Skip to content

Dynamic packets in Python#1953

Merged
ryanmelt merged 8 commits intomainfrom
dynamic_py
Mar 27, 2025
Merged

Dynamic packets in Python#1953
ryanmelt merged 8 commits intomainfrom
dynamic_py

Conversation

@jmthomas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@jmthomas jmthomas requested a review from ryanmelt March 17, 2025 21:49
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.86%. Comparing base (6c0b4a5) to head (6e0b1be).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1953      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.64%   76.86%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files         628      628              
  Lines       46552    46718     +166     
  Branches      755      755              
==========================================
+ Hits        35680    35911     +231     
+ Misses      10789    10724      -65     
  Partials       83       83              
Flag Coverage Δ
python 84.18% <ø> (+0.10%) ⬆️
ruby-api 48.41% <ø> (ø)
ruby-backend 82.88% <ø> (+0.34%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ryanmelt ryanmelt merged commit 36c686f into main Mar 27, 2025
29 of 30 checks passed
@ryanmelt ryanmelt deleted the dynamic_py branch March 27, 2025 15:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants