Add report reviewer agent#7
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new GitHub agent configuration file is added to define a Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/agents/report-reviewer.md (1)
8-11: Require immutable report references for reproducible reviews.A plain GitHub URL can point to moving content (
main). Require a pinnedblob/<commit_sha>/...URL (or commit SHA) to keep review results traceable and reproducible.Suggested prompt fix
- The user will specify: -- **Report URL**: the GitHub URL of the report markdown file to review + The user will specify: +- **Report URL**: the GitHub URL of the report markdown file to review (prefer a pinned `blob/<commit_sha>/...` URL for reproducibility) - **Use case description**: the specific qualification or evaluation use case (e.g., a CYP enzyme DDI/DDGI network, pediatric ontogeny qualification, special population qualification, compound PBPK model evaluation)Based on learnings: For repositories in the Open-Systems-Pharmacology organization, user Yuri05 prefers actionable code implementations; if you want, I can provide a follow-up
[plan_code_changes]patch set for this file.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.github/agents/report-reviewer.md around lines 8 - 11, Update the "Report URL" requirement in the report-reviewer instructions so it mandates an immutable, pinned reference: require a blob/<commit_sha>/... GitHub URL or an explicit commit SHA (instead of an unpinned branch URL like main) and update the phrasing of the "Report URL: the GitHub URL of the report markdown file to review" line to reflect this; also add a short note describing acceptable formats (pinned blob URL or repo+path+commit SHA) and optional validation guidance so the agent can reject unpinned URLs.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.github/agents/report-reviewer.md:
- Line 27: Update the instruction text that currently says "Create a Markdown
file" to explicitly ask the reviewer to "return Markdown content in the reply"
(i.e., include the full report as Markdown in the agent's response rather than
creating a file); edit the sentence in .github/agents/report-reviewer.md so it
clarifies output mode and avoid ambiguity for agent execution flows, and
optionally add the suggested prompt note under the existing details summary to
show an example phrasing for reviewers.
---
Nitpick comments:
In @.github/agents/report-reviewer.md:
- Around line 8-11: Update the "Report URL" requirement in the report-reviewer
instructions so it mandates an immutable, pinned reference: require a
blob/<commit_sha>/... GitHub URL or an explicit commit SHA (instead of an
unpinned branch URL like main) and update the phrasing of the "Report URL: the
GitHub URL of the report markdown file to review" line to reflect this; also add
a short note describing acceptable formats (pinned blob URL or repo+path+commit
SHA) and optional validation guidance so the agent can reject unpinned URLs.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 746daa26-d5b6-4109-a24c-b36c131b1c75
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/agents/report-reviewer.md
| 9. **Writing quality and structure**: Grammar, clarity, logical flow, and adherence to a consistent report structure. Is the report self-contained and understandable to its target audience? | ||
| 10. **Conclusions and limitations**: Are the conclusions supported by the presented results? Are limitations of the model or evaluation honestly discussed? | ||
|
|
||
| Create a Markdown file with your detailed findings organized by the categories above, including specific suggestions for improvements with references to exact sections, tables, or figures. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify output mode: return Markdown in-chat instead of “create a file.”
“Create a Markdown file” is ambiguous for an agent response flow and can cause execution mismatch. Make the instruction explicit that the reviewer should return Markdown content in the reply.
Suggested prompt fix
-Create a Markdown file with your detailed findings organized by the categories above, including specific suggestions for improvements with references to exact sections, tables, or figures.
+Return a Markdown review in your response, organized by the categories above, including specific suggestions for improvement with references to exact sections, tables, or figures.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Create a Markdown file with your detailed findings organized by the categories above, including specific suggestions for improvements with references to exact sections, tables, or figures. | |
| Return a Markdown review in your response, organized by the categories above, including specific suggestions for improvement with references to exact sections, tables, or figures. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.github/agents/report-reviewer.md at line 27, Update the instruction text
that currently says "Create a Markdown file" to explicitly ask the reviewer to
"return Markdown content in the reply" (i.e., include the full report as
Markdown in the agent's response rather than creating a file); edit the sentence
in .github/agents/report-reviewer.md so it clarifies output mode and avoid
ambiguity for agent execution flows, and optionally add the suggested prompt
note under the existing details summary to show an example phrasing for
reviewers.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit