fix: add labs to documentation testing workflow#9560
Open
andrijapau wants to merge 27 commits into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
I feel bad @dwierichs , you write these nice docstrings (#9539) and they aren't even being tested. 😢 I've opened this as a WIP pr to chip away at whenever I have some spare time. Feel free to help out! |
andrijapau
commented
Jun 2, 2026
andrijapau
commented
Jun 2, 2026
| >>> op = batched_pauli_decompose(mat) | ||
| >>> op | ||
| 0.25 * X(1) + 0.4 * Z(1) | ||
| 0.25 * X(0) + 0.4 * (X(1) @ Z(0)) |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
previous was wrong (look at hamiltonian)
andrijapau
commented
Jun 2, 2026
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Without this, there were import errors
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9560 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.45% 99.45%
=======================================
Files 614 614
Lines 67863 67865 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 67490 67492 +2
Misses 373 373 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
…pected output for that
…nto fix/labs-doctest
…e in variational_kak
andrijapau
commented
Jun 3, 2026
| >>> print(qre.estimate(sos_state)) | ||
| --- Resources: --- | ||
| Total wires: 32 | ||
| Total wires: 51 |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Jaybsoni , flagging this in case it's unexpected
andrijapau
commented
Jun 3, 2026
| 3: ─────────────╰⊕─╰X─┤ State | ||
| 2: ──X─╭●──X──────────┤ ╭State | ||
| 4: ────╰X─╭●─╭●───────┤ ├State | ||
| 1: ──X────├●─│────────┤ ├State |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this additional X expected? 😓
andrijapau
commented
Jun 3, 2026
andrijapau
added
review-ready 👌
dwierichs
requested changes
Jun 3, 2026
Contributor
dwierichs
left a comment
dwierichs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All looks good/easy to conclude to me :) Will approve after last things are resolved 👍
| 3: ─────────────╰⊕─╰X─┤ State | ||
| 2: ──X─╭●──X──────────┤ ╭State | ||
| 4: ────╰X─╭●─╭●───────┤ ├State | ||
| 1: ──X────├●─│────────┤ ├State |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context:
Just because docstrings are in
labsdoesn't mean they shouldn't be CI / CD tested.[sc-121352]