fix: correct NatSpec documentation errors

[Fallengirl]

1. Arrays.sol: upperBound comment said "strictly less than" but should be "less than or equal to" - the function returns array length when all elements are <= element, not just < element.
2. AccessManager.sol: comment referenced non-existent {executed} function, should be {execute}.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 0cbcf8c

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f764589f-d93e-4c65-9f27-580b6c6d8a90

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 45f032d and 0cbcf8c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• contracts/access/manager/AccessManager.sol
• contracts/utils/Arrays.sol

---

Walkthrough

This pull request updates NatSpec documentation comments in two contracts. In AccessManager.sol, the _isExecuting helper's documentation is corrected to reference "{execute}" instead of "{executed}". In Arrays.sol, the upperBound function's NatSpec is updated to clarify the termination condition as "less than or equal to element" instead of "strictly less than element". Both changes are documentation-only with no modifications to function implementations, logic, or behavior.

Suggested labels

typo

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and accurately summarizes the main change: correcting NatSpec documentation errors across two files.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is directly related to the changeset, providing specific details about which NatSpec comments were fixed and why.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

Tip

You can enable review details to help with troubleshooting, context usage and more.

Enable the reviews.review_details setting to include review details such as the model used, the time taken for each step and more in the review comments.