001 ruff formatting #209
Open
001 ruff formatting #209
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
grische
reviewed
Dec 1, 2025
| @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ | |||
| <!-- | |||
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
do we need those .specify files for ruff formatting?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Switched from black/isort/flake8 to ruff.
This was implemented with spec kit to test its capabilities and thus also contains the spec kit files. To be determined if this is a good idea or not and what the policy regarding its use is going forward.