Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(api): clarify in docs that Well.has_tip checks only for unused tips #17455

Conversation

sanni-t
Copy link
Member

@sanni-t sanni-t commented Feb 6, 2025

Cherry-picked commit for 8.3.0 release branch

Original PR: #17412
Closes RQA-3790

Overview

Well.has_tip property has been checking for only clean/ unused tips since API v2.2 but the docstrings don't mention that. That has understandably caused some confusion in protocol behaviors. This PR helps mitigate that issue by clarifying the exact behavior of this property

Risk assessment

None.

…ips (#17412)

Closes RQA-3790

# Overview

`Well.has_tip` property has been checking for only clean/ unused tips since API
v2.2 but the docstrings don't mention that. That has understandably
caused some confusion in protocol behaviors. This PR helps mitigate that
issue by clarifying the exact behavior of this property

## Risk assessment

None.

---------

Co-authored-by: Max Marrone <[email protected]>
@sanni-t sanni-t requested a review from a team as a code owner February 6, 2025 20:32
@nusrat813 nusrat813 self-requested a review February 6, 2025 20:34
Copy link

@nusrat813 nusrat813 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sanni-t sanni-t merged commit 163a297 into chore_release-8.3.0 Feb 6, 2025
30 checks passed
@sanni-t sanni-t deleted the RQA-3790-on-8-3-0-specify_has_tip_checks_clean_tips_only branch February 6, 2025 21:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants