||
0.18 4.64876033057851E-008 1 0 | ||
0.24 0.000000186 0.997 0 | ||
0.3 4.18388429752066E-007 0.98 0 | ||
0.36 7.43801652892562E-007 0.7 0 | ||
0.42 1.16219008264463E-006 0.35 0 | ||
0.48 1.67355371900826E-006 0.2 0 | ||
0.54 2.27789256198347E-006 0.09 0 | ||
0.6 2.97520661157025E-006 0.021 0 | ||
0.66 3.7654958677686E-006 0.01 0 | ||
0.72 4.64876033057851E-006 0.001 0 | ||
0.78 0.000005625 0.0001 0 | ||
0.84 6.69421487603306E-006 0 0 | ||
0.91 8.05914256198347E-006 0 0 | ||
1 0.00001 0 0 / | ||
|
||
|
||
SGOF | ||
-- Column 1: gas saturation | ||
-- Column 2: gas relative permeability | ||
-- Column 3: oil relative permeability when oil, gas and connate water are present | ||
-- Column 4: oil-gas capillary pressure (psi) | ||
-- - stated to be zero in Odeh's paper | ||
|
||
-- Values in column 1-3 are taken from table 3 in Odeh's paper: | ||
0 0 1 0 | ||
0.001 0 1 0 | ||
0.02 0 0.997 0 | ||
0.05 0.005 0.980 0 | ||
0.12 0.025 0.700 0 | ||
0.2 0.075 0.350 0 | ||
0.25 0.125 0.200 0 | ||
0.3 0.190 0.090 0 | ||
0.4 0.410 0.021 0 | ||
0.45 0.60 0.010 0 | ||
0.5 0.72 0.001 0 | ||
0.6 0.87 0.0001 0 | ||
0.7 0.94 0.000 0 | ||
0.85 0.98 0.000 0 | ||
0.88 0.984 0.000 0 / | ||
--1.00 1.0 0.000 0 / | ||
-- Warning from Eclipse: first sat. value in SWOF + last sat. value in SGOF | ||
-- must not be greater than 1, but Eclipse still runs | ||
-- Flow needs the sum to be excactly 1 so I added a row with gas sat. = 0.88 | ||
-- The corresponding krg value was estimated by assuming linear rel. between | ||
-- gas sat. and krw. between gas sat. 0.85 and 1.00 (the last two values given) | ||
|
||
DENSITY | ||
-- Density (lb per ft³) at surface cond. of | ||
-- oil, water and gas, respectively (in that order) | ||
|
||
-- Using values from Norne: | ||
-- In METRIC units: | ||
-- 859.5 1033.0 0.854 / | ||
-- In FIELD units: | ||
53.66 64.49 0.0533 / | ||
|
||
PVDG | ||
-- Column 1: gas phase pressure (psia) | ||
-- Column 2: gas formation volume factor (rb per Mscf) | ||
-- - in Odeh's paper the units are said to be given in rb per bbl, | ||
-- but this is assumed to be a mistake: FVF-values in Odeh's paper | ||
-- are given in rb per scf, not rb per bbl. This will be in | ||
-- agreement with conventions | ||
-- Column 3: gas viscosity (cP) | ||
|
||
-- Using values from lower right table in Odeh's table 2: | ||
14.700 166.666 0.008000 | ||
264.70 12.0930 0.009600 | ||
514.70 6.27400 0.011200 | ||
1014.7 3.19700 0.014000 | ||
2014.7 1.61400 0.018900 | ||
2514.7 1.29400 0.020800 | ||
3014.7 1.08000 0.022800 | ||
4014.7 0.81100 0.026800 | ||
5014.7 0.64900 0.030900 | ||
9014.7 0.38600 0.047000 / | ||
|
||
PVTO | ||
-- Column 1: dissolved gas-oil ratio (Mscf per stb) | ||
-- Column 2: bubble point pressure (psia) | ||
-- Column 3: oil FVF for saturated oil (rb per stb) | ||
-- Column 4: oil viscosity for saturated oil (cP) | ||
|
||
-- Use values from top left table in Odeh's table 2: | ||
0.0010 14.7 1.0620 1.0400 / | ||
0.0905 264.7 1.1500 0.9750 / | ||
0.1800 514.7 1.2070 0.9100 / | ||
0.3710 1014.7 1.2950 0.8300 / | ||
0.6360 2014.7 1.4350 0.6950 / | ||
0.7750 2514.7 1.5000 0.6410 / | ||
0.9300 3014.7 1.5650 0.5940 / | ||
1.2700 4014.7 1.6950 0.5100 | ||
9014.7 1.5790 0.7400 / | ||
1.6180 5014.7 1.8270 0.4490 | ||
9014.7 1.7370 0.6310 / | ||
-- It is required to enter data for undersaturated oil for the highest GOR | ||
-- (i.e. the last row) in the PVTO table. | ||
-- In order to fulfill this requirement, values for oil FVF and viscosity | ||
-- at 9014.7psia and GOR=1.618 for undersaturated oil have been approximated: | ||
-- It has been assumed that there is a linear relation between the GOR | ||
-- and the FVF when keeping the pressure constant at 9014.7psia. | ||
-- From Odeh we know that (at 9014.7psia) the FVF is 2.357 at GOR=2.984 | ||
-- for saturated oil and that the FVF is 1.579 at GOR=1.27 for undersaturated oil, | ||
-- so it is possible to use the assumption described above. | ||
-- An equivalent approximation for the viscosity has been used. | ||
/ | ||
|
||
SOLUTION | ||
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
||
EQUIL | ||
-- Item 1: datum depth (ft) | ||
-- Item 2: pressure at datum depth (psia) | ||
-- - Odeh's table 1 says that initial reservoir pressure is | ||
-- 4800 psi at 8400ft, which explains choice of item 1 and 2 | ||
-- Item 3: depth of water-oil contact (ft) | ||
-- - chosen to be directly under the reservoir | ||
-- Item 4: oil-water capillary pressure at the water oil contact (psi) | ||
-- - given to be 0 in Odeh's paper | ||
-- Item 5: depth of gas-oil contact (ft) | ||
-- - chosen to be directly above the reservoir | ||
-- Item 6: gas-oil capillary pressure at gas-oil contact (psi) | ||
-- - given to be 0 in Odeh's paper | ||
-- Item 7: RSVD-table | ||
-- Item 8: RVVD-table | ||
-- Item 9: Set to 0 as this is the only value supported by OPM | ||
|
||
-- Item #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | ||
8400 4800 8450 0 8300 0 1 0 0 / | ||
|
||
RSVD | ||
-- Dissolved GOR is initially constant with depth through the reservoir. | ||
-- The reason is that the initial reservoir pressure given is higher | ||
---than the bubble point presssure of 4014.7psia, meaning that there is no | ||
-- free gas initially present. | ||
8300 1.270 | ||
8450 1.270 / | ||
|
||
SUMMARY | ||
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
||
-- Pressures of the cell where the injector and producer are located | ||
BPR | ||
1 1 1 / | ||
10 10 3 / | ||
/ | ||
|
||
-- Gas saturation at grid points given in Odeh's paper | ||
BGSAT | ||
1 1 1 / | ||
1 1 2 / | ||
1 1 3 / | ||
10 1 1 / | ||
10 1 2 / | ||
10 1 3 / | ||
10 10 1 / | ||
10 10 2 / | ||
10 10 3 / | ||
/ | ||
|
||
SCHEDULE | ||
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
RPTSCHED | ||
'PRES' 'SGAS' 'RS' 'WELLS' / | ||
|
||
RPTRST | ||
'BASIC=1' / | ||
|
||
|
||
-- If no resolution (i.e. case 1), the two following lines must be added: | ||
--DRSDT | ||
-- 0 / | ||
-- Since this is Case 2, the two lines above have been commented out. | ||
-- if DRSDT is set to 0, GOR cannot rise and free gas does not | ||
-- dissolve in undersaturated oil -> constant bubble point pressure | ||
|
||
-- Add a source term that injects GAS [kg] in cell I=1 J=1 K=1 | ||
SOURCE | ||
1 1 1 GAS 25000 / | ||
/ | ||
|
||
TSTEP | ||
--Advance the simulater once a month for FIVE years: | ||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 | ||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 | ||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 | ||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 | ||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 / | ||
|
||
END |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no corresponding sink term, I think that should be added to be similar to the regular SPE1. Also, how does the phase specification work for the sink term?