Skip to content

Conversation

@Archidoit
Copy link
Member

Proposed changes

Add the 'has label' relationship type in the values of the relationship type filter for knowledge widget :

image

Related issues

#13837

@Archidoit Archidoit self-assigned this Dec 31, 2025
@Archidoit Archidoit added the filigran team use to identify PR from the Filigran team label Dec 31, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 31, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 30.81%. Comparing base (c6105c3) to head (2902963).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ncti-front/src/utils/filters/useSearchEntities.tsx 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
...t/src/private/components/widgets/WidgetFilters.tsx 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #13859      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   30.85%   30.81%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files        2910     2911       +1     
  Lines      192289   192493     +204     
  Branches    39197    39283      +86     
==========================================
- Hits        59323    59313      -10     
- Misses     132966   133180     +214     
Flag Coverage Δ
opencti 30.81% <0.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
opencti-front 2.45% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
opencti-graphql 68.23% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

filigran team use to identify PR from the Filigran team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants