chore: Trace Azure DevOps workItems queries #11132
Conversation
| const {error: accessibleError, accessibleOrgs} = await this.getAccessibleOrgs(id) | ||
| if (!!accessibleError) return {error: accessibleError, projects: null} | ||
|
|
||
| await Promise.allSettled( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Apart from tracing, I only changed this to be parallel
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
packages/server/utils/AzureDevOpsServerManager.ts:527
- The variable 'allWorkItems' is declared but never populated. Consider pushing the retrieved work items (e.g., fullWorkItems) into 'allWorkItems' within the Promise.allSettled mapping to ensure the returned data is complete.
accessibleOrgs.map(async (resource) => {
|
@coderabbitai review |
WalkthroughThis change enhances the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client as Client
participant Manager as AzureDevOpsServerManager
participant Tracer as dd-trace
Client->>Manager: Call method (e.g., getWorkItemData)
Manager->>Tracer: tracer.trace("getWorkItemData", () => { ... })
Tracer-->>Manager: Execute wrapped logic with tracing
Manager->>Client: Return traced result
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/server/utils/AzureDevOpsServerManager.ts (1)
433-433: Consider simplifying double-negation patterns.While functionally correct, using double-negation (
!!) is flagged by static analysis. Consider using more explicit type checking or Boolean conversion.- if (!!fields ? {ids, fields: fields} : {ids, $expand: 'Links'}) + if (fields ? {ids, fields: fields} : {ids, $expand: 'Links'}) - if (!!meError || !azureDevOpsUser) return {error: meError, projects: null} + if (meError || !azureDevOpsUser) return {error: meError, projects: null} - if (!!workItemsError) { + if (workItemsError) { - if (!!workItems) { + if (workItems) { - if (!!fullWorkItemsError) { + if (fullWorkItemsError) { - if (!!accessibleError) return {error: accessibleError, projects: null} + if (accessibleError) return {error: accessibleError, projects: null}Also applies to: 524-524, 536-536, 541-541, 546-546, 588-588
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 433-433: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/server/utils/AzureDevOpsServerManager.ts(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/server/utils/AzureDevOpsServerManager.ts
[error] 433-433: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation
(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 524-524: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation
(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 536-536: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation
(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 541-541: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation
(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 546-546: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation
(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 588-588: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation
(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/server/utils/AzureDevOpsServerManager.ts (8)
2-2: Nice addition of tracing capabilities.Adding the
dd-tracelibrary is a good move for improving observability and performance monitoring of the Azure DevOps operations.
426-450: Good implementation of tracing for getWorkItemData.The method has been properly wrapped with the tracer while maintaining the existing business logic. This will provide valuable performance insights without affecting functionality.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 433-433: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
452-479: Clean implementation of tracing for executeWiqlQuery.The method has been effectively wrapped with the tracer. The refactored work item mapping (lines 468-470) is more concise and directly extracts only the needed properties (id and url).
487-507: Well-structured tracing implementation for getWorkItems.The method maintains all its original query construction logic while adding tracing capabilities. The code remains clear and readable.
514-559: Good use of Promise.allSettled for parallel processing.Apart from adding tracing, this method has been improved by using Promise.allSettled to handle multiple asynchronous calls concurrently, which can improve performance while still properly handling errors.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 524-524: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 536-536: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 541-541: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
[error] 546-546: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
579-603: Well-structured tracing for getAllUserProjects.The method has been properly wrapped with the tracer while maintaining the existing error handling and business logic.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 588-588: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
617-638: Good implementation of tracing for getProjectProcessTemplate.The method has been properly wrapped with the tracer while maintaining the existing chain of API calls and error handling.
641-654: Clean tracing implementation for getProcessTemplate.The method has been well-wrapped with the tracer while preserving the original special case handling for unknown process error codes.
Description
Relates to #10906
[Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue]
Demo
[If possible, please include a screenshot or gif/video, it'll make it easier for reviewers to understand the scope of the changes and how the change is supposed to work. If you're introducing something new or changing the existing patterns, please share a Loom and explain what decisions you've made and under what circumstances]
Testing scenarios
[Please list all the testing scenarios a reviewer has to check before approving the PR]
Scenario A
Scenario B
Final checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor