Implement fuzztesting. #1139
Implement fuzztesting. #1139
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings. WalkthroughAdds fuzz testing infra: Hypothesis dev dependency and Slack property tests, Dockerfile/entrypoint and compose service for GraphQL fuzzing, CI job and Makefile target to run fuzz tests, E2E permission bypasses, and a cspell dictionary addition. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (2)
143-149: Consider adding assumptions to narrow down test inputs.The current strategies generate completely random text for
index_nameandquery, which might lead to many test failures for invalid inputs. Since we're testing that the function handles inputs properly (not crashes), we could add assumptions to focus on more realistic inputs.Consider adding assumptions or using more specific strategies:
@hypothesis.given( - index_name=hypothesis.strategies.text(), + index_name=hypothesis.strategies.sampled_from(["projects", "chapters", "users", "committees", "issues"]), query=hypothesis.strategies.text(), page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1), hits_per_page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=hypothesis.strategies.lists(hypothesis.strategies.text()), ) + @hypothesis.assume(hypothesis.strategies.text(min_size=1)) def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters):This would focus testing on valid index names from the existing test cases while still testing random values for other parameters.
143-166: Add mocking for get_search_results to isolate the test.The current test calls the actual
algolia_searchfunction without mocking its dependencies, which makes it an integration test rather than a unit test. For a proper unit test, we should mock theget_search_resultsfunction.Add mocking to isolate the test:
@hypothesis.given( index_name=hypothesis.strategies.text(), query=hypothesis.strategies.text(), page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1), hits_per_page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=hypothesis.strategies.lists(hypothesis.strategies.text()), ) def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" + with patch( + "apps.core.api.algolia.get_search_results", return_value=MOCKED_SEARCH_RESULTS + ): mock_request = Mock() mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} mock_request.method = "POST" mock_request.body = json.dumps( { "facetFilters": facet_filters, "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, "indexName": index_name, "page": page, "query": query, } ) response = algolia_search(mock_request) assert response.status_code != requests.codes.server_errorThis would test only the
algolia_searchfunction's input validation and error handling, not the actual search functionality.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
backend/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
backend/pyproject.toml(1 hunks)backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
backend/apps/core/api/algolia.py (1) (1)
algolia_search(44-90)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run CI/CD
backend/pyproject.toml
[warning] 1-1: The top-level linter settings are deprecated in favour of their counterparts in the lint section. Please update the following options in backend/pyproject.toml: - 'per-file-ignores' -> 'lint.per-file-ignores'
[warning] 1-1: one-blank-line-before-class (D203) and no-blank-line-before-class (D211) are incompatible. Ignoring one-blank-line-before-class.
[warning] 1-1: multi-line-summary-first-line (D212) and multi-line-summary-second-line (D213) are incompatible. Ignoring multi-line-summary-second-line.
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py
[error] 1-1: Ruff: Found 1 error (1 fixed, 0 remaining).
🔇 Additional comments (2)
backend/pyproject.toml (1)
53-53: Good addition of hypothesis for fuzz testing.Adding the Hypothesis library as a development dependency is appropriate for implementing fuzz testing. The version constraint (
^6.129.4) follows the project's versioning pattern.backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
6-6: Appropriate import for the hypothesis library.This import is necessary for the fuzz testing implementation below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (3)
143-167: Consider additional strategies for more comprehensive testingWhile the current implementation is solid, you might consider enhancing it with additional strategies to test more edge cases:
- Test with empty strings and very long strings
- Test with special characters that might cause issues in JSON processing
- Consider adding a separate test case for malformed JSON
Here's how you could enhance the test:
@hypothesis.given( index_name=hypothesis.strategies.text(), query=hypothesis.strategies.text(), page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1), hits_per_page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=hypothesis.strategies.lists(hypothesis.strategies.text()), ) def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" mock_request = Mock() mock_request.method = "POST" mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} mock_request.body = json.dumps( { "facetFilters": facet_filters, "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, "indexName": index_name, "page": page, "query": query, } ) response = algolia_search(mock_request) assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] + + @hypothesis.given( + malformed_json=hypothesis.strategies.text(), + ) + def test_fuzz_algolia_search_malformed_json(self, malformed_json): + """Test the algolia_search function with malformed JSON.""" + mock_request = Mock() + mock_request.method = "POST" + mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} + mock_request.body = malformed_json + + response = algolia_search(mock_request) + + # Even with malformed JSON, we should never see a server error + assert response.status_code != requests.codes.server_error
143-167: Consider adding explicit patching of external dependenciesThe current test might make actual API calls if the validation passes. Consider patching external dependencies to ensure the test remains isolated and fast.
Here's how you could modify the test:
@hypothesis.given( index_name=hypothesis.strategies.text(), query=hypothesis.strategies.text(), page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1), hits_per_page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=hypothesis.strategies.lists(hypothesis.strategies.text()), ) def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" + with patch("apps.core.api.algolia.get_search_results", return_value=MOCKED_SEARCH_RESULTS): mock_request = Mock() mock_request.method = "POST" mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} mock_request.body = json.dumps( { "facetFilters": facet_filters, "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, "indexName": index_name, "page": page, "query": query, } ) response = algolia_search(mock_request) assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request]
143-167: Consider adding documentation about fuzz testingTo help other developers understand the purpose and benefits of fuzz testing, consider adding more detailed documentation in the test docstring.
@hypothesis.given( index_name=hypothesis.strategies.text(), query=hypothesis.strategies.text(), page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1), hits_per_page=hypothesis.strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=hypothesis.strategies.lists(hypothesis.strategies.text()), ) def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): - """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" + """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing. + + This test uses the Hypothesis library to generate random inputs for the algolia_search + function. It verifies that the function does not return a server error (500) regardless + of the input provided. For valid inputs, it should return 200 OK, and for invalid inputs, + it should return 400 Bad Request. + + The test generates: + - Random text for index_name and query + - Positive integers for page + - Integers between 1 and 1000 for hits_per_page + - Lists of text strings for facet_filters + """
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
backend/apps/core/api/algolia.py (1) (1)
algolia_search(44-90)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: CodeQL (python)
- GitHub Check: CodeQL (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Run backend tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
🔇 Additional comments (5)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (5)
4-4: Import for hypothesis added correctlyGood job importing the
hypothesislibrary for fuzz testing. This is a powerful tool for property-based testing that can help identify edge cases and improve robustness.
143-149: Good use of hypothesis strategiesThe strategies chosen for each parameter are appropriate:
- Text strategies for
index_name,query, and items infacet_filters- Integer strategy with sensible constraints for
page(min_value=1)- Integer strategy with appropriate bounds for
hits_per_page(1-1000)- List strategy for
facet_filtersThese cover a broad range of inputs that could potentially trigger edge cases.
150-154: Correctly implemented mock request with IP addressGreat job including the
HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FORheader with the client IP address. This addresses a previous review comment and ensures that the test properly handles the case whenindex_nameis "chapters", which requires the IP address for the cache key.
155-163: Well-structured JSON for the request bodyThe request body is correctly structured with all the parameters needed for the Algolia search function. Using
json.dumps()ensures proper JSON formatting.
165-167: Improved assertion for response status codeThe assertion has been improved to check that the response status code is either
requests.codes.ok(200) orrequests.codes.bad_request(400), addressing the previous review comment. This ensures that the function handles both valid and invalid inputs correctly without returning a server error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
143-167: Good implementation of fuzz testing for algolia_search, but consider adding constraints to strategiesThe fuzz testing implementation looks good and addresses the previous review comments with the addition of the IP address and proper assertions. However, the strategies for
pageandhits_per_pagedon't have any constraints, which might generate values that will always fail validation.Consider updating the strategies to match the validation constraints in the production code:
@given( index_name=strategies.text(), query=strategies.text(), - page=strategies.integers(), + page=strategies.integers(min_value=1), - hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), + hits_per_page=strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), )This will make the test more focused on finding edge cases within valid input ranges rather than testing inputs that would be rejected by validation.
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1)
1-41: Fix linting issues with whitespace and newlineThe file has several whitespace issues flagged by the static analysis tool.
Remove trailing whitespace from blank lines and add a newline at the end of the file:
# Remove whitespace from blank lines on lines 24, 26, 28, 37, 39, 41 # Add newline at the end of the file🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1)
1-39: Fix whitespace issues in blank linesThere are whitespace issues in blank lines that should be fixed.
Remove trailing whitespace from blank lines 34 and 37 as flagged by the static analysis tool.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py(2 hunks)backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (2)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
backend/apps/core/api/algolia.py (1) (1)
algolia_search(44-90)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1) (1)
test_handler_responses(32-40)
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1)
1-41:✅ Verification successful
Directory name has a typo
The path
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channelcontains a typo injoindwhich should bejoined.Consider renaming this directory to fix the typo and ensure path consistency with the rest of the codebase.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the correct directory exists fd "user_joined_channel" --type d # Check if the typo exists elsewhere in the codebase fd "user_joind_channel" --type dLength of output: 172
Directory Name Typo Resolved
The directory in question is now correctly named. The previous typo (
user_joind_channel) has been fixed touser_joined_channelin thefuzz_testsdirectory.
- The file path now reads:
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joined_channel/gsoc_test.py🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
| @given( | ||
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | ||
| ) | ||
| def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled): | ||
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | ||
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID} | ||
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | ||
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | ||
|
|
||
| gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | ||
|
|
||
| assert True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Strengthen handler_responses test with mock verifications
The current test executes the handler but doesn't verify that it behaves correctly based on the events_enabled value.
Update the test to verify the expected behavior:
@given(
events_enabled=st.booleans(),
)
def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled):
settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled
mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID}
mock_slack_client = MagicMock()
mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}}
gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock())
- assert True
+ # Verify that the Slack client was used appropriately based on events_enabled
+ if events_enabled:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user="U123456")
+ mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_called()
+ else:
+ # If events are disabled, no Slack client operations should be performed
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called()
+ mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_not_called()📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @given( | |
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | |
| ) | |
| def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled): | |
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | |
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID} | |
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | |
| gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | |
| assert True | |
| @given( | |
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | |
| ) | |
| def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled): | |
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | |
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID} | |
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | |
| gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | |
| # Verify that the Slack client was used appropriately based on events_enabled | |
| if events_enabled: | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user="U123456") | |
| mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_called() | |
| else: | |
| # If events are disabled, no Slack client operations should be performed | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called() | |
| mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_not_called() |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| @given( | ||
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | ||
| project_count=st.integers(), | ||
| issue_count=st.integers(), | ||
| ) | ||
| @patch("apps.owasp.models.project.Project.active_projects_count") | ||
| @patch("apps.github.models.issue.Issue.open_issues_count") | ||
| def test_handler_responses( | ||
| self, | ||
| mock_open_issues_count, | ||
| mock_active_projects_count, | ||
| events_enabled, | ||
| project_count, | ||
| issue_count, | ||
| ): | ||
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | ||
| mock_active_projects_count.return_value = project_count | ||
| mock_open_issues_count.return_value = issue_count | ||
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID} | ||
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | ||
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | ||
|
|
||
| assert True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add constraints to fuzz test parameters and strengthen assertions
The current test doesn't place constraints on generated integers and uses a trivial assertion.
Update the test with improved constraints and assertions:
@given(
events_enabled=st.booleans(),
- project_count=st.integers(),
- issue_count=st.integers(),
+ project_count=st.integers(min_value=0),
+ issue_count=st.integers(min_value=0),
)
@patch("apps.owasp.models.project.Project.active_projects_count")
@patch("apps.github.models.issue.Issue.open_issues_count")
def test_handler_responses(
self,
mock_open_issues_count,
mock_active_projects_count,
events_enabled,
project_count,
issue_count,
):
settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled
mock_active_projects_count.return_value = project_count
mock_open_issues_count.return_value = issue_count
mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID}
mock_slack_client = MagicMock()
mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}}
contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock())
- assert True
+ # Verify the behavior based on whether events are enabled
+ if events_enabled:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user="U123456")
+ mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_called()
+ # You could also verify that the message contains the project_count and issue_count
+ else:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called()
+ mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_not_called()Using non-negative integers for counts makes the test more realistic, as negative counts wouldn't make sense in this context.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @given( | |
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | |
| project_count=st.integers(), | |
| issue_count=st.integers(), | |
| ) | |
| @patch("apps.owasp.models.project.Project.active_projects_count") | |
| @patch("apps.github.models.issue.Issue.open_issues_count") | |
| def test_handler_responses( | |
| self, | |
| mock_open_issues_count, | |
| mock_active_projects_count, | |
| events_enabled, | |
| project_count, | |
| issue_count, | |
| ): | |
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | |
| mock_active_projects_count.return_value = project_count | |
| mock_open_issues_count.return_value = issue_count | |
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID} | |
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | |
| contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | |
| assert True | |
| @given( | |
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | |
| project_count=st.integers(min_value=0), | |
| issue_count=st.integers(min_value=0), | |
| ) | |
| @patch("apps.owasp.models.project.Project.active_projects_count") | |
| @patch("apps.github.models.issue.Issue.open_issues_count") | |
| def test_handler_responses( | |
| self, | |
| mock_open_issues_count, | |
| mock_active_projects_count, | |
| events_enabled, | |
| project_count, | |
| issue_count, | |
| ): | |
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | |
| mock_active_projects_count.return_value = project_count | |
| mock_open_issues_count.return_value = issue_count | |
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID} | |
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | |
| contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | |
| # Verify the behavior based on whether events are enabled | |
| if events_enabled: | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user="U123456") | |
| mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_called() | |
| # You could also verify that the message contains the project_count and issue_count | |
| else: | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called() | |
| mock_slack_client.chat_postMessage.assert_not_called() |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
143-149: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionSpecify appropriate boundaries for integer strategies
The
pageandhits_per_pagestrategies should have appropriate bounds to align with real-world constraints and avoid generating invalid inputs that would make the test unreliable.@given( index_name=strategies.text(), query=strategies.text(), - page=strategies.integers(), - hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), + page=strategies.integers(min_value=1), + hits_per_page=strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), )
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
150-167: The fuzz test implementation is good, but could benefit from a small enhancementGreat job implementing this fuzz test! The inclusion of the IP address and assertion for both success and bad request codes matches the expected behavior of the
algolia_searchfunction.Consider adding an additional test that specifically tests malformed JSON handling:
@given(invalid_json=strategies.text()) def test_fuzz_algolia_search_malformed_json(self, invalid_json): """Test the algolia_search function with malformed JSON.""" mock_request = Mock() mock_request.method = "POST" mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} mock_request.body = invalid_json response = algolia_search(mock_request) assert response.status_code == requests.codes.server_error
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py(2 hunks)backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (3)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1) (1)
test_handler_responses(20-38)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1) (1)
test_handler_responses(32-40)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
backend/apps/core/api/algolia.py (1) (1)
algolia_search(44-90)
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1)
13-38:❓ Verification inconclusive
Add meaningful assertions to validate the contribute handler behavior
The current test with
assert Trueonly verifies the code doesn't throw an exception, but doesn't validate thatcontribute_handleractually performs the expected actions based on the input parameters.def test_handler_responses( self, mock_open_issues_count, mock_active_projects_count, events_enabled, project_count, issue_count, ): settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled mock_active_projects_count.return_value = project_count mock_open_issues_count.return_value = issue_count mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID} mock_slack_client = MagicMock() mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) - assert True + # When events are enabled, the client should attempt to open a conversation + if events_enabled: + mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user=mock_slack_event["user"]) + + # Verify the correct count values were accessed + mock_active_projects_count.assert_called_once() + mock_open_issues_count.assert_called_once() + else: + # When events are disabled, no client interaction should occur + mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called()Additionally, fix the formatting issues highlighted by the static analyzer:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Replace trailing whitespace sed -i 's/[[:space:]]*$//' backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.pyLength of output: 104
Test Enhancements & Formatting Fixes: Please Verify
- The trailing whitespace issues in
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.pyhave been cleaned up.- The test should now include meaningful assertions to verify that the
contribute_handlerbehaves as expected:
- When
settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLEDis true, the Slack client’sconversations_openmust be called with the correct user and bothactive_projects_countandopen_issues_countshould be accessed exactly once.- When
settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLEDis false, no call toconversations_openshould occur.- Please confirm that the following diff (replacing
assert True) has been incorporated into the test:def test_handler_responses( self, mock_open_issues_count, mock_active_projects_count, events_enabled, project_count, issue_count, ): settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled mock_active_projects_count.return_value = project_count mock_open_issues_count.return_value = issue_count mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_CONTRIBUTE_CHANNEL_ID} mock_slack_client = MagicMock() mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) - assert True + if events_enabled: + mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user=mock_slack_event["user"]) + mock_active_projects_count.assert_called_once() + mock_open_issues_count.assert_called_once() + else: + mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called()Action: Please verify manually that the meaningful assertions have been applied alongside the formatting fixes to confidently validate the handler’s behavior.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| @given( | ||
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | ||
| ) | ||
| def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled): | ||
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | ||
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID} | ||
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | ||
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | ||
|
|
||
| gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | ||
|
|
||
| assert True | ||
|
No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify handler behavior with concrete assertions
Similar to the previous test method, this test only checks that the code runs without exceptions, but doesn't validate that the handler behaves as expected when events are enabled or disabled.
def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled):
settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled
mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID}
mock_slack_client = MagicMock()
mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}}
gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock())
- assert True
+ # When events are enabled, the client should attempt to open a conversation
+ if events_enabled:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user=mock_slack_event["user"])
+ else:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called()Additionally, fix the formatting issues highlighted by the static analyzer:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Replace trailing whitespace and ensure a newline at end of file
sed -i 's/[[:space:]]*$//' backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
echo '' >> backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.pyLength of output: 108
Action Required: Add concrete assertions for Slack handler behavior
The current test in
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
merely ensures that no exceptions occur instead of validating the actual behavior. Please update the test as follows:
- When events are enabled: Assert that
mock_slack_client.conversations_openis called once with the properuserattribute frommock_slack_event. - When events are disabled: Assert that
mock_slack_client.conversations_openis never called.
For example, consider replacing:
gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock())
- assert True
+ if events_enabled:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user=mock_slack_event["user"])
+ else:
+ mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called()Additionally, the formatting issues reported (trailing whitespace removal and ensuring a trailing newline) have been addressed by the static analyzer script. Please verify manually that these formatting fixes have been applied correctly to the file.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @given( | |
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | |
| ) | |
| def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled): | |
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | |
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID} | |
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | |
| gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | |
| assert True | |
| @given( | |
| events_enabled=st.booleans(), | |
| ) | |
| def test_handler_responses(self, events_enabled): | |
| settings.SLACK_EVENTS_ENABLED = events_enabled | |
| mock_slack_event = {"user": "U123456", "channel": OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID} | |
| mock_slack_client = MagicMock() | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} | |
| gsoc_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) | |
| # When events are enabled, the client should attempt to open a conversation | |
| if events_enabled: | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_called_once_with(user=mock_slack_event["user"]) | |
| else: | |
| mock_slack_client.conversations_open.assert_not_called() |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py (1)
167-167: Add more specific assertions for different input scenarios.The current assertion only checks that the response status code is either OK or BAD_REQUEST, which verifies the handler doesn't crash. However, it would be more valuable to verify specific behavior based on input patterns.
- assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] + # For valid inputs (positive page and reasonable hits_per_page), expect successful response + if page > 0 and 1 <= hits_per_page <= 1000: + # Some inputs might still be invalid based on other validations + assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] + else: + # For invalid inputs, expect bad request + assert response.status_code == requests.codes.bad_request + + # Ensure we never get server errors + assert response.status_code != requests.codes.server_errorbackend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (3)
1-39: Directory name contains a typo.The directory name
user_joind_channelcontains a typo and should beuser_joined_channelto maintain consistency with the actual event name.The file is in a directory with a typo:
user_joind_channelshould beuser_joined_channel.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
34-37: Fix whitespace in blank lines.There are blank lines containing whitespace, which should be removed for consistency.
mock_slack_client = MagicMock() mock_slack_client.conversations_open.return_value = {"channel": {"id": "C123456"}} - + contribute_handler(event=mock_slack_event, client=mock_slack_client, ack=MagicMock()) - +🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
13-17: Add constraints to integer strategies.The current implementation uses unconstrained integers for project and issue counts, which could lead to unrealistic test scenarios and potential overflow issues.
@given( events_enabled=st.booleans(), - project_count=st.integers(), - issue_count=st.integers(), + project_count=st.integers(min_value=0, max_value=10000), + issue_count=st.integers(min_value=0, max_value=10000), )This change provides more realistic bounds for these values while still testing a wide range of scenarios.
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (3)
1-41: Directory name contains a typo.The directory name
user_joind_channelcontains a typo and should beuser_joined_channelto maintain consistency with the actual event name.The file is in a directory with a typo:
user_joind_channelshould beuser_joined_channel.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
41-41: Add newline at end of file.The file is missing a newline at the end, which is a common convention for source files.
Add a newline at the end of the file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
24-40: Fix whitespace in blank lines.There are multiple blank lines containing whitespace throughout the file, which should be removed for consistency.
Remove whitespace from all blank lines in the file (lines 24, 26, 28, 37, 39, and 41).
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
backend/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
backend/pyproject.toml(1 hunks)backend/tests/core/api/algolia_test.py(2 hunks)backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py(1 hunks)backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/pyproject.toml
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (2)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1) (1)
test_handler_responses(20-38)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py (1)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py (1) (1)
test_handler_responses(32-40)
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
28-28: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
39-39: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
41-41: No newline at end of file
Add trailing newline
(W292)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py
34-34: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
37-37: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
| query=strategies.text(), | ||
| page=strategies.integers(), | ||
| hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), | ||
| facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Constrain strategy value ranges for page and hits_per_page.
Currently, the page and hits_per_page strategies allow any integer value, including negatives and zero, which are likely invalid inputs in the production code. The existing unit tests in this file (lines 107-110) show that validation is needed for these parameters.
- page=strategies.integers(),
- hits_per_page=strategies.integers(),
+ page=strategies.integers(min_value=1),
+ hits_per_page=strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000),This change aligns with the validation being performed in the implementation and matches the constraints in the parametrized tests above.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| query=strategies.text(), | |
| page=strategies.integers(), | |
| hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), | |
| facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), | |
| query=strategies.text(), | |
| page=strategies.integers(min_value=1), | |
| hits_per_page=strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), | |
| facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), |
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/contribute_test.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| def test_check_gsoc_handler(self, channel_id): | ||
| gsoc_module = __import__( | ||
| "apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc", | ||
| fromlist=["gsoc_handler"], | ||
| ) | ||
| check_gsoc_handler = getattr( | ||
| gsoc_module, | ||
| "check_gsoc_handler", | ||
| lambda x: x.get("channel") == OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID, | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| check_gsoc_handler({"channel": channel_id}) | ||
|
|
||
| assert True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the dynamic import approach in test_check_gsoc_handler.
The current implementation uses a complex dynamic import approach with a fallback lambda. This makes the test harder to understand and may hide issues with the actual check_gsoc_handler function.
- def test_check_gsoc_handler(self, channel_id):
- gsoc_module = __import__(
- "apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc",
- fromlist=["gsoc_handler"],
- )
- check_gsoc_handler = getattr(
- gsoc_module,
- "check_gsoc_handler",
- lambda x: x.get("channel") == OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID,
- )
-
- check_gsoc_handler({"channel": channel_id})
-
- assert True
+ def test_check_gsoc_handler(self, channel_id):
+ """Test that check_gsoc_handler correctly identifies the GSOC channel."""
+ from apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc import check_gsoc_handler
+
+ result = check_gsoc_handler({"channel": channel_id})
+
+ # Verify the function returns True only for the GSOC channel
+ expected = (channel_id == OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID)
+ assert result == expectedThis approach directly imports the function, tests it with the generated channel_id, and verifies it returns the expected result based on whether the channel matches the GSOC channel ID.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def test_check_gsoc_handler(self, channel_id): | |
| gsoc_module = __import__( | |
| "apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc", | |
| fromlist=["gsoc_handler"], | |
| ) | |
| check_gsoc_handler = getattr( | |
| gsoc_module, | |
| "check_gsoc_handler", | |
| lambda x: x.get("channel") == OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID, | |
| ) | |
| check_gsoc_handler({"channel": channel_id}) | |
| assert True | |
| def test_check_gsoc_handler(self, channel_id): | |
| """Test that check_gsoc_handler correctly identifies the GSOC channel.""" | |
| from apps.slack.events.member_joined_channel.gsoc import check_gsoc_handler | |
| result = check_gsoc_handler({"channel": channel_id}) | |
| # Verify the function returns True only for the GSOC channel | |
| expected = (channel_id == OWASP_GSOC_CHANNEL_ID) | |
| assert result == expected |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
24-24: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
26-26: Blank line contains whitespace
Remove whitespace from blank line
(W293)
backend/tests/slack/events/fuzz_tests/user_joind_channel/gsoc_test.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@arkid15r Could you review the current changes before proceeding with the GraphQL endpoints? |
|
is someone still working on this? |
Yes, I just was discussing with the mentor. I will add the GraphQL tests tomorrow after resolving the new big conflicts :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
backend/tests/apps/core/api/algolia_test.py (5)
143-149: Refine hypothesis strategies to use more realistic bounds.The current strategies for generating test data are too broad and might produce extreme values that aren't representative of real API usage. This could lead to unnecessary test failures or miss important edge cases.
@given( - index_name=strategies.text(), - query=strategies.text(), - page=strategies.integers(), - hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), + index_name=strategies.text(min_size=1, max_size=100), + query=strategies.text(max_size=200), + page=strategies.integers(min_value=0, max_value=1000), + hits_per_page=strategies.integers(min_value=1, max_value=1000), facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), )
165-167: Assert additional properties for better test coverage.The current assertion only checks the status code, which is a good start but doesn't fully validate the behavior of the function. For a more comprehensive test, we should also verify response content for both successful and error cases.
response = algolia_search(mock_request) assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] +# Additional assertions based on status code +response_data = json.loads(response.content) +if response.status_code == requests.codes.ok: + assert "hits" in response_data + assert "nbPages" in response_data +elif response.status_code == requests.codes.bad_request: + assert "error" in response_data
143-167: Consider adding assume statements to help Hypothesis generate valid inputs.Hypothesis works more efficiently when it can avoid generating inputs that will always fail in uninteresting ways. Using
hypothesis.assume()can help focus the test on more meaningful scenarios.@given( index_name=strategies.text(), query=strategies.text(), page=strategies.integers(), hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), ) def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" + # Skip tests with inputs that will always fail in the same way + from hypothesis import assume + assume(isinstance(index_name, str) and len(index_name) > 0) + assume(isinstance(query, str)) + assume(isinstance(page, int) and page >= 0) + assume(isinstance(hits_per_page, int) and hits_per_page > 0) + assume(isinstance(facet_filters, list)) + with patch( "apps.core.api.algolia.get_search_results", return_value=MOCKED_SEARCH_RESULTS ): mock_request = Mock() mock_request.method = "POST" mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} mock_request.body = json.dumps( { "facetFilters": facet_filters, "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, "indexName": index_name, "page": page, "query": query, } ) response = algolia_search(mock_request) assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request]
143-167: Consider testing JSON serialization errors.The current test doesn't account for potential JSON serialization errors when complex objects are passed as parameters. Adding a test case for this scenario would improve test coverage.
Since this would require a separate test case that isn't directly part of the fuzz testing framework, here's a suggestion for an additional test method:
def test_algolia_search_invalid_json(self): """Test the scenario where the request body contains invalid JSON.""" mock_request = Mock() mock_request.method = "POST" mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} # Set body to invalid JSON mock_request.body = "{" response = algolia_search(mock_request) response_data = json.loads(response.content) assert response.status_code == requests.codes.bad_request assert "error" in response_data
143-167: Consider grouping test scenarios based on expected response.The current implementation treats all inputs as potentially valid or invalid. A more structured approach would be to separate test cases based on expected outcome, which would allow for more specific assertions.
This could be implemented by creating separate fuzz tests for valid and invalid scenarios:
- A test for valid inputs that assumes or enforces valid parameter values and asserts an OK response.
- A test for invalid inputs that introduces specific validation failures and asserts a BAD_REQUEST response.
This approach would provide more focused testing and clearer failure messages, making it easier to maintain and debug the tests.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
backend/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
backend/tests/apps/core/api/algolia_test.py(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: CodeQL (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
| @given( | ||
| index_name=strategies.text(), | ||
| query=strategies.text(), | ||
| page=strategies.integers(), | ||
| hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), | ||
| facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), | ||
| ) | ||
| def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): | ||
| """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" | ||
| mock_request = Mock() | ||
| mock_request.method = "POST" | ||
| mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} | ||
| mock_request.body = json.dumps( | ||
| { | ||
| "facetFilters": facet_filters, | ||
| "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, | ||
| "indexName": index_name, | ||
| "page": page, | ||
| "query": query, | ||
| } | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| response = algolia_search(mock_request) | ||
|
|
||
| assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing mock for get_search_results function.
Unlike the other test methods in this class, this fuzz test doesn't mock the get_search_results function. Without mocking, the test could make actual external API calls, which would make the test less reliable and potentially slow.
@given(
index_name=strategies.text(),
query=strategies.text(),
page=strategies.integers(),
hits_per_page=strategies.integers(),
facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()),
)
def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters):
"""Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing."""
+ with patch(
+ "apps.core.api.algolia.get_search_results", return_value=MOCKED_SEARCH_RESULTS
+ ):
mock_request = Mock()
mock_request.method = "POST"
mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS}
mock_request.body = json.dumps(
{
"facetFilters": facet_filters,
"hitsPerPage": hits_per_page,
"indexName": index_name,
"page": page,
"query": query,
}
)
response = algolia_search(mock_request)
assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @given( | |
| index_name=strategies.text(), | |
| query=strategies.text(), | |
| page=strategies.integers(), | |
| hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), | |
| facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), | |
| ) | |
| def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): | |
| """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" | |
| mock_request = Mock() | |
| mock_request.method = "POST" | |
| mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} | |
| mock_request.body = json.dumps( | |
| { | |
| "facetFilters": facet_filters, | |
| "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, | |
| "indexName": index_name, | |
| "page": page, | |
| "query": query, | |
| } | |
| ) | |
| response = algolia_search(mock_request) | |
| assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] | |
| @given( | |
| index_name=strategies.text(), | |
| query=strategies.text(), | |
| page=strategies.integers(), | |
| hits_per_page=strategies.integers(), | |
| facet_filters=strategies.lists(strategies.text()), | |
| ) | |
| def test_fuzz_algolia_search(self, index_name, query, page, hits_per_page, facet_filters): | |
| """Test the algolia_search function with fuzz testing.""" | |
| with patch( | |
| "apps.core.api.algolia.get_search_results", return_value=MOCKED_SEARCH_RESULTS | |
| ): | |
| mock_request = Mock() | |
| mock_request.method = "POST" | |
| mock_request.META = {"HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR": CLIENT_IP_ADDRESS} | |
| mock_request.body = json.dumps( | |
| { | |
| "facetFilters": facet_filters, | |
| "hitsPerPage": hits_per_page, | |
| "indexName": index_name, | |
| "page": page, | |
| "query": query, | |
| } | |
| ) | |
| response = algolia_search(mock_request) | |
| assert response.status_code in [requests.codes.ok, requests.codes.bad_request] |
…keFile and install model_bakery for creating randomized data for all models.
github-actions
bot
added
backend
docker
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/update-nest-test-images.yaml(1 hunks)Makefile(1 hunks)backend/Makefile(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/Makefile
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
- GitHub Check: Run backend tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
backend/docker/Dockerfile.graphql_fuzz (1)
23-24: Pin thegraphqlerinstall to a vetted release.Leaving this unpinned makes the fuzzing image non‑reproducible and exposes CI to upstream supply‑chain surprises. Lock it to the exact version you validated (and ideally add hashes) before shipping.
Apply this diff, replacing
<PINNED_VERSION>with the tested release:-RUN --mount=type=cache,target=${PIP_CACHE_DIR} \ - pip install graphqler --cache-dir ${PIP_CACHE_DIR} +ARG GRAPHQLER_VERSION=<PINNED_VERSION> +RUN --mount=type=cache,target=${PIP_CACHE_DIR} \ + pip install "graphqler==${GRAPHQLER_VERSION}" --cache-dir ${PIP_CACHE_DIR}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
backend/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz_tests(1 hunks)backend/docker/Dockerfile.graphql_fuzz(1 hunks)backend/settings/urls.py(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz_tests
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
backend/settings/urls.py (3)
frontend/src/utils/env.client.ts (1)
ENVIRONMENT(3-3)backend/apps/core/api/internal/csrf.py (1)
get_csrf_token(11-13)backend/apps/core/api/internal/algolia.py (1)
algolia_search(24-78)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Run backend tests
- GitHub Check: Run fuzz tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/settings/urls.py (1)
42-42: Confirm fuzz-test-driven CSRF exemption.rg found no tests matching “fuzz.*test.” Ensure GraphQL is indeed the sole fuzz target and that applying the conditional CSRF decorator is intentional—add or adjust tests or include a clarifying comment.
backend/settings/urls.py
Outdated
| def csrf_decorator(view_func): | ||
| """Apply CSRF protection or exemption based on the environment. | ||
| Args: | ||
| view_func (function): The view function to decorate. | ||
| Returns: | ||
| function: The decorated view function with CSRF protection or exemption. | ||
| """ | ||
| environment = settings.ENVIRONMENT | ||
| if environment == "Fuzz": | ||
| return csrf_exempt(view_func) # NOSONAR | ||
| return csrf_protect(view_func) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Critical: Add multiple safeguards to prevent accidental CSRF bypass in production.
Disabling CSRF protection for fuzz testing introduces a critical security risk if the "Fuzz" environment is ever enabled outside of controlled testing. The current implementation lacks defense-in-depth safeguards.
Recommended safeguards:
- Whitelist allowed environments and explicitly reject "Fuzz" in production:
def csrf_decorator(view_func):
"""Apply CSRF protection or exemption based on the environment.
Args:
view_func (function): The view function to decorate.
Returns:
function: The decorated view function with CSRF protection or exemption.
"""
+ # Prevent CSRF bypass in production
+ if settings.ENVIRONMENT == "Fuzz" and not settings.DEBUG:
+ raise ImproperlyConfigured(
+ "CSRF exemption for fuzz testing cannot be enabled when DEBUG=False"
+ )
+
environment = settings.ENVIRONMENT
if environment == "Fuzz":
return csrf_exempt(view_func) # NOSONAR
return csrf_protect(view_func)- Add environment variable validation in your settings file to ensure
ENVIRONMENTonly accepts valid values:
ALLOWED_ENVIRONMENTS = ["Development", "Test", "Staging", "Production", "Fuzz"]
if ENVIRONMENT not in ALLOWED_ENVIRONMENTS:
raise ImproperlyConfigured(f"Invalid ENVIRONMENT: {ENVIRONMENT}")
# Enforce Fuzz is only used in Docker/CI
if ENVIRONMENT == "Fuzz":
if not os.getenv("CI") and not os.getenv("DOCKER_CONTAINER"):
raise ImproperlyConfigured(
"Fuzz environment can only be used in CI or Docker containers"
)- Document the security implications of this decorator prominently in code and deployment docs.
Generate a script to verify the ENVIRONMENT setting is properly controlled:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify ENVIRONMENT variable safeguards and usage
# Check if ENVIRONMENT validation exists in settings
echo "=== Checking for ENVIRONMENT validation in settings ==="
rg -n --type py "ALLOWED_ENVIRONMENTS|ENVIRONMENT.*Fuzz" backend/settings/
# Check if any production configs could set ENVIRONMENT=Fuzz
echo -e "\n=== Checking for potential production Fuzz configs ==="
rg -n "ENVIRONMENT.*Fuzz" --glob "*.env*" --glob "*.yaml" --glob "*.yml" --glob "docker-compose*.yml"
# Verify Docker setup isolates Fuzz environment
echo -e "\n=== Checking Docker configuration for Fuzz isolation ==="
fd -e yml -e yaml -x cat {} \; | rg -A 5 -B 5 "Fuzz"Length of output: 169
Critical: Add fail-safe checks for CSRF exemption and validate ENVIRONMENT
- In
backend/settings/urls.py, updatecsrf_decoratorto raiseImproperlyConfiguredwhenENVIRONMENT == "Fuzz"andDEBUG is False, ensuring CSRF exemption only in controlled test environments. - In your settings file, define
ALLOWED_ENVIRONMENTS = ["Development","Test","Staging","Production","Fuzz"], validateENVIRONMENTagainst this list, and reject"Fuzz"outside Docker/CI contexts.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In backend/settings/urls.py around lines 23 to 36, the csrf_decorator must be
hardened: if settings.ENVIRONMENT == "Fuzz" and settings.DEBUG is False, raise
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured so CSRF exemption cannot be used in
non-test production runs; otherwise allow csrf_exempt when in Fuzz and debug
true, else use csrf_protect. Also add in your settings module a constant
ALLOWED_ENVIRONMENTS = ["Development","Test","Staging","Production","Fuzz"] and
validate that settings.ENVIRONMENT is one of those values at startup, raising
ImproperlyConfigured for unknown values; when ENVIRONMENT=="Fuzz" ensure an
additional guard that it only runs in controlled CI/Docker contexts (e.g.
require CI or IN_DOCKER env var or presence of /.dockerenv) and reject Fuzz if
those indicators are absent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/update-nest-test-images.yaml(1 hunks)backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz_tests(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/update-nest-test-images.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Run fuzz tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
- GitHub Check: Run backend tests
backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz_tests
Outdated
| COPY --from=builder --chmod=555 --chown=root:root /home/owasp /home/owasp | ||
|
|
||
| RUN touch /home/owasp/fuzz_tests.db && \ | ||
| chmod +x /home/owasp/fuzz_tests.db /home/owasp/entrypoint.sh | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix ownership and write permissions for /home/owasp artifacts.
We copy the build output with --chown=root:root --chmod=555, then run the container as the owasp user. That combination makes /home/owasp effectively read-only for the runtime user, and fuzz_tests.db is owned by root with no write bit. When entrypoint.sh runs migrations or writes to the sqlite DB, it will fail with permission denied. Please keep the directory owned by owasp (and make the DB writable) before dropping privileges.
Apply this diff:
-COPY --from=builder --chmod=555 --chown=root:root /home/owasp /home/owasp
-RUN touch /home/owasp/fuzz_tests.db && \
- chmod +x /home/owasp/fuzz_tests.db /home/owasp/entrypoint.sh
+COPY --from=builder --chown=owasp:owasp /home/owasp /home/owasp
+RUN touch /home/owasp/fuzz_tests.db && \
+ chown owasp:owasp /home/owasp/fuzz_tests.db /home/owasp/entrypoint.sh && \
+ chmod 664 /home/owasp/fuzz_tests.db && \
+ chmod 755 /home/owasp/entrypoint.sh🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz_tests around lines 62 to 66 the build stage
copies /home/owasp as root with --chown=root:root --chmod=555, leaving the
runtime owasp user unable to write the sqlite DB; change the post-copy steps to
chown the directory and files to owasp:owasp and set the DB to be writable by
that user (and ensure the directory permissions allow traversal/writes for
owasp) before dropping privileges or switching users so migrations and runtime
writes succeed.
|
Since we use a sqlite db for fuzz testing, some migrations fail due to sqlite limitations. Also, there are strawberry permissions required for accessing the endpoint from graphqler side. Suggest an approach to resolve that @coderabbitai |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 3508 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 8334 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 3253 @ahmedxgouda I've analyzed your setup and found the root causes of both issues. Here are multiple approaches to resolve them: Issue 1: SQLite Migration FailuresSQLite has limitations with certain ALTER operations (rename columns, change constraints, etc.). Here are several solutions: Option 1: Use PostgreSQL for Fuzz Testing (Recommended)# backend/settings/fuzz.py
"""OWASP Nest Fuzz configuration."""
from configurations import values
from settings.base import Base
class Fuzz(Base):
"""Fuzz configuration."""
BASE_DIR = Base.BASE_DIR
DEBUG = True
APP_NAME = "OWASP Nest Fuzz"
# Use PostgreSQL instead of SQLite
DATABASES = {
"default": {
"ENGINE": "django.db.backends.postgresql",
"NAME": values.Value("fuzz_db", environ_name="POSTGRES_DB"),
"USER": values.Value("postgres", environ_name="POSTGRES_USER"),
"PASSWORD": values.Value("postgres", environ_name="POSTGRES_PASSWORD"),
"HOST": values.Value("localhost", environ_name="POSTGRES_HOST"),
"PORT": values.Value("5432", environ_name="POSTGRES_PORT"),
}
}
IP_ADDRESS = values.Value()
ALLOWED_HOSTS = ["*"]Then add a PostgreSQL service to your services:
db:
image: postgres:15-alpine
environment:
POSTGRES_DB: fuzz_db
POSTGRES_USER: postgres
POSTGRES_PASSWORD: postgres
healthcheck:
test: ["CMD-SHELL", "pg_isready -U postgres"]
interval: 5s
timeout: 5s
retries: 5
backend:
depends_on:
db:
condition: service_healthy
environment:
POSTGRES_HOST: db
POSTGRES_DB: fuzz_db
POSTGRES_USER: postgres
POSTGRES_PASSWORD: postgres
# ... rest of backend configOption 2: Skip Problematic Migrations# backend/docker/entrypoint_fuzz.sh
#!/bin/sh
# Run syncdb instead of migrate to avoid migration issues
python manage.py migrate --run-syncdb --noinput
# OR selectively fake certain migrations
python manage.py migrate slack --fake 0009
python manage.py migrate slack --fake 0015
python manage.py migrate
python manage.py collectstatic --noinput
python manage.py load_data
pytest fuzz_tests
python manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:8000Option 3: Use In-Memory SQLite with Simplified Schema# backend/settings/fuzz.py
class Fuzz(Base):
"""Fuzz configuration."""
BASE_DIR = Base.BASE_DIR
DEBUG = True
APP_NAME = "OWASP Nest Fuzz"
# Use in-memory SQLite (faster but migrations still an issue)
DATABASES = {
"default": {
"ENGINE": "django.db.backends.sqlite3",
"NAME": ":memory:",
"TEST": {
"NAME": ":memory:",
},
}
}
IP_ADDRESS = values.Value()
ALLOWED_HOSTS = ["*"]Then create tables directly: # backend/docker/entrypoint_fuzz.sh
#!/bin/sh
# Create tables directly without running migrations
python manage.py migrate --run-syncdb --noinput
python manage.py collectstatic --noinput
python manage.py load_data
pytest fuzz_tests
python manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:8000Issue 2: Strawberry Permission RequirementsGraphQLer needs to bypass authentication checks. Here are several approaches: Option 1: Override Permission Classes in Fuzz Environment (Recommended)# backend/settings/fuzz.py
"""OWASP Nest Fuzz configuration."""
from configurations import values
from settings.base import Base
class Fuzz(Base):
"""Fuzz configuration."""
BASE_DIR = Base.BASE_DIR
DEBUG = True
APP_NAME = "OWASP Nest Fuzz"
# Disable permissions for fuzz testing
DISABLE_PERMISSIONS = True
DATABASES = {
"default": {
"ENGINE": "django.db.backends.sqlite3",
"NAME": BASE_DIR / "fuzz_tests.db",
}
}
IP_ADDRESS = values.Value()
ALLOWED_HOSTS = ["*"]Then create a fuzz-specific permission class: # backend/apps/common/permissions.py (create this file)
"""Common permission utilities."""
from django.conf import settings
from strawberry.permission import BasePermission
class FuzzBypassPermission(BasePermission):
"""Permission class that bypasses checks in Fuzz environment."""
def has_permission(self, source, info, **kwargs) -> bool:
"""Always allow access in Fuzz environment."""
if getattr(settings, 'DISABLE_PERMISSIONS', False):
return True
# Fallback to the original permission logic if needed
return FalseUpdate existing permission classes: # backend/apps/owasp/api/internal/permissions/project_health_metrics.py
"""Strawberry Permission Classes for Project Health Metrics."""
from django.conf import settings
from strawberry.permission import BasePermission
class HasDashboardAccess(BasePermission):
"""Permission class to check if the user has dashboard access."""
message = "You must have dashboard access to access this resource."
def has_permission(self, source, info, **kwargs) -> bool:
"""Check if the user has dashboard access."""
# Bypass permission checks in Fuzz environment
if getattr(settings, 'DISABLE_PERMISSIONS', False):
return True
return (
(user := info.context.request.user)
and user.is_authenticated
and user.github_user.is_owasp_staff
)Option 2: Create a Test User and Mock Authentication# backend/docker/entrypoint_fuzz.sh
#!/bin/sh
python manage.py migrate
python manage.py collectstatic --noinput
# Create a test superuser
echo "from django.contrib.auth import get_user_model; from apps.github.models import GithubUser; User = get_user_model(); user = User.objects.create_superuser('fuzztest', '[email protected]', 'fuzzpass123') if not User.objects.filter(username='fuzztest').exists() else User.objects.get(username='fuzztest'); GithubUser.objects.get_or_create(user=user, defaults={'github_id': 999999, 'login': 'fuzztest', 'is_owasp_staff': True})" | python manage.py shell
python manage.py load_data
pytest fuzz_tests
python manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:8000Then modify GraphQLer entrypoint to authenticate: # backend/docker/entrypoint_graphql_fuzz.sh
#!/bin/sh
echo "Retrieving CSRF token and authenticating..."
# Get CSRF token
CSRF_TOKEN=$(curl -s http://backend:8000/csrf/ | jq -r '.csrftoken')
if [ -z "$CSRF_TOKEN" ]; then
echo "Failed to retrieve CSRF token"
exit 1
fi
# Login to get session cookie (you'll need to add a login endpoint)
SESSION_COOKIE=$(curl -s -c - -b - -X POST \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "X-CSRFToken: $CSRF_TOKEN" \
-d '{"username":"fuzztest","password":"fuzzpass123"}' \
http://backend:8000/api/v0/login/ | grep sessionid | awk '{print $7}')
cat > /home/owasp/config.toml << EOF
[CUSTOM_HEADERS]
X-CSRF-Token = "$CSRF_TOKEN"
Cookie = "sessionid=$SESSION_COOKIE"
EOF
echo "Starting fuzzing tests..."
python -m graphqler --config /home/owasp/config.toml --url http://backend:8000/graphql/ --mode run --path /home/owasp/fuzzing_resultsOption 3: Disable Authentication Middleware in Fuzz Environment# backend/settings/fuzz.py
"""OWASP Nest Fuzz configuration."""
from configurations import values
from settings.base import Base
class Fuzz(Base):
"""Fuzz configuration."""
BASE_DIR = Base.BASE_DIR
DEBUG = True
APP_NAME = "OWASP Nest Fuzz"
DATABASES = {
"default": {
"ENGINE": "django.db.backends.sqlite3",
"NAME": BASE_DIR / "fuzz_tests.db",
}
}
# Create a custom middleware that mocks authentication
MIDDLEWARE = [
"corsheaders.middleware.CorsMiddleware",
"django.middleware.security.SecurityMiddleware",
"django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware",
"django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware",
"django.middleware.csrf.CsrfViewMiddleware",
"apps.common.middleware.FuzzAuthenticationMiddleware", # Custom middleware
"django.contrib.messages.middleware.MessageMiddleware",
]
IP_ADDRESS = values.Value()
ALLOWED_HOSTS = ["*"]Create the custom middleware: # backend/apps/common/middleware.py (create this file)
"""Common middleware."""
from django.contrib.auth import get_user_model
from django.contrib.auth.models import AnonymousUser
from apps.github.models import GithubUser
class FuzzAuthenticationMiddleware:
"""Middleware to mock authentication for fuzz testing."""
def __init__(self, get_response):
"""Initialize the middleware."""
self.get_response = get_response
self._fuzz_user = None
def __call__(self, request):
"""Process the request."""
# Create or get a test user with dashboard access
if not self._fuzz_user:
User = get_user_model()
self._fuzz_user, created = User.objects.get_or_create(
username='fuzztest',
defaults={
'email': '[email protected]',
'is_staff': True,
'is_superuser': True,
}
)
if created:
self._fuzz_user.set_password('fuzzpass123')
self._fuzz_user.save()
# Ensure GithubUser exists with is_owasp_staff=True
GithubUser.objects.get_or_create(
user=self._fuzz_user,
defaults={
'github_id': 999999,
'login': 'fuzztest',
'is_owasp_staff': True,
}
)
# Attach the user to the request
request.user = self._fuzz_user
response = self.get_response(request)
return responseRecommended ApproachI recommend combining Option 1 for migrations (PostgreSQL) with Option 1 for permissions (Override in Fuzz environment):
This approach is clean, maintainable, and doesn't require complex authentication mocking. The changes are isolated to the Fuzz environment and won't affect production code. Would you like me to provide the complete implementation for any of these approaches? |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
backend/apps/owasp/api/internal/permissions/project_health_metrics.py (2)
3-3: Add inline documentation for the bypass logic.Include a comment explaining that this bypass is specifically for fuzz testing to improve code clarity and prevent future confusion.
Apply this diff:
+from django.conf import settings -from django.conf import settings from strawberry.permission import BasePermission class HasDashboardAccess(BasePermission): """Permission class to check if the user has dashboard access.""" message = "You must have dashboard access to access this resource." def has_permission(self, source, info, **kwargs) -> bool: """Check if the user has dashboard access.""" + # Bypass permissions in fuzz testing environment only. + # DISABLE_PERMISSIONS should ONLY be True in backend/settings/fuzz.py. if settings.DISABLE_PERMISSIONS: return TrueAlso applies to: 14-15
14-15: Clarify permission bypass purpose
Add an inline comment above theif settings.DISABLE_PERMISSIONS:guard inbackend/apps/owasp/api/internal/permissions/project_health_metrics.pyto explicitly document that this branch is only active under the fuzz-testing settings module (backend/settings/fuzz.py).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/update-nest-test-images.yaml(1 hunks)backend/apps/owasp/api/internal/permissions/project_health_metrics.py(2 hunks)backend/docker/entrypoint_fuzz.sh(1 hunks)backend/settings/fuzz.py(1 hunks)docker-compose/backend-fuzz.yaml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- backend/settings/fuzz.py
- backend/docker/entrypoint_fuzz.sh
- .github/workflows/update-nest-test-images.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
- GitHub Check: Run backend tests
- GitHub Check: Run fuzz tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
github-actions
bot
added
docs
github-actions
bot
removed
docs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
backend/apps/owasp/api/internal/permissions/project_health_metrics.py (1)
3-3: Critical: GraphQL permission bypass has same production leak risk.This bypass mirrors the one in
views/permissions.py, extending the E2E permission override to GraphQL endpoints. The same critical security concern applies: ifIS_E2E_ENVIRONMENTis accidentally enabled in production, all GraphQL dashboard queries and mutations become accessible without authentication.Apply the same safeguards recommended in the previous file:
- Use
getattr(settings, 'IS_E2E_ENVIRONMENT', False)for safe defaults.- Add production environment checks that fail-fast if E2E mode is enabled with
DEBUG=False.- Document this security-sensitive bypass.
The verification script from
backend/apps/owasp/api/internal/views/permissions.pywill check the configuration ofIS_E2E_ENVIRONMENTacross all settings files, including safeguards for this GraphQL permission class.Also applies to: 14-15
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/apps/owasp/api/internal/views/permissions.py (1)
5-5: Consider defensive improvements for the E2E environment bypass.The
IS_E2E_ENVIRONMENTsetting already has a safe default (Falsein base.py) and all settings classes inherit from the Base class, so there is no AttributeError risk. Settings isolation via theDJANGO_CONFIGURATIONenvironment variable prevents accidental production exposure.Optional improvements for additional safety:
- Use
getattr(settings, 'IS_E2E_ENVIRONMENT', False)for explicit defensive coding.- Add a validation in production settings that raises an error if
IS_E2E_ENVIRONMENT=TrueandDEBUG=False.- Add inline comments explaining this is intentional for E2E testing only.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
backend/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/update-nest-test-images.yaml(1 hunks)backend/Makefile(1 hunks)backend/apps/owasp/api/internal/permissions/project_health_metrics.py(2 hunks)backend/apps/owasp/api/internal/views/permissions.py(1 hunks)backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz(1 hunks)backend/docker/entrypoint.fuzz.sh(1 hunks)backend/pyproject.toml(1 hunks)cspell/custom-dict.txt(1 hunks)docker-compose/e2e.yaml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- backend/Makefile
- .github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
Repo: OWASP/Nest PR: 1714
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/data/mockProjectsDashboardOverviewData.ts:12-14
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T16:25:39.325Z
Learning: In the OWASP Nest project, exact mathematical accuracy in mock data is not required. Mock data values can be simplified or rounded for testing purposes, as the focus is on testing functionality rather than precise calculations.
Learnt from: rudransh-shrivastava
Repo: OWASP/Nest PR: 2431
File: infrastructure/providers.tf:1-3
Timestamp: 2025-10-17T15:25:55.624Z
Learning: The infrastructure code in the OWASP/Nest repository (infrastructure/ directory) is intended for quick testing purposes only, not for production deployment.
📚 Learning: 2025-08-31T13:48:09.830Z
Learnt from: rudransh-shrivastava
Repo: OWASP/Nest PR: 2155
File: frontend/graphql-codegen.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-31T13:48:09.830Z
Learning: In the OWASP/Nest project, Django's GraphQL endpoint accepts CSRF tokens via 'x-csrftoken' header (lowercase) without requiring a Referer header, working fine in their configuration for GraphQL codegen introspection.
Applied to files:
backend/docker/entrypoint.fuzz.sh
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
backend/docker/entrypoint.fuzz.sh (1)
backend/apps/ai/agent/agent.py (1)
run(27-52)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
- GitHub Check: Run fuzz tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
- GitHub Check: Run backend tests
🔇 Additional comments (3)
cspell/custom-dict.txt (1)
71-71: LGTM!The entry is correctly alphabetized and supports the new Graphqler fuzz testing infrastructure.
.github/workflows/update-nest-test-images.yaml (1)
74-74: LGTM!The tag syntax update is correct (colon separator for image:tag format).
backend/pyproject.toml (1)
57-57: No security issues, but version is outdated.Hypothesis
^6.129.4was released March 18, 2025. The latest version as of December 2025 is 6.148.7 (released December 5). No known security vulnerabilities were found for version 6.129.4. The caret constraint (^) appropriately allows updates to newer minor versions, which will pull in current releases when dependencies are updated. Consider runningpip list --outdatedor updating explicitly to the latest version if stricter currency requirements are needed.
| cache-from: type=registry,ref=owasp/nest:test-fuzz-backend-cache | ||
| cache-to: type=registry,ref=owasp/nest:test-fuzz-backend-cache,mode=max | ||
| context: backend | ||
| file: backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz_tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix Dockerfile filename mismatch.
Line 82 references backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz_tests, but the actual Dockerfile added in the PR is backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz. This mismatch will cause the Docker build to fail.
- file: backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz_tests
+ file: backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| file: backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz_tests | |
| file: backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/update-nest-test-images.yaml around line 82: the workflow
references backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz_tests but the actual file added in the
PR is backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz; update the workflow to use the correct
filename (backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz) so the Docker build step points to the
existing file, and verify there are no other references to the old name
elsewhere in the workflow.
| @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | |||
| FROM omar2535/graphqler:latest | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pin the Graphqler base image to a specific version.
Using the latest tag undermines reproducibility and can cause unpredictable failures if the upstream image is updated. Pin to a specific version tag for consistency across CI/CD runs and developer environments.
-FROM omar2535/graphqler:latest
+FROM omar2535/graphqler:v0.7.0 # Replace with verified stable versionVerify the available versions at the Docker Hub repository and update the version tag accordingly.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz around line 1, the base image uses the
floating 'omar2535/graphqler:latest' tag which breaks reproducibility; replace
'latest' with a specific released version (e.g. omar2535/graphqler:<VERSION>) by
checking the image tags on Docker Hub and choosing the appropriate semantically
versioned tag, then update the Dockerfile to that exact tag and, if applicable,
bump any documentation or CI references to match the chosen pinned version.
backend/docker/entrypoint.fuzz.sh
Outdated
| set -e | ||
|
|
||
| echo "Fetching CSRF token..." | ||
| CSRF_TOKEN=$(wget -qO- http://backend:9000/csrf | jq -r '.csrftoken') | ||
|
|
||
| echo "Creating configuration file with custom headers..." | ||
| touch ./config.toml | ||
|
|
||
| echo "[CUSTOM_HEADERS]" >> ./config.toml | ||
| echo "X-CSRFToken = \"$CSRF_TOKEN\"" >> ./config.toml | ||
| echo "Cookie = \"csrftoken=$CSRF_TOKEN;\"" >> ./config.toml | ||
|
|
||
| echo "Running Graphqler with custom configuration..." | ||
| uv run graphqler --mode run --url http://backend:9000/graphql/ --path ./ --config ./config.toml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for CSRF token fetch and validation.
The script assumes the /csrf endpoint exists and returns valid JSON with a csrftoken field, but lacks error handling if the backend is not ready, the endpoint is unavailable, or the response format is unexpected. A missing or empty CSRF token will be silently used, causing graphqler to fail.
set -e
echo "Fetching CSRF token..."
-CSRF_TOKEN=$(wget -qO- http://backend:9000/csrf | jq -r '.csrftoken')
+CSRF_TOKEN=$(wget -qO- http://backend:9000/csrf | jq -r '.csrftoken' 2>/dev/null || echo "")
+
+if [ -z "$CSRF_TOKEN" ]; then
+ echo "Error: Failed to fetch CSRF token from backend." >&2
+ exit 1
+fi📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| set -e | |
| echo "Fetching CSRF token..." | |
| CSRF_TOKEN=$(wget -qO- http://backend:9000/csrf | jq -r '.csrftoken') | |
| echo "Creating configuration file with custom headers..." | |
| touch ./config.toml | |
| echo "[CUSTOM_HEADERS]" >> ./config.toml | |
| echo "X-CSRFToken = \"$CSRF_TOKEN\"" >> ./config.toml | |
| echo "Cookie = \"csrftoken=$CSRF_TOKEN;\"" >> ./config.toml | |
| echo "Running Graphqler with custom configuration..." | |
| uv run graphqler --mode run --url http://backend:9000/graphql/ --path ./ --config ./config.toml | |
| set -e | |
| echo "Fetching CSRF token..." | |
| CSRF_TOKEN=$(wget -qO- http://backend:9000/csrf | jq -r '.csrftoken' 2>/dev/null || echo "") | |
| if [ -z "$CSRF_TOKEN" ]; then | |
| echo "Error: Failed to fetch CSRF token from backend." >&2 | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| echo "Creating configuration file with custom headers..." | |
| touch ./config.toml | |
| echo "[CUSTOM_HEADERS]" >> ./config.toml | |
| echo "X-CSRFToken = \"$CSRF_TOKEN\"" >> ./config.toml | |
| echo "Cookie = \"csrftoken=$CSRF_TOKEN;\"" >> ./config.toml | |
| echo "Running Graphqler with custom configuration..." | |
| uv run graphqler --mode run --url http://backend:9000/graphql/ --path ./ --config ./config.toml |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In backend/docker/entrypoint.fuzz.sh around lines 3 to 16, the script fetches
the CSRF token without any error handling or validation; change the logic to
retry the /csrf fetch with a short backoff and timeout (e.g. loop up to N
seconds/attempts), check the wget/curl exit status and parse result safely with
jq, verify the csrftoken is non-empty and valid before proceeding, and if the
fetch fails or token is empty log a clear error and exit non‑zero; only
create/write config.toml and run graphqler after successful validation of the
CSRF token.
| graphql: | ||
| container_name: nest-fuzz-test-graphql | ||
| build: | ||
| context: ../backend/docker | ||
| dockerfile: Dockerfile.fuzz | ||
| entrypoint: | ||
| - /app/entrypoint.sh | ||
| depends_on: | ||
| backend: | ||
| condition: service_healthy | ||
| networks: | ||
| - e2e-nest-network |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
# First, let's find and examine the entrypoint script
find . -name "entrypoint.sh" -o -name "entrypoint*.sh" | head -20Repository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 120
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for graphqler references in the codebase
rg -i "graphqler" --type-list | head -5
rg -i "graphqler" -l 2>/dev/null | head -20Repository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 730
🏁 Script executed:
# Check for fuzz-related configuration in the entire docker-compose/e2e.yaml
cat -n docker-compose/e2e.yamlRepository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 2426
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for CI workflows that handle fuzz testing or results
find .github/workflows -name "*.yml" -o -name "*.yaml" 2>/dev/null | xargs ls -la 2>/dev/nullRepository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 687
🏁 Script executed:
# Look for any volume definitions or artifact collection in docker-compose
rg -n "volumes|artifacts|results" docker-compose/ -C 2Repository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 4646
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the entrypoint.sh script
cat -n ./backend/docker/entrypoint.shRepository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 277
🏁 Script executed:
# Read the entrypoint.fuzz.sh script
cat -n ./backend/docker/entrypoint.fuzz.shRepository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 670
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for how fuzz results are handled in CI workflows
rg -n "fuzz\|graphql" .github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml -C 3Repository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 36
🏁 Script executed:
# Check the Dockerfile.fuzz to understand the build context
cat -n ./backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzzRepository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 341
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for any discussion or context about the graphql/fuzz service in issues or PRs
rg -i "fuzz.*graphql|graphql.*fuzz" --type-list 2>&1 | head -20
rg -i "fuzz.*graphql|graphql.*fuzz" . -l 2>/dev/null | head -10Repository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 469
🏁 Script executed:
# Check if graphqler is mentioned anywhere else or if there's documentation
rg -i "graphqler" . -B 2 -A 2 2>/dev/null | head -50Repository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 3534
🏁 Script executed:
# Look for any exit behavior testing or container cleanup logic
rg -i "exit|cleanup|stop.*container" docker-compose/e2e.yaml -C 3Repository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 36
🏁 Script executed:
# Check what's in the Dockerfile.fuzz to understand the full container setup
head -30 ./backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzzRepository: OWASP/Nest
Length of output: 264
Configure result persistence and exit behavior for the GraphQL fuzz service.
The service currently has no mechanism to persist test artifacts or explicitly manage container lifecycle:
- No volumes defined to capture graphqler output (crash reports, coverage data, configuration files)
- Entrypoint script does not explicitly handle exit behavior after graphqler completes
- Results will be lost when the container exits, making it impossible to debug failures or analyze fuzz coverage
Add volume mounts to persist fuzz results (e.g., ./fuzz-results:/app/results), configure graphqler to output results to a volume-mounted directory, and verify the entrypoint script exits cleanly after fuzzing completes.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docker-compose/e2e.yaml around lines 63 to 74, the graphql service lacks
persistence for fuzz artifacts and a clear exit strategy; add a volume mount
(example: ./fuzz-results:/app/results) on the service and configure the
graphqler invocation (or its config) to write crashes/coverage/config files into
/app/results, ensure the entrypoint script captures graphqler exit code,
flushes/writes any final files into /app/results, and exits with the same status
so results are preserved and the container lifecycle reflects test outcome; also
ensure the host directory is created/permissioned as needed.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
backend/docker/entrypoint.fuzz.sh (1)
5-6: CSRF token fetch lacks error handling and validation (unresolved from prior review).This issue was previously flagged but remains unresolved. The current implementation has multiple hazards:
- No validation: If the CSRF token is empty or malformed, the script silently proceeds, causing graphqler to fail later.
- No retry logic: The backend may not be immediately ready; a transient network error will cause the script to fail without retries.
- Silent failure: If
jqfails to parse or the field doesn't exist, it returns an empty string with no error indication.The
set -eonly catches hard exits from commands, not empty/malformed outputs.Apply this diff with proper validation and retry logic:
set -e echo "Fetching CSRF token..." -CSRF_TOKEN=$(wget -qO- http://backend:9000/csrf | jq -r '.csrftoken') +MAX_ATTEMPTS=30 +ATTEMPT=0 +CSRF_TOKEN="" + +while [ $ATTEMPT -lt $MAX_ATTEMPTS ]; do + CSRF_TOKEN=$(wget -q -T 5 -O- http://backend:9000/csrf 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.csrftoken // empty' 2>/dev/null || echo "") + if [ -n "$CSRF_TOKEN" ] && [ ${#CSRF_TOKEN} -gt 10 ]; then + echo "CSRF token fetched successfully." + break + fi + ATTEMPT=$((ATTEMPT + 1)) + if [ $ATTEMPT -lt $MAX_ATTEMPTS ]; then + echo "CSRF token fetch attempt $ATTEMPT/$MAX_ATTEMPTS failed. Retrying in 1 second..." + sleep 1 + fi +done + +if [ -z "$CSRF_TOKEN" ] || [ ${#CSRF_TOKEN} -le 10 ]; then + echo "Error: Failed to fetch valid CSRF token after $MAX_ATTEMPTS attempts." >&2 + exit 1 +fiThis implementation:
- Retries up to 30 times with 1-second backoff (configurable).
- Sets a 5-second timeout per wget request.
- Validates token length (Django CSRF tokens are typically 32+ chars).
- Provides clear error messages on failure.
- Exits with code 1 if validation fails.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml(1 hunks)backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz(1 hunks)backend/docker/entrypoint.fuzz.sh(1 hunks)docker-compose/e2e.yaml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- docker-compose/e2e.yaml
- .github/workflows/run-ci-cd.yaml
- backend/docker/Dockerfile.fuzz
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-08-31T13:48:09.830Z
Learnt from: rudransh-shrivastava
Repo: OWASP/Nest PR: 2155
File: frontend/graphql-codegen.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-31T13:48:09.830Z
Learning: In the OWASP/Nest project, Django's GraphQL endpoint accepts CSRF tokens via 'x-csrftoken' header (lowercase) without requiring a Referer header, working fine in their configuration for GraphQL codegen introspection.
Applied to files:
backend/docker/entrypoint.fuzz.sh
📚 Learning: 2025-08-30T12:52:32.214Z
Learnt from: rudransh-shrivastava
Repo: OWASP/Nest PR: 2155
File: frontend/graphql-codegen.ts:52-52
Timestamp: 2025-08-30T12:52:32.214Z
Learning: When using GraphQL Codegen with async configuration that needs to fetch data (like CSRF tokens), export the async function directly instead of using top-level await: `export default async function()` rather than `export default await function()`.
Applied to files:
backend/docker/entrypoint.fuzz.sh
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Run frontend e2e tests
- GitHub Check: Run backend tests
- GitHub Check: Run fuzz tests
- GitHub Check: Run frontend unit tests
| echo "Creating configuration file with custom headers..." | ||
| touch ./config.toml | ||
|
|
||
| echo "[CUSTOM_HEADERS]" >> ./config.toml | ||
| echo "X-CSRFToken = \"$CSRF_TOKEN\"" >> ./config.toml | ||
| echo "Cookie = \"csrftoken=$CSRF_TOKEN;\"" >> ./config.toml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
Validate CSRF token before writing to config file.
Even with the retry logic fix above, the config file should only be created after successful token validation. Currently, if token validation fails midway, the script may leave behind a malformed config.toml. Restructure to validate first, then create config.
Suggested approach:
- Validate token (see fix in previous comment).
- Only after validation succeeds, create and populate config.toml.
- This ensures config.toml is never written with an invalid or empty token.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In backend/docker/entrypoint.fuzz.sh around lines 8-13, the script currently
creates and writes config.toml before verifying the CSRF token which can leave a
malformed file if validation fails; change the flow to validate the CSRF_TOKEN
first (using the existing retry/validation logic from the prior fix), and only
after validation succeeds create and populate ./config.toml; to be safe, either
write to a temporary file and move it into place atomically or ensure any
existing ./config.toml is not modified/created unless validation passes, and if
validation ultimately fails, exit with a non-zero status without leaving a
partial config file.
| echo "Running Graphqler with custom configuration..." | ||
| uv run graphqler --mode run --url $GRAPHQL_URL --path ./ --config ./config.toml |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Quote unquoted shell variables to prevent word-splitting and glob expansion.
The $GRAPHQL_URL variable is unquoted, which can cause word-splitting or glob expansion if it contains spaces or special characters. Additionally, the --path argument should quote its value.
Apply this diff:
-uv run graphqler --mode run --url $GRAPHQL_URL --path ./ --config ./config.toml
+uv run graphqler --mode run --url "$GRAPHQL_URL" --path "./" --config "./config.toml"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| echo "Running Graphqler with custom configuration..." | |
| uv run graphqler --mode run --url $GRAPHQL_URL --path ./ --config ./config.toml | |
| echo "Running Graphqler with custom configuration..." | |
| uv run graphqler --mode run --url "$GRAPHQL_URL" --path "./" --config "./config.toml" |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In backend/docker/entrypoint.fuzz.sh around lines 15-16, the shell variables and
path arguments are unquoted which can cause word-splitting or glob expansion;
update the uv run command to quote the GRAPHQL_URL variable and the path/config
values (e.g., use "--url \"$GRAPHQL_URL\"" and quote the --path and --config
arguments) so all variable expansions are properly quoted.
2 participants
Resolves #1075