[FEAT] Redirect single search result to product page

[sreichel]

Description (*)

When product search has only one result, redirect to product page.

• new config options added (enabled by default)

Manual testing scenarios (*)

1. use sample data
2. search for "wonderland"
3. should redirect to a books product page

[fballiano]

this last version is a copy of MahoCommerce/maho#131 again without crediting the source

@colinmollenhour @kiatng @Hanmac

[sreichel]

I have waited for it ...

@fballiano do you think i am not able to put that into core myself? I took some year old extensions and added it ... w/o moving observer-stuff to core.

Did it came to your mind, to add that functionality at all? Nope. But it tooks you only a few hours to merge that - as every OM PR.

Instead of making noise again, better think about to contribute back in some way. Leave a thanks - a PR - , "i have some improvements". That would be nice.

(PS: i dont want to hear you cry when i port all of the no-prototype changes back - o/c /w leaving credits)

---

Fab, you cannot answer here (to my issues/PRs) anymore. I have finally blocked you - same you did to me long time ago. Please head up to discussions if there is something to tell.

[sreichel]

Fab,

• MahoCommerce/maho@d91a9a8
• MahoCommerce/maho@770d0ee
• MahoCommerce/maho@c402b97

You'd better made a suggestion before merge, but ....

[Hanmac]

Add @copyright Maho

[justinbeaty]

For the lazy, here's code from each PR:

Maho:

// Redirect to product if there's only one result
if (Mage::getStoreConfigFlag('catalog/search/redirect_to_product_if_one_result')) {
    $searchResultBlock = Mage::app()->getLayout()->getBlock('search_result_list');
    if ($searchResultBlock) {
        /** @var Mage_CatalogSearch_Model_Resource_Fulltext_Collection $productCollection */
        $productCollection = $searchResultBlock->getLoadedProductCollection();
        if ($productCollection && $productCollection->getSize() === 1) {
            $product = $productCollection->getFirstItem();
            $this->_redirectUrl($product->getProductUrl());
        }
    }
}

OM:

// Redirect to product if there's only one result
if ($helper->isRedirectSingleSearchResult()) {
    $searchResultBlock = $this->getLayout()->getBlock('search_result_list');
    if ($searchResultBlock) {
        /** @var Mage_CatalogSearch_Model_Resource_Fulltext_Collection $productCollection */
        $productCollection = $searchResultBlock->getLoadedProductCollection();
        if ($productCollection && $productCollection->getSize() === 1) {
            $product = $productCollection->getFirstItem();
            $this->_redirectUrl($product->getProductUrl());
        }
    }
}

[sreichel]

You took my code from this unreleased PR and opened MahoCommerce/maho#131 two days later. Only difference you added the observer code directly to the controller.

No link to this PR, but adding your copyright?

I'll rename the variables back later.

[Hanmac]

I tried to extract some timestamp data from the github commits to have that in perspective:

• The first OM Commit is from "2025-03-14T13:53:22.000Z" f7e70cc
• Maho commit is from "2025-03-16T10:37:57.000Z" MahoCommerce/maho@d65d8c7
• and the "Copied" OM commit is from "2025-03-16T17:29:50.000Z" d789e80

I would say yes, @fballiano used parts of the code to make his own PR (without linking the original PR, like they usally do)
But i would also say yes, that @sreichel copied the block of @fballiano

[justinbeaty]

I tried to extract some timestamp data from the github commits to have that in perspective [...]

Since I don't believe @fballiano can respond here, I will add a few more details:

The original Maho commit did indeed have the link to this PR as Fabrizio always does.

Then, Fabrizio and I discussed the introduction of the new observer interface and decided against it, so he rewrote the feature.

We already have (c) OpenMage in our headers, and Fabrizio ports the copyright update commits. So even if Maho copies code verbatim from OM, there is no license infringement. The reverse is not true because @sreichel is against including (c) Maho.

[Hanmac]

The original Maho commit did indeed have the link to this PR as Fabrizio always does.

but isn't this the wrong issue? commit links to #4668 to disable it, not to add the Result redirect?

[justinbeaty]

The original Maho commit did indeed have the link to this PR as Fabrizio always does.

but isn't this the wrong issue? commit links to #4668 to disable it, not to add the Result redirect?

You're right, I was mixed up because that was the commit that first introduced the observer->execute method.

However, my last point still stands, no?

[Hanmac]

However, my last point still stands, no?

In my opinion, it should be discussed how much own work justifies an extra @copyright

when i was comparing this f7e70cc with that MahoCommerce/maho@d65d8c7

the similarity was 79% (if changed the variable names, 83%)

But that's not something I want to decide.
There isn't much that can be different with that few lines of code

[sreichel]

the similarity was 79% (if changed the variable names, 83%)

@justinbeaty @empiricompany who copied who?

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
2 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[sreichel]

Add @copyright Maho

Nope. Not for renaming some vars and move code from A to B. In german we have something like "Wertschöpfungstiefe" ...

[empiricompany]

Add @copyright Maho
and reverting fab0bfe to better variable names

[colinmollenhour]

Holding due to concerns regarding the potential need to include Maho copyright notice/credit. This is not a decision or indication of opinion, just putting it on hold while it is discussed internally.