Add Java version check in server script and handle java9.option exclusions script changes

[Arunkumar-Kallyodan]

• I have considered the risk of behavior change or other zero migration impact (https://github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/wiki/Behavior-Changes).
• If this PR fixes an Issue, the description includes "Fixes #FILLMEIN" or "Resolves #FILLMEIN" (verify release bug label if applicable: https://github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/wiki/Open-Liberty-Conventions).
• If this PR resolves an external Known Issue (including APARS), the description includes "Fixes #FILLMEIN" or "Resolves #FILLMEIN".

Fixes ##32996

We include the --add-exports java.base/sun.security.action=ALL-UNNAMED JVM parameter in the java9.options file that is needed for the com.ibm.crypto.ibmkeycert.jar file.

Starting in Java 24, the sun.security.action.* classes were removed, so if the JVM parameter --add-exports java.base/sun.security.action=ALL-UNNAMED is passed in, the JVM gives an informational warning:

WARNING: package sun.security.action not in java.base

in the console.log file.

To fix this problem, the --add-exports java.base/sun.security.action=ALL-UNNAMED parameter should be excluded whenever running on Java 24+.

This update checks for the Java level in the release file (if it exists) in the JAVA_HOME directory. From this, if we are able to determine the Java level being used is Java 24+, then we exclude the JVM parameter --add-exports java.base/sun.security.action=ALL-UNNAMED. This update will also allow future JVM parameters from the java9.options file to be excluded if necessary.

This PR also grants explicit JNI permission when starting the JVM on z/OS when running on Java 24+. JNI is required on the z/OS platform and in Java 24+, explicit permission when starting the JVM is required to use JNI.

[Arunkumar-Kallyodan]

Created this new PR with verified commits

Hello @jhanders34 ,
I’ve cherry-picked the commits from @gjwatts #33028 and added the additional fix for the server-status issue during server startup, where the new Java option for native access wasn’t being set. Could you please review the PR?
@tspewak has already tested the changes on z/OS and confirmed they look good.

[Arunkumar-Kallyodan]

!build (view Open Liberty Personal Build - ❌ completed with errors/failures.)

Note: Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

[LibbyBot]

Code analysis and actions

DO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.

• 4 FAT files were changed, added, or removed.

• Check that the build did not break the affected FAT suite(s).

• 9 product code files were changed.

• Please describe in a separate comment how you tested your changes.

• 1 messages files were changed and need an L2 review.

• @OpenLiberty/message-reviewer Please review.

  • dev/com.ibm.ws.kernel.boot/resources/com/ibm/ws/kernel/boot/resources/LauncherMessages.nlsprops

• 1 NLS files were changed and need an ID review.

• @OpenLiberty/message-reviewer Please review.

  • dev/com.ibm.ws.kernel.boot/resources/com/ibm/ws/kernel/boot/resources/LauncherMessages.nlsprops