-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
bugfix to ensure resync cannot fail due to table size too large #4196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was researching on this option and found that overriding
max_table_size_to_dropsetting at query time is available only after ClickHousev23.12--> https://clickhouse.com/docs/whats-new/changelog/2023#2312I understand that someone using such an ancient version is a low-probability corner case. Anyway, even if that happens, the setting will be just ignored and they would not get any worse than the current situation, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I was wrong in my assumption, I did run a little experiment:
So I think this would indeed fail on older versions. Maybe we can add a version check to the condition?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have a whole framework for version-aware CH settings under https://github.com/PeerDB-io/peerdb/blob/main/flow/internal/clickhouse/settings.go. I think this logic should move to generateCreateTableSQLForNormalizedTable and be appended to SQL like the other cases we use settings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pfcoperez good call on checking ch version before adding it to the context.
@ilidemi i was worried that
SETTINGS max_table_size_to_drop = 0get applied to the CREATE TABLE as a table-level storage setting, but looks like clickhouse handles this automagically here