Skip to content

[pull] master from ethereum:master #388

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
pull merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2026
Merged

[pull] master from ethereum:master #388

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion EIPS/eip-8038.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Differently from other account read operations, `EXTCODESIZE` and `EXTCODECOPY`

### Interaction with [EIP-2926](./eip-2926.md)

[EIP-2926](./eip-2926.md) proposes to change how code is store in the state trie. One of the changes of this proposal is to include the code size as a new field in the account object (`codeSize`). With this change, the code size can be directly accessed with a single read to the database and thus `EXTCODESIZE` should maintain its previous cost formula, without including the additional `GAS_WARM_ACCESS`.
[EIP-2926](./eip-2926.md) proposes to change how code is stored in the state trie. One of the changes of this proposal is to include the code size as a new field in the account object (`codeSize`). With this change, the code size can be directly accessed with a single read to the database and thus `EXTCODESIZE` should maintain its previous cost formula, without including the additional `GAS_WARM_ACCESS`.

### Interaction with [EIP-7928](./eip-7928.md)

Expand Down
Loading