Skip to content

C03 Fixes and Reduction#707

Open
DotDotSlashRepo wants to merge 2 commits intoOWASP:mainfrom
DotDotSlashRepo:C03-Edits-Reduction
Open

C03 Fixes and Reduction#707
DotDotSlashRepo wants to merge 2 commits intoOWASP:mainfrom
DotDotSlashRepo:C03-Edits-Reduction

Conversation

@DotDotSlashRepo
Copy link
Copy Markdown

  • Formatting edits on introduction paragraph
  • Merged 3.2.2 to 3.2.1 because of similarity
  • Made edits to improve grammar of 3.2.6
  • Added reference link to OWASP AITG

* Formatting edits on introduction paragraph.
* Merged 3.2.2 to 3.2.1 because of similarity
* made edits to improve grammar of 3.2.6
* added reference link to OWASP AITG
@RicoKomenda RicoKomenda requested a review from ottosulin April 19, 2026 19:09
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@RicoKomenda RicoKomenda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fixes. A few things to note before this can merge.

The merge of 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 should be reverted. PR #680 (already merged) deliberately split the old compound control into two separate L1 requirements because input validation testing and output sanitization testing are independently verifiable. A system could pass one and fail the other. Re-merging them undoes that intentional split and reintroduces a compound control. Please keep 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 as separate controls and restore the original numbering through 3.2.7.

Appendix D would also need to be updated if the renumbering stands, which is another reason to avoid it.

The other changes are all good and should be kept: the em-dash removal in the control objective, the grammar fix on 3.2.6 ("is provided" added), and the OWASP AI Testing Guide reference.

@RicoKomenda
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hi @DotDotSlashRepo: Can you change the proposed fixes from earlier?

Revert merge of 3.2.1 and 3.2.2
@DotDotSlashRepo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Done changes as per comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants