Skip to content

Conversation

@sashaodessa
Copy link
Contributor

Fix incorrect variable names in the tryOperations function example in the utilities documentation.

The example was using x and y instead of the function parameters a and b, which would cause a compilation error.

@sashaodessa sashaodessa requested a review from a team as a code owner January 5, 2026 15:16
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jan 5, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 696273a

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@Amxx Amxx changed the base branch from master to typo-fixes January 5, 2026 15:17
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Walkthrough

The documentation file utilities.adoc was updated to correct the tryOperations function example. The function's arithmetic operations (tryAdd, trySub, tryMul, tryDiv) now reference the correct function parameters a and b instead of previously using undefined identifiers x and y.

Possibly related PRs

  • PR #6213: Modifies the same utilities.adoc Math example to replace incorrect x/y operands with the function parameters a and b in tryAdd/trySub/tryMul/tryDiv operations.

Suggested labels

typo

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: fixing variable names in a code example.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining the incorrect variable names and the compilation error they would cause.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a83d9aa and bac28ee.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/modules/ROOT/pages/utilities.adoc
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - solidity-contracts
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - solidity-contracts
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - solidity-contracts
  • GitHub Check: coverage
  • GitHub Check: tests-foundry
  • GitHub Check: halmos
  • GitHub Check: tests-upgradeable
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: slither
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/modules/ROOT/pages/utilities.adoc (1)

236-242: Example code is now correct.

The function body now properly references the parameters a and b instead of the previously undefined identifiers x and y. The code will compile correctly and serves as a valid example for users.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Amxx
Copy link
Collaborator

Amxx commented Jan 5, 2026

Already covered by #6209

@Amxx Amxx closed this Jan 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants