Skip to content

Enhance GovernorWithParams Testing: Edge Cases, Refactoring, and Documentation #5567

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

techvoyagerX
Copy link
Contributor

🧐 Motivation
The current tests for the GovernorWithParams extension cover nominal cases and primary signature-based voting scenarios. However, there is an opportunity to further improve the robustness and maintainability of these tests by:

  • Expanding edge case coverage (e.g., testing empty or malformed parameters and multiple sequential signature votes)
  • Refactoring duplicate signature verification logic into a shared helper function
  • Clarifying address comparisons for consistency (using .address or .target appropriately)
  • Enhancing inline documentation to better explain vote weight calculations and signature validations

📝 Details

  • Edge Case Testing:

    • Added tests to check for proper reversion when voting with empty parameters.
    • Included tests to verify that multiple sequential signature votes are handled correctly with nonce checks.
  • Refactoring:

    • Extracted a helper function (signVote) for signing votes, reducing duplicate code in both EOA and EIP-1271 signature tests.
  • Documentation & Consistency:

    • Updated inline comments to improve clarity on parameter manipulations and signature verification logic.
    • Standardized address comparisons in the deployment check section.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 10, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 37fa517

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant